Low-frequency relationship between money growth and inflation in Turkey

IF 3.2 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Huseyin Tastan, Department of Economics, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey, Sercin Sahin
{"title":"Low-frequency relationship between money growth and inflation in Turkey","authors":"Huseyin Tastan, Department of Economics, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey, Sercin Sahin","doi":"10.3934/qfe.2020005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the long-run and medium-run predictive relationship between money growth and inflation in Turkey for the period 1986m1–2018m12, using frequency-domain methods. For the full sample, the measures of spectral coherence and gain spectrum suggest a one-to-one relationship, and the frequency domain decomposition of the Granger causality test indicates a bidirectional predictive relationship between the two variables at zero frequency. As suggested by the wavelet coherence, we also analyzed the two subperiods before and after 2006 separately. Our results suggest that while both variables have predictive power for each other in the second subperiod, only money growth helps predict inflation in the first one. In order to prevent spurious results, the analysis is rerun in a multivariate Vector Autoregression (VAR) system, where output growth, interest rate, exchange rate growth, and domestic debt growth are included as additional variables. We observe that while money growth has predictive power for inflation in the first subperiod, this relationship disappears in the second one. We argue that the change in the relationship between the two variables at low frequencies after 2006 is primarily a result of the decrease in fiscal dominance of the government, the CBRT’s switch to the inflation targeting regime, and the CBRT’s “unconventional monetary policy framework”.","PeriodicalId":45226,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Finance and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Finance and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/qfe.2020005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This paper examines the long-run and medium-run predictive relationship between money growth and inflation in Turkey for the period 1986m1–2018m12, using frequency-domain methods. For the full sample, the measures of spectral coherence and gain spectrum suggest a one-to-one relationship, and the frequency domain decomposition of the Granger causality test indicates a bidirectional predictive relationship between the two variables at zero frequency. As suggested by the wavelet coherence, we also analyzed the two subperiods before and after 2006 separately. Our results suggest that while both variables have predictive power for each other in the second subperiod, only money growth helps predict inflation in the first one. In order to prevent spurious results, the analysis is rerun in a multivariate Vector Autoregression (VAR) system, where output growth, interest rate, exchange rate growth, and domestic debt growth are included as additional variables. We observe that while money growth has predictive power for inflation in the first subperiod, this relationship disappears in the second one. We argue that the change in the relationship between the two variables at low frequencies after 2006 is primarily a result of the decrease in fiscal dominance of the government, the CBRT’s switch to the inflation targeting regime, and the CBRT’s “unconventional monetary policy framework”.
土耳其货币增长与通货膨胀的低频关系
本文使用频域方法研究了土耳其1986m1 - 2018m1期间货币增长与通货膨胀之间的长期和中期预测关系。对于整个样本,频谱相干性和增益谱的测量结果显示出一对一的关系,格兰杰因果检验的频域分解表明两个变量在零频率下存在双向预测关系。根据小波相干性,我们还分别分析了2006年前后的两个子周期。我们的结果表明,虽然两个变量在第二个子周期中相互具有预测能力,但只有货币增长有助于预测第一个子周期中的通货膨胀。为了防止虚假的结果,在多元向量自回归(VAR)系统中重新进行分析,其中包括产出增长,利率,汇率增长和国内债务增长作为附加变量。我们观察到,虽然货币增长在第一个子周期对通货膨胀具有预测能力,但这种关系在第二个子周期中消失。本文认为,2006年以后两个变量之间低频关系的变化主要是政府财政主导地位下降、央行转向通胀目标制以及央行“非常规货币政策框架”的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
1.90%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信