Do Not Harm in Private Chat Apps: Ethical Issues for Research on and with WhatsApp

Sérgio Barbosa, Stefania Milan
{"title":"Do Not Harm in Private Chat Apps: Ethical Issues for Research on and with WhatsApp","authors":"Sérgio Barbosa, Stefania Milan","doi":"10.16997/wpcc.313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"WhatsApp has remained under the radar for it is scarcely accessible to overt scholarly scrutiny. Encrypted chat apps allow for a certain degree of perceived secrecy. Yet the high frequency of civic engagement makes ethnographic research a time-consuming exercise. This article investigates how digital ethnography inside WhatsApp groups requires up-to-date, innovative ethical guidelines. We suggest a two-pronged approach. On the one hand, we should rethink and update ‘known’ ways of doing ethics, undertaking at least three conceptual operations: going back to the basics, positing as central the notion of ‘do not harm’, which allows to re-centre the user within the research process; avoid reducing research ethics to a one-stop checklist, to privilege instead a recursive, iterative and dialogic process able to engage research subjects; moving past the consent form as the sole and merely regulatory moment of the researcher-research subject relationship. On the other hand, while thinking through innovative ways of considering ethics in chat app research, we ought to take infrastructure seriously, both the site of research and the research ecosystem; embrace transparency and avoid by all means covert bypasses; and guarantee full anonymisation to our research subjects.","PeriodicalId":501106,"journal":{"name":"Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16997/wpcc.313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

WhatsApp has remained under the radar for it is scarcely accessible to overt scholarly scrutiny. Encrypted chat apps allow for a certain degree of perceived secrecy. Yet the high frequency of civic engagement makes ethnographic research a time-consuming exercise. This article investigates how digital ethnography inside WhatsApp groups requires up-to-date, innovative ethical guidelines. We suggest a two-pronged approach. On the one hand, we should rethink and update ‘known’ ways of doing ethics, undertaking at least three conceptual operations: going back to the basics, positing as central the notion of ‘do not harm’, which allows to re-centre the user within the research process; avoid reducing research ethics to a one-stop checklist, to privilege instead a recursive, iterative and dialogic process able to engage research subjects; moving past the consent form as the sole and merely regulatory moment of the researcher-research subject relationship. On the other hand, while thinking through innovative ways of considering ethics in chat app research, we ought to take infrastructure seriously, both the site of research and the research ecosystem; embrace transparency and avoid by all means covert bypasses; and guarantee full anonymisation to our research subjects.
不伤害私人聊天应用:WhatsApp研究的伦理问题
WhatsApp一直不为人所知,因为它几乎无法接受公开的学术审查。加密的聊天应用程序允许一定程度的感知保密。然而,公民参与的高频率使得民族志研究成为一项耗时的工作。本文调查了WhatsApp群组内的数字人种学如何需要最新的创新道德准则。我们建议采取双管齐下的办法。一方面,我们应该重新思考和更新“已知的”伦理行为方式,至少进行三种概念性操作:回归基础,将“不伤害”的概念定位为中心,这允许在研究过程中重新以用户为中心;避免将研究伦理简化为一站式检查清单,而是赋予能够参与研究对象的递归、迭代和对话过程特权;不再将同意书作为研究者与研究对象关系的唯一和唯一的调节时刻。另一方面,在通过创新的方式思考聊天应用研究中的伦理问题时,我们应该重视基础设施,无论是研究场所还是研究生态系统;拥抱透明度,避免一切隐蔽的绕过;并保证我们的研究对象完全匿名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信