A Simple Strategy for Identifying Conserved Features across Non-independent Omics Studies.

Eric Reed, Paola Sebastiani
{"title":"A Simple Strategy for Identifying Conserved Features across Non-independent Omics Studies.","authors":"Eric Reed, Paola Sebastiani","doi":"10.1101/2023.11.22.568276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>False discovery is an ever-present concern in omics research, especially for burgeoning technologies with unvetted specificity of their biomolecular measurements, as such unknowns obscure the ability to characterize biologically informative features from studies performed with any single platform. Accordingly, performing replication studies of the same samples using different omics platforms is a viable strategy for identifying high-confidence molecular associations that are conserved across studies. However, an important caveat of replication studies that include the same samples is that they are inherently non-independent, leading to overestimating conservation if studies are treated otherwise. Strategies for accounting for such inter-study dependencies have been proposed for meta-analysis methods devised to increase statistical power to detect molecular associations in one or more studies. Still, they are not immediately suited for identifying conserved molecular associations across multiple studies. Here, we present a unifying strategy for performing inter-study conservation analysis as an alternative to meta-analysis strategies for aggregating summary statistical results of shared features across complementary studies while accounting for inter-study dependency. This method, which we call \"adjusted maximum p-value\" (AdjMaxP), is easy to implement with inter-study dependency and conservation estimated directly from the p-values from each study's molecular feature-level association testing results. Through simulation-based assessment, we demonstrate AdjMaxP's improved performance for accurately identifying conserved features over a related meta-analysis strategy for non-independent studies. AdjMaxP offers an easily implementable strategy for improving the precision of analyses for biomarker discovery from cross-platform omics study designs, thereby facilitating the adoption of such protocols for robust inference from emerging omics technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72407,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10690236/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.22.568276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

False discovery is an ever-present concern in omics research, especially for burgeoning technologies with unvetted specificity of their biomolecular measurements, as such unknowns obscure the ability to characterize biologically informative features from studies performed with any single platform. Accordingly, performing replication studies of the same samples using different omics platforms is a viable strategy for identifying high-confidence molecular associations that are conserved across studies. However, an important caveat of replication studies that include the same samples is that they are inherently non-independent, leading to overestimating conservation if studies are treated otherwise. Strategies for accounting for such inter-study dependencies have been proposed for meta-analysis methods devised to increase statistical power to detect molecular associations in one or more studies. Still, they are not immediately suited for identifying conserved molecular associations across multiple studies. Here, we present a unifying strategy for performing inter-study conservation analysis as an alternative to meta-analysis strategies for aggregating summary statistical results of shared features across complementary studies while accounting for inter-study dependency. This method, which we call "adjusted maximum p-value" (AdjMaxP), is easy to implement with inter-study dependency and conservation estimated directly from the p-values from each study's molecular feature-level association testing results. Through simulation-based assessment, we demonstrate AdjMaxP's improved performance for accurately identifying conserved features over a related meta-analysis strategy for non-independent studies. AdjMaxP offers an easily implementable strategy for improving the precision of analyses for biomarker discovery from cross-platform omics study designs, thereby facilitating the adoption of such protocols for robust inference from emerging omics technologies.

在非独立组学研究中识别保守特征的简单策略。
错误发现是组学研究中一直存在的问题,特别是对于新兴技术,其生物分子测量的特异性未经检验,因为这些未知因素模糊了从任何单一平台进行的研究中表征生物信息特征的能力。因此,使用不同的组学平台对相同样本进行复制研究是一种可行的策略,可以确定在研究中保守的高可信度分子关联。然而,对于包括相同样本的复制研究,一个重要的警告是,它们本质上是非独立的,如果研究被其他方式处理,就会导致对保护的高估。考虑这种研究间依赖关系的策略已被提出用于荟萃分析方法,这些方法旨在提高统计能力,以检测存在于一项或多项研究中的分子关联,但不能立即适用于识别跨多项研究的保守分子关联。在这里,我们提出了一种统一的策略来执行研究间的保守分析,作为荟萃分析策略的替代方案,用于汇总互补研究之间共有特征的汇总统计结果,同时考虑研究间的依赖性。这种方法,我们称之为“调整最大p值”(adjmax),很容易实现,研究间的依赖性和保守性都是直接从每个研究的分子特征水平关联测试结果的p值中估计出来的。通过基于模拟的评估,我们证明了与非独立研究的相关荟萃分析策略相比,AdjMaxP在准确识别保守特征方面的性能有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信