Concordance of Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in the Detection of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) and Ros Proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) Gene Rearrangements in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: A 4.5-Year Experience Highlighting Challenges and Pitfalls.

Aruna Nambirajan, Ridhi Sood, Warisa Khatoon, Prabhat Singh Malik, Anant Mohan, Deepali Jain
{"title":"Concordance of Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in the Detection of Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) and Ros Proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) Gene Rearrangements in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma: A 4.5-Year Experience Highlighting Challenges and Pitfalls.","authors":"Aruna Nambirajan, Ridhi Sood, Warisa Khatoon, Prabhat Singh Malik, Anant Mohan, Deepali Jain","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0229-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>ALK and ROS1 rearrangements are essential biomarkers to be tested in advanced lung adenocarcinomas. While D5F3 Ventana assay is a companion diagnostic for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-targeted therapy, immunohistochemistry is only a screening tool for detecting ROS1 rearrangement. Confirmation by cytogenetic or molecular techniques is necessary.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To evaluate the utility of ALK and ROS1 fluorescence in situ hybridization as a complement to immunohistochemistry in routine predictive biomarker testing algorithms.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>The study was ambispective, spanning 4.5 years during which lung adenocarcinoma samples were subjected to EGFR mutation testing by real-time polymerase chain reaction and ALK/ROS1 rearrangement testing by immunohistochemistry (Ventana D5F3 assay for anaplastic lymphoma kinase protein; manual assay with D4D6 clone for Ros proto-oncogene 1 protein). Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed in all anaplastic lymphoma kinase equivocal and Ros proto-oncogene 1 immunopositive cases.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Of 1874 samples included, EGFR mutations were detected in 27% (481 of 1796). Anaplastic lymphoma kinase immunohistochemistry was positive in 10% (174 of 1719) and equivocal in 3% (58 of 1719) of samples tested. ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization showed 81% (77 of 95) concordance with immunohistochemistry. Ros proto-oncogene 1 immunopositivity was noted in 13% (190 of 1425) of cases, with hybridization-confirmed rearrangements in 19.3% (26 of 135) of samples, all of which showed diffuse, strong- to moderate-intensity, cytoplasmic staining in tumor cells. Ros proto-oncogene 1 protein overexpression without rearrangement was significantly common in EGFR-mutant and ALK-rearranged adenocarcinomas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Immunostaining is a robust method for ALK-rearrangement testing, with fluorescence in situ hybridization adding value in the rare equivocal stained case. ROS1-rearrangement testing is more cost-effective if immunohistochemistry is followed by fluorescence in situ hybridization after excluding EGFR-mutant and ALK-rearranged adenocarcinomas.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2023-0229-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: ALK and ROS1 rearrangements are essential biomarkers to be tested in advanced lung adenocarcinomas. While D5F3 Ventana assay is a companion diagnostic for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-targeted therapy, immunohistochemistry is only a screening tool for detecting ROS1 rearrangement. Confirmation by cytogenetic or molecular techniques is necessary.

Objective.—: To evaluate the utility of ALK and ROS1 fluorescence in situ hybridization as a complement to immunohistochemistry in routine predictive biomarker testing algorithms.

Design.—: The study was ambispective, spanning 4.5 years during which lung adenocarcinoma samples were subjected to EGFR mutation testing by real-time polymerase chain reaction and ALK/ROS1 rearrangement testing by immunohistochemistry (Ventana D5F3 assay for anaplastic lymphoma kinase protein; manual assay with D4D6 clone for Ros proto-oncogene 1 protein). Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed in all anaplastic lymphoma kinase equivocal and Ros proto-oncogene 1 immunopositive cases.

Results.—: Of 1874 samples included, EGFR mutations were detected in 27% (481 of 1796). Anaplastic lymphoma kinase immunohistochemistry was positive in 10% (174 of 1719) and equivocal in 3% (58 of 1719) of samples tested. ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization showed 81% (77 of 95) concordance with immunohistochemistry. Ros proto-oncogene 1 immunopositivity was noted in 13% (190 of 1425) of cases, with hybridization-confirmed rearrangements in 19.3% (26 of 135) of samples, all of which showed diffuse, strong- to moderate-intensity, cytoplasmic staining in tumor cells. Ros proto-oncogene 1 protein overexpression without rearrangement was significantly common in EGFR-mutant and ALK-rearranged adenocarcinomas.

Conclusions.—: Immunostaining is a robust method for ALK-rearrangement testing, with fluorescence in situ hybridization adding value in the rare equivocal stained case. ROS1-rearrangement testing is more cost-effective if immunohistochemistry is followed by fluorescence in situ hybridization after excluding EGFR-mutant and ALK-rearranged adenocarcinomas.

免疫组化和荧光原位杂交在检测非小细胞肺癌中的淋巴瘤激酶 (ALK) 和蔷薇原癌基因 1 (ROS1) 基因重排中的一致性:4.5 年的经验突显了挑战和陷阱。
背景ALK和ROS1重排是检测晚期肺腺癌的重要生物标志物。D5F3 Ventana 检测是无性淋巴瘤激酶靶向治疗的辅助诊断方法,而免疫组化只是检测 ROS1 重排的筛选工具。有必要通过细胞遗传学或分子技术进行确认:评估ALK和ROS1荧光原位杂交作为免疫组化在常规预测性生物标记物检测算法中的补充作用:该研究为前瞻性研究,历时4年半,在此期间对肺腺癌样本进行了表皮生长因子受体实时聚合酶链反应突变检测和ALK/ROS1重排免疫组化检测(Ventana D5F3检测无性淋巴瘤激酶蛋白;用D4D6克隆手动检测Ros原癌基因1蛋白)。对所有无性淋巴瘤激酶蛋白检测不明确和Ros原癌基因1免疫阳性的病例进行了荧光原位杂交:在纳入的 1874 例样本中,27%(1796 例中的 481 例)检测到表皮生长因子受体突变。在检测的样本中,10%(1719 例中的 174 例)的无性淋巴瘤激酶免疫组化呈阳性,3%(1719 例中的 58 例)的无性淋巴瘤激酶免疫组化呈阴性。ALK荧光原位杂交与免疫组化的一致性为81%(95例中的77例)。13%的病例(1425 例中有 190 例)发现 Ros 原癌基因 1 免疫阳性,19.3%的样本(135 例中有 26 例)通过杂交证实存在重排,所有重排均表现为肿瘤细胞弥漫性、强到中等强度的胞浆染色。在表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变和ALK基因重排的腺癌中,Ros原癌基因1蛋白过表达而无重排的情况非常普遍:免疫染色是检测ALK重排的一种可靠方法,荧光原位杂交在罕见的染色不明确病例中具有附加价值。如果在排除表皮生长因子受体突变和ALK重排腺癌后再进行荧光原位杂交,则ROS1重排检测更具成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信