Varun Kanade, Frederik Mallmann-Trenn, Thomas Sauerwald
{"title":"On coalescence time in graphs–When is coalescing as fast as meeting?","authors":"Varun Kanade, Frederik Mallmann-Trenn, Thomas Sauerwald","doi":"https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3576900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Coalescing random walks is a fundamental distributed process, where a set of particles perform independent discrete-time random walks on an undirected graph. Whenever two or more particles meet at a given node, they merge and continue as a single random walk. The <i>coalescence time</i> is defined as the expected time until only one particle remains, starting from one particle at every node. Despite recent progress such as by Cooper et al. [14] and Cooper et al. [19], the coalescence time for graphs such as binary trees, <i>d</i>-dimensional tori, hypercubes and more generally, vertex-transitive graphs, remains unresolved. </p><p>We provide a powerful toolkit that results in tight bounds for various topologies including the aforementioned ones. The meeting time is defined as the worst-case expected time required for two random walks to arrive at the same node at the same time. As a general result, we establish that for graphs whose meeting time is only marginally larger than the mixing time (a factor of log <sup>2</sup><i>n</i>), the coalescence time of <i>n</i> random walks equals the meeting time up to constant factors. This upper bound is complemented by the construction of a graph family demonstrating that this result is the best possible up to constant factors. Finally, we prove a tight worst case bound for the coalescence time of <i>O</i>(<i>n</i><sup>3</sup>). By duality, our results yield identical bounds on the voter model. </p><p>Our techniques also yield a new bound on the hitting time and cover time of regular graphs, improving and tightening previous results by Broder and Karlin [12], as well as those by Aldous and Fill [2].</p>","PeriodicalId":50922,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Algorithms","volume":"1 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Algorithms","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3576900","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Coalescing random walks is a fundamental distributed process, where a set of particles perform independent discrete-time random walks on an undirected graph. Whenever two or more particles meet at a given node, they merge and continue as a single random walk. The coalescence time is defined as the expected time until only one particle remains, starting from one particle at every node. Despite recent progress such as by Cooper et al. [14] and Cooper et al. [19], the coalescence time for graphs such as binary trees, d-dimensional tori, hypercubes and more generally, vertex-transitive graphs, remains unresolved.
We provide a powerful toolkit that results in tight bounds for various topologies including the aforementioned ones. The meeting time is defined as the worst-case expected time required for two random walks to arrive at the same node at the same time. As a general result, we establish that for graphs whose meeting time is only marginally larger than the mixing time (a factor of log 2n), the coalescence time of n random walks equals the meeting time up to constant factors. This upper bound is complemented by the construction of a graph family demonstrating that this result is the best possible up to constant factors. Finally, we prove a tight worst case bound for the coalescence time of O(n3). By duality, our results yield identical bounds on the voter model.
Our techniques also yield a new bound on the hitting time and cover time of regular graphs, improving and tightening previous results by Broder and Karlin [12], as well as those by Aldous and Fill [2].
期刊介绍:
ACM Transactions on Algorithms welcomes submissions of original research of the highest quality dealing with algorithms that are inherently discrete and finite, and having mathematical content in a natural way, either in the objective or in the analysis. Most welcome are new algorithms and data structures, new and improved analyses, and complexity results. Specific areas of computation covered by the journal include
combinatorial searches and objects;
counting;
discrete optimization and approximation;
randomization and quantum computation;
parallel and distributed computation;
algorithms for
graphs,
geometry,
arithmetic,
number theory,
strings;
on-line analysis;
cryptography;
coding;
data compression;
learning algorithms;
methods of algorithmic analysis;
discrete algorithms for application areas such as
biology,
economics,
game theory,
communication,
computer systems and architecture,
hardware design,
scientific computing