An Adverse Social Welfare Effect of Quadruply Gainful Trade

IF 1 Q3 ECONOMICS
Oded Stark, Grzegorz Kosiorowski
{"title":"An Adverse Social Welfare Effect of Quadruply Gainful Trade","authors":"Oded Stark, Grzegorz Kosiorowski","doi":"10.11644/kiep.eaer.2020.24.3.377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Acknowledging that individuals dislike having low relative income renders trade less attractive when seen as a technology that integrates two economies by merging separate social spheres into one. We define a “trembling trade” as a situation in which gains from trade are less than losses in relative income, with the result that global social welfare is reduced. We show that a “trembling trade” can arise even when trade is more gainful in four ways: through trade the absolute income of everyone increases, the income gap in both economies is reduced, as is the income gap between the trading economies. However, trade brings populations, economies, or markets that were not previously connected closer together in social space. As a consequence, separate social spheres merge, and people’s social space and their comparators are altered. Assuming that people like high (absolute) income and dislike low relative income, the aggregate increase in unhappiness caused by the trade-induced escalation in relative deprivation can result in a negative overall impact of trade on (utilitarian-measured) social welfare, if the absolute income gains are not large enough to mitigate the relative income losses.","PeriodicalId":41122,"journal":{"name":"East Asian Economic Review","volume":"5 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Asian Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11644/kiep.eaer.2020.24.3.377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acknowledging that individuals dislike having low relative income renders trade less attractive when seen as a technology that integrates two economies by merging separate social spheres into one. We define a “trembling trade” as a situation in which gains from trade are less than losses in relative income, with the result that global social welfare is reduced. We show that a “trembling trade” can arise even when trade is more gainful in four ways: through trade the absolute income of everyone increases, the income gap in both economies is reduced, as is the income gap between the trading economies. However, trade brings populations, economies, or markets that were not previously connected closer together in social space. As a consequence, separate social spheres merge, and people’s social space and their comparators are altered. Assuming that people like high (absolute) income and dislike low relative income, the aggregate increase in unhappiness caused by the trade-induced escalation in relative deprivation can result in a negative overall impact of trade on (utilitarian-measured) social welfare, if the absolute income gains are not large enough to mitigate the relative income losses.
四倍收益贸易的不利社会福利效应
承认个人不喜欢相对收入低,当贸易被视为一种通过将不同的社会领域合并为一体来整合两个经济体的技术时,它就不那么有吸引力了。我们将“颤抖的贸易”定义为一种情况,即贸易的收益小于相对收入的损失,其结果是全球社会福利减少。我们的研究表明,即使在贸易收益增加的情况下,“颤抖的贸易”也会在以下四个方面出现:通过贸易,每个人的绝对收入都会增加,两个经济体的收入差距都会缩小,贸易经济体之间的收入差距也会缩小。然而,贸易使以前在社会空间中没有联系的人口、经济或市场更加紧密地联系在一起。因此,不同的社会领域合并,人们的社会空间和比较对象被改变。假设人们喜欢高(绝对)收入,不喜欢低(相对)收入,那么,如果绝对收入收益不足以抵消相对收入损失,贸易导致的相对剥夺升级所导致的不快乐的总体增加,可能会导致贸易对(以功利主义衡量的)社会福利产生负面的总体影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
12.50%
发文量
10
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信