“Regular” CS × Inclusive Design = Smarter Students and Greater Diversity

IF 3.2 3区 工程技术 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Rosalinda Garcia, Patricia Morreale, Lara Letaw, Amreeta Chatterjee, Pankati Patel, Sarah Yang, Isaac Tijerina Escobar, Geraldine Jimena Noa, Margaret Burnett
{"title":"“Regular” CS × Inclusive Design = Smarter Students and Greater Diversity","authors":"Rosalinda Garcia, Patricia Morreale, Lara Letaw, Amreeta Chatterjee, Pankati Patel, Sarah Yang, Isaac Tijerina Escobar, Geraldine Jimena Noa, Margaret Burnett","doi":"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3603535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>What if “regular” Computer Science (CS) faculty each taught elements of inclusive design in “regular” CS courses across an undergraduate curriculum? Would it affect the CS program's climate and inclusiveness to diverse students? Would it improve retention? Would students learn less CS? Would they actually learn any inclusive design? To answer these questions, we conducted a year-long Action Research investigation, in which 13 CS faculty integrated elements of inclusive design into 44 CS/IT offerings across a 4-year curriculum. The 613 affected students’ educational work products, grades, and/or climate questionnaire responses revealed significant improvements in students’ course outcomes (higher course grades and fewer course fails/incompletes/withdrawals), especially for marginalized groups; revealed that most students did learn and apply inclusive design concepts to their CS activities; and revealed that inclusion and teamwork in the courses significantly improved. These results suggest a new pathway for significantly improving students’ retention, their knowledge and usage of inclusive design, and their experiences across CS education—for marginalized groups and for all students.</p>","PeriodicalId":48764,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computing Education","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computing Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3603535","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What if “regular” Computer Science (CS) faculty each taught elements of inclusive design in “regular” CS courses across an undergraduate curriculum? Would it affect the CS program's climate and inclusiveness to diverse students? Would it improve retention? Would students learn less CS? Would they actually learn any inclusive design? To answer these questions, we conducted a year-long Action Research investigation, in which 13 CS faculty integrated elements of inclusive design into 44 CS/IT offerings across a 4-year curriculum. The 613 affected students’ educational work products, grades, and/or climate questionnaire responses revealed significant improvements in students’ course outcomes (higher course grades and fewer course fails/incompletes/withdrawals), especially for marginalized groups; revealed that most students did learn and apply inclusive design concepts to their CS activities; and revealed that inclusion and teamwork in the courses significantly improved. These results suggest a new pathway for significantly improving students’ retention, their knowledge and usage of inclusive design, and their experiences across CS education—for marginalized groups and for all students.

“常规”CS ×包容性设计=更聪明的学生和更大的多样性
如果“常规”计算机科学(CS)教师在本科课程的“常规”计算机科学课程中教授包容性设计的元素会怎么样?它会影响CS项目的氛围和对不同学生的包容性吗?它会提高留存率吗?学生们会少学计算机科学吗?他们真的会学习包容性设计吗?为了回答这些问题,我们进行了为期一年的行动研究调查,其中13名CS教师将包容性设计的元素整合到4年制课程中的44个CS/IT课程中。613名受影响学生的教育工作成果、成绩和/或气候问卷调查结果显示,学生的课程成绩显著改善(课程成绩提高,课程不及格/不完成/退学减少),尤其是对边缘群体;结果显示,大部分学生确实在计算机科学活动中学习并应用了包容性设计理念;并发现课程的包容性和团队合作显著提高。这些结果为显著提高学生的保留率、包容性设计的知识和使用,以及他们在CS教育中的体验提供了一条新途径——针对边缘群体和所有学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Computing Education
ACM Transactions on Computing Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) (formerly named JERIC, Journal on Educational Resources in Computing) covers diverse aspects of computing education: traditional computer science, computer engineering, information technology, and informatics; emerging aspects of computing; and applications of computing to other disciplines. The common characteristics shared by these papers are a scholarly approach to teaching and learning, a broad appeal to educational practitioners, and a clear connection to student learning.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信