The prophylactic omentectomy procedure in reducing the complication rate of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in pediatric: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Gede Wirya Kusuma Duarsa, Ronald Sugianto, Pande Made Wisnu Tirtayasa, Ni Made Apriliani Saniti, Komang Harsa Abhinaya Duarsa
{"title":"The prophylactic omentectomy procedure in reducing the complication rate of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in pediatric: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Gede Wirya Kusuma Duarsa, Ronald Sugianto, Pande Made Wisnu Tirtayasa, Ni Made Apriliani Saniti, Komang Harsa Abhinaya Duarsa","doi":"10.4081/aiua.2023.12049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The role of the omentectomy procedure on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) catheter placement in pediatric patients has been differently evaluated in the literature, with some studies showing improvement while others showing no difference. Our study aims to define the advantages of omentectomy compared to a procedure without omentectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature searching in online databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus, and ClinicalTrial.gov) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023412846). The protocol was performed through April 2023 and focused on pediatric patients treated with an omentectomy procedure and related complications. The risk of bias in each study was assessed using the risk of bias for the non-randomized control trials (ROBINS-I). The effect estimates were extracted as risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The heterogeneity of the studies was considered as high heterogeneity if I2 values above 50% or p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the total of 676 articles identified in the database searching for screening, nine studies with 775 patients met the criteria for inclusion. The omentectomy procedure significantly showed a lower incidence of catheter obstruction compared to the control group, (OR 0.24 [95% CI, 0.12-0.49], p < 0.0001, I2 = 0%). Moreover, omentectomy demonstrated a similar trend in the rate of removal or reinsertion of the catheter with high heterogeneity, OR 0.25 [95% CI, 0.12-0.51), p = 0.0002, I2 = 70%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The omentectomy procedure showed a lower incidence of catheter obstruction and complications leading to removal or reinsertion of the catheter.</p>","PeriodicalId":46900,"journal":{"name":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2023.12049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The role of the omentectomy procedure on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) catheter placement in pediatric patients has been differently evaluated in the literature, with some studies showing improvement while others showing no difference. Our study aims to define the advantages of omentectomy compared to a procedure without omentectomy.

Methods: The literature searching in online databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus, and ClinicalTrial.gov) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023412846). The protocol was performed through April 2023 and focused on pediatric patients treated with an omentectomy procedure and related complications. The risk of bias in each study was assessed using the risk of bias for the non-randomized control trials (ROBINS-I). The effect estimates were extracted as risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The heterogeneity of the studies was considered as high heterogeneity if I2 values above 50% or p < 0.05.

Results: In the total of 676 articles identified in the database searching for screening, nine studies with 775 patients met the criteria for inclusion. The omentectomy procedure significantly showed a lower incidence of catheter obstruction compared to the control group, (OR 0.24 [95% CI, 0.12-0.49], p < 0.0001, I2 = 0%). Moreover, omentectomy demonstrated a similar trend in the rate of removal or reinsertion of the catheter with high heterogeneity, OR 0.25 [95% CI, 0.12-0.51), p = 0.0002, I2 = 70%).

Conclusions: The omentectomy procedure showed a lower incidence of catheter obstruction and complications leading to removal or reinsertion of the catheter.

预防性网膜切除术在降低儿科连续门诊腹膜透析并发症发生率中的作用:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
文献对网膜切除术对儿科患者持续动态腹膜透析(CAPD)导管放置的作用有不同的评价,一些研究显示改善,而另一些研究显示没有差异。我们的研究旨在确定网膜切除术与不切除网膜的手术相比的优势。方法:按照PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis)指南,在在线数据库(PubMed/MEDLINE、Cochrane Library、EMBASE、Scopus和ClinicalTrial.gov)中检索文献,并在PROSPERO (CRD42023412846)上注册。该方案一直持续到2023年4月,重点是接受网膜切除术及相关并发症治疗的儿科患者。使用非随机对照试验(ROBINS-I)的偏倚风险评估每项研究的偏倚风险。效果估计提取为95%置信区间(CI)的风险比。如果I2值大于50%或p < 0.05,则认为研究具有高异质性。结果:在数据库中检索筛选的676篇文章中,有9项研究775例患者符合纳入标准。与对照组相比,网膜切除术明显降低了导管阻塞的发生率(OR 0.24 [95% CI, 0.12-0.49], p < 0.0001, I2 = 0%)。此外,网膜切除术在导管拔出或重新插入率方面也表现出类似的趋势,但异质性很高,or为0.25 (95% CI, 0.12-0.51), p = 0.0002, I2 = 70%)。结论:大网膜切除术显示了较低的导管阻塞发生率和导致导管拔出或重新插入的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
35.70%
发文量
72
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信