Correction of Spinal Sagittal Alignment after Posterior Lumbar Decompression: Does Severity of Central Canal Stenosis Matter?

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Asian Spine Journal Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-05 DOI:10.31616/asj.2023.0075
Delano Trenchfield, Yunsoo Lee, Mark Lambrechts, Nicholas D'Antonio, Jeremy Heard, John Paulik, Sydney Somers, Jeffrey Rihn, Mark Kurd, David Kaye, Jose Canseco, Alan Hilibrand, Alexander Vaccaro, Christopher Kepler, Gregory Schroeder
{"title":"Correction of Spinal Sagittal Alignment after Posterior Lumbar Decompression: Does Severity of Central Canal Stenosis Matter?","authors":"Delano Trenchfield, Yunsoo Lee, Mark Lambrechts, Nicholas D'Antonio, Jeremy Heard, John Paulik, Sydney Somers, Jeffrey Rihn, Mark Kurd, David Kaye, Jose Canseco, Alan Hilibrand, Alexander Vaccaro, Christopher Kepler, Gregory Schroeder","doi":"10.31616/asj.2023.0075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>This study adopted a retrospective study design.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Our study aimed to investigate the impact of central canal stenosis severity on surgical outcomes and lumbar sagittal correction after lumbar decompression.</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>Studies have evaluated sagittal correction in patients with central canal stenosis after lumbar decompression and the association of stenosis severity with worse preoperative sagittal alignment. However, none have evaluated the impact of spinal stenosis severity on sagittal correction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing posterior lumbar decompression (PLD) of ≤4 levels were divided into severe and non-severe central canal stenosis groups based on the Lee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) grading system. Patients without preoperative MRI or inadequate visualization on radiographs were excluded. Surgical characteristics, clinical outcomes, and sagittal measurements were compared. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine the predictors of pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), and pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 142 patients included, 39 had severe stenosis, and 103 had non-severe stenosis. The mean follow-up duration for the cohort was 4.72 months. Patients with severe stenosis were older, had higher comorbidity indices and levels decompressed, and longer lengths of stay and operative times (p <0.001). Although those with severe stenosis had lower lordosis, lower SS, and higher PI-LL mismatch preoperatively, no differences in Delta LL, SS, PT, or PI-LL were observed between the two groups (p >0.05). On multivariate regression, severe stenosis was a significant predictor of a lower preoperative LL (estimate=-5.243, p =0.045) and a higher preoperative PI-LL mismatch (estimate=6.192, p =0.039). No differences in surgical or clinical outcomes were observed (p >0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Severe central lumbar stenosis was associated with greater spinopelvic mismatch preoperatively. Sagittal balance improved in both patients with severe and non-severe stenosis after PLD to a similar degree, with differences in sagittal parameters remaining after surgery. We also found no differences in postoperative outcomes associated with stenosis severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10764140/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2023.0075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: This study adopted a retrospective study design.

Purpose: Our study aimed to investigate the impact of central canal stenosis severity on surgical outcomes and lumbar sagittal correction after lumbar decompression.

Overview of literature: Studies have evaluated sagittal correction in patients with central canal stenosis after lumbar decompression and the association of stenosis severity with worse preoperative sagittal alignment. However, none have evaluated the impact of spinal stenosis severity on sagittal correction.

Methods: Patients undergoing posterior lumbar decompression (PLD) of ≤4 levels were divided into severe and non-severe central canal stenosis groups based on the Lee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) grading system. Patients without preoperative MRI or inadequate visualization on radiographs were excluded. Surgical characteristics, clinical outcomes, and sagittal measurements were compared. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine the predictors of pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), and pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis (PI-LL).

Results: Of the 142 patients included, 39 had severe stenosis, and 103 had non-severe stenosis. The mean follow-up duration for the cohort was 4.72 months. Patients with severe stenosis were older, had higher comorbidity indices and levels decompressed, and longer lengths of stay and operative times (p <0.001). Although those with severe stenosis had lower lordosis, lower SS, and higher PI-LL mismatch preoperatively, no differences in Delta LL, SS, PT, or PI-LL were observed between the two groups (p >0.05). On multivariate regression, severe stenosis was a significant predictor of a lower preoperative LL (estimate=-5.243, p =0.045) and a higher preoperative PI-LL mismatch (estimate=6.192, p =0.039). No differences in surgical or clinical outcomes were observed (p >0.05).

Conclusion: Severe central lumbar stenosis was associated with greater spinopelvic mismatch preoperatively. Sagittal balance improved in both patients with severe and non-severe stenosis after PLD to a similar degree, with differences in sagittal parameters remaining after surgery. We also found no differences in postoperative outcomes associated with stenosis severity.

腰椎后路减压后椎矢状位矫正:中央椎管狭窄的严重程度重要吗?
研究设计:本研究采用回顾性研究设计。目的:本研究旨在探讨中央椎管狭窄严重程度对腰椎减压术后手术效果和腰椎矢状面矫正的影响。文献综述:研究评估了腰椎减压后中央椎管狭窄患者的矢状面矫正,以及狭窄严重程度与术前矢状面对齐不良的关系。然而,没有人评估椎管狭窄严重程度对矢状面矫正的影响。方法:采用Lee磁共振成像(MRI)分级系统,将后路腰椎减压(PLD)≤4节段的患者分为重度和非重度中央管狭窄组。没有术前MRI检查或x线片显示不足的患者被排除在外。比较手术特点、临床结果和矢状面测量。采用多变量logistic回归来确定骨盆倾斜(PT)、骶骨倾斜(SS)、腰椎前凸(LL)和骨盆发生率减去腰椎前凸(PI-LL)的预测因子。结果:142例患者中,39例重度狭窄,103例非重度狭窄。该队列的平均随访时间为4.72个月。严重狭窄患者年龄较大,合并症指数和减压水平较高,住院时间和手术时间较长(p < 0.05)。在多因素回归中,严重狭窄是术前低LL(估计=-5.243,p =0.045)和术前高PI-LL不匹配(估计=6.192,p =0.039)的显著预测因子。两组手术及临床结果均无差异(p >0.05)。结论:术前严重的中央腰椎管狭窄与较大的椎盂失配相关。PLD后严重和非严重狭窄患者的矢状面平衡均有相似程度的改善,但术后矢状面参数仍存在差异。我们还发现与狭窄严重程度相关的术后结果没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
108
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信