A qualitative exploration of behaviour change and maintenance experience in people with overweight or obesity in a dietary intervention.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Nutrition & Dietetics Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-06 DOI:10.1111/1747-0080.12855
Kai Liu, Tammie S T Choi, Lijun Zhao, Xiao Tong Teong, Amy T Hutchison, Leonie K Heilbronn
{"title":"A qualitative exploration of behaviour change and maintenance experience in people with overweight or obesity in a dietary intervention.","authors":"Kai Liu, Tammie S T Choi, Lijun Zhao, Xiao Tong Teong, Amy T Hutchison, Leonie K Heilbronn","doi":"10.1111/1747-0080.12855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This qualitative study aimed to explore the experiences of participants who were enrolled in 6-month controlled weight loss interventions with 2-month follow-up to better understand the process of behaviour change and maintenance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifteen participants who completed or dropped out from either a daily energy restriction or intermittent fasting group were recruited using maximum variation purposive sampling. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted at the 2-month follow-up phase. All interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis, guided by behaviour change models including transtheoretical model, social cognitive theory and integrated model of change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants following both diets showed similar behaviour change patterns. Their first motivations were mostly external and relied on 'accountability' to adhere to the diet when initiating the dietary changes. Participants highlighted the importance of frequent reviews and monitoring in assisting their adherence. This feedback system promoted the development of self-efficacy and internalised motivation to encourage an 'ownership'. Participants who transitioned successfully from relying on accountability to take 'ownership' of the intervention were more capable of tackling challenges and tailoring their diet to form a new routine for long-term maintenance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>External motivations were key to initiate while internalised motivations were more important to sustain the behaviour change. Health professionals can assist this process through routine monitoring and feedback processes in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":19368,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Dietetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12855","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This qualitative study aimed to explore the experiences of participants who were enrolled in 6-month controlled weight loss interventions with 2-month follow-up to better understand the process of behaviour change and maintenance.

Methods: Fifteen participants who completed or dropped out from either a daily energy restriction or intermittent fasting group were recruited using maximum variation purposive sampling. In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted at the 2-month follow-up phase. All interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis, guided by behaviour change models including transtheoretical model, social cognitive theory and integrated model of change.

Results: Participants following both diets showed similar behaviour change patterns. Their first motivations were mostly external and relied on 'accountability' to adhere to the diet when initiating the dietary changes. Participants highlighted the importance of frequent reviews and monitoring in assisting their adherence. This feedback system promoted the development of self-efficacy and internalised motivation to encourage an 'ownership'. Participants who transitioned successfully from relying on accountability to take 'ownership' of the intervention were more capable of tackling challenges and tailoring their diet to form a new routine for long-term maintenance.

Conclusion: External motivations were key to initiate while internalised motivations were more important to sustain the behaviour change. Health professionals can assist this process through routine monitoring and feedback processes in clinical practice.

饮食干预中超重或肥胖人群行为改变和维持经验的定性探索。
目的:本定性研究旨在探讨参与6个月控制减肥干预的参与者的经历,并进行2个月的随访,以更好地了解行为改变和维持的过程。方法:15名完成或退出每日能量限制组或间歇性禁食组的参与者采用最大变异目的抽样。在2个月的随访阶段进行了深入的半结构化访谈。在行为改变模型的指导下,包括跨理论模型、社会认知理论和综合变化模型,所有访谈都采用主题分析进行转录和分析。结果:遵循两种饮食的参与者表现出相似的行为改变模式。他们最初的动机大多是外在的,在开始改变饮食习惯时,他们依赖于“问责制”来坚持饮食。与会者强调了经常审查和监测的重要性,以帮助他们遵守。这种反馈系统促进了自我效能感的发展和鼓励“所有权”的内化动机。成功地从依赖问责制过渡到“拥有”干预的参与者更有能力应对挑战,调整饮食,形成长期维持的新常规。结论:外在动机是引发行为改变的关键,而内在动机对维持行为改变更为重要。卫生专业人员可以通过临床实践中的常规监测和反馈过程来协助这一过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition & Dietetics
Nutrition & Dietetics 医学-营养学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.10%
发文量
69
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition & Dietetics is the official journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia. Covering all aspects of food, nutrition and dietetics, the Journal provides a forum for the reporting, discussion and development of scientifically credible knowledge related to human nutrition and dietetics. Widely respected in Australia and around the world, Nutrition & Dietetics publishes original research, methodology analyses, research reviews and much more. The Journal aims to keep health professionals abreast of current knowledge on human nutrition and diet, and accepts contributions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信