The use of electronic health record embedded MRC-ICU as a metric for critical care pharmacist workload.

IF 2.5 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JAMIA Open Pub Date : 2023-12-05 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad101
Andrew J Webb, Bayleigh Carver, Sandra Rowe, Andrea Sikora
{"title":"The use of electronic health record embedded MRC-ICU as a metric for critical care pharmacist workload.","authors":"Andrew J Webb, Bayleigh Carver, Sandra Rowe, Andrea Sikora","doi":"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A lack of pharmacist-specific risk-stratification scores in the electronic health record (EHR) may limit resource optimization. The medication regimen complexity-intensive care unit (MRC-ICU) score was implemented into our center's EHR for use by clinical pharmacists. The purpose of this evaluation was to evaluate MRC-ICU as a predictor of pharmacist workload and to assess its potential as an additional dimension to traditional workload measures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data were abstracted from the EHR on adult ICU patients, including MRC-ICU scores and 2 traditional measures of pharmacist workload: numbers of medication orders verified and interventions logged. This was a single-center study of an EHR-integrated MRC-ICU tool. The primary outcome was the association of MRC-ICU with institutional metrics of pharmacist workload. Associations were assessed using the initial 24-h maximum MRC-ICU score's Pearson's correlation with overall admission workload and the day-to-day association using generalized linear mixed-effects modeling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1205 patients over 5083 patient-days were evaluated. Baseline MRC-ICU was correlated with both cumulative order volume (Spearman's rho 0.41, <i>P</i> < .001) and cumulative interventions placed (Spearman's rho 0.27, <i>P</i> < .001). A 1-point increase in maximum daily MRC-ICU was associated with a 31% increase in order volume (95% CI, 24%-38%) and 4% increase in interventions (95% CI, 2%-5%).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>The MRC-ICU is a validated score that has been previously correlated with important patient-centered outcomes. Here, MRC-ICU was modestly associated with 2 traditional objective measures of pharmacist workload, including orders verified and interventions placed, which is an important step for its use as a tool for resource utilization needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":36278,"journal":{"name":"JAMIA Open","volume":"6 4","pages":"ooad101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10697785/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMIA Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooad101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: A lack of pharmacist-specific risk-stratification scores in the electronic health record (EHR) may limit resource optimization. The medication regimen complexity-intensive care unit (MRC-ICU) score was implemented into our center's EHR for use by clinical pharmacists. The purpose of this evaluation was to evaluate MRC-ICU as a predictor of pharmacist workload and to assess its potential as an additional dimension to traditional workload measures.

Materials and methods: Data were abstracted from the EHR on adult ICU patients, including MRC-ICU scores and 2 traditional measures of pharmacist workload: numbers of medication orders verified and interventions logged. This was a single-center study of an EHR-integrated MRC-ICU tool. The primary outcome was the association of MRC-ICU with institutional metrics of pharmacist workload. Associations were assessed using the initial 24-h maximum MRC-ICU score's Pearson's correlation with overall admission workload and the day-to-day association using generalized linear mixed-effects modeling.

Results: A total of 1205 patients over 5083 patient-days were evaluated. Baseline MRC-ICU was correlated with both cumulative order volume (Spearman's rho 0.41, P < .001) and cumulative interventions placed (Spearman's rho 0.27, P < .001). A 1-point increase in maximum daily MRC-ICU was associated with a 31% increase in order volume (95% CI, 24%-38%) and 4% increase in interventions (95% CI, 2%-5%).

Discussion and conclusion: The MRC-ICU is a validated score that has been previously correlated with important patient-centered outcomes. Here, MRC-ICU was modestly associated with 2 traditional objective measures of pharmacist workload, including orders verified and interventions placed, which is an important step for its use as a tool for resource utilization needs.

使用嵌入MRC-ICU的电子健康记录作为重症监护药剂师工作量的度量。
目的:在电子健康记录(EHR)中缺乏药剂师特定的风险分层评分可能会限制资源优化。将药物治疗方案复杂性-重症监护病房(MRC-ICU)评分纳入我中心的电子病历,供临床药师使用。本评估的目的是评估MRC-ICU作为药剂师工作量的预测因子,并评估其作为传统工作量测量的额外维度的潜力。材料和方法:从成人ICU患者的电子病历中提取数据,包括MRC-ICU评分和药剂师工作量的2个传统指标:验证的药物订单数量和记录的干预措施。这是一项ehr整合MRC-ICU工具的单中心研究。主要结局是MRC-ICU与药剂师工作量的机构指标的关联。使用最初24小时最大MRC-ICU评分与总体入院工作量的Pearson相关性和使用广义线性混合效应模型的日常关联来评估相关性。结果:共评估1205例患者,超过5083患者日。基线MRC-ICU与累积订单量相关(Spearman的rho为0.41,P)讨论和结论:MRC-ICU是一个经过验证的评分,以前与重要的以患者为中心的结果相关。在这里,MRC-ICU与药剂师工作量的两项传统客观指标适度相关,包括验证的订单和采取的干预措施,这是将其用作资源利用需求工具的重要一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMIA Open
JAMIA Open Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
102
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信