Evaluating the reliability and validity of the Icelandic translation of the Mini-BESTest in rehabilitation patients: an international implication for balance assessment.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-04 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2023.2286635
Sif Gylfadottir, Solveig A Arnadottir, Selma Margret Reynisdottir, Bjartey Helgadottir, Andri Thor Sigurgeirsson, Marta Gudjonsdottir
{"title":"Evaluating the reliability and validity of the Icelandic translation of the Mini-BESTest in rehabilitation patients: an international implication for balance assessment.","authors":"Sif Gylfadottir, Solveig A Arnadottir, Selma Margret Reynisdottir, Bjartey Helgadottir, Andri Thor Sigurgeirsson, Marta Gudjonsdottir","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2023.2286635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Mini-BESTest (Balance Evaluation Systems Test) is a standardized balance evaluation tool. The psychometric properties of the Mini-BESTest are being established around the world.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Icelandic translation of the Mini-BESTest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty rehabilitation inpatients (16/14 women/men), with mixed diagnoses and a range of self-assessed balance, were assessed with the: Mini-BESTest on two occasions; Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale; Berg Balance Scale; Timed Up and Go test; and 10 Meter Walk Test. Statistical analyses included the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), Cronbach's alpha (α), Pearson's r, and the independent <i>t</i>-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Relative reliability demonstrated good test-retest (ICC<sub>3.1</sub> = 0.84), intra-rater reliability (ICC<sub>3.1</sub> = 0.86), and excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC<sub>2.1</sub> = 0.96). Absolute reliability (SEM) was 1.607, and internal consistency (α) was 0.80. Construct validity was supported by a high correlation between the Mini-BESTest and other standardized measures (<i>r</i> =  ±0.6-0.73). The Mini-BESTest discriminated between patients with poor versus good self-rated balance (<i>p</i> ˂ 0.001), with no floor or ceiling effects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The psychometric properties of the Icelandic translation of the Mini-BESTest are comparable with the original version and other translations. These results for this mixed patient group should be relevant to clinicians and researchers internationally.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"2925-2934"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2286635","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Mini-BESTest (Balance Evaluation Systems Test) is a standardized balance evaluation tool. The psychometric properties of the Mini-BESTest are being established around the world.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Icelandic translation of the Mini-BESTest.

Methods: Thirty rehabilitation inpatients (16/14 women/men), with mixed diagnoses and a range of self-assessed balance, were assessed with the: Mini-BESTest on two occasions; Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale; Berg Balance Scale; Timed Up and Go test; and 10 Meter Walk Test. Statistical analyses included the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), Cronbach's alpha (α), Pearson's r, and the independent t-test.

Results: Relative reliability demonstrated good test-retest (ICC3.1 = 0.84), intra-rater reliability (ICC3.1 = 0.86), and excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC2.1 = 0.96). Absolute reliability (SEM) was 1.607, and internal consistency (α) was 0.80. Construct validity was supported by a high correlation between the Mini-BESTest and other standardized measures (r =  ±0.6-0.73). The Mini-BESTest discriminated between patients with poor versus good self-rated balance (p ˂ 0.001), with no floor or ceiling effects.

Conclusion: The psychometric properties of the Icelandic translation of the Mini-BESTest are comparable with the original version and other translations. These results for this mixed patient group should be relevant to clinicians and researchers internationally.

评估康复患者迷你最佳的冰岛语翻译的信度和效度:平衡评估的国际意义。
背景:Mini-BESTest(平衡评估系统测试)是一个标准化的平衡评估工具。迷你best的心理测量特性正在世界各地建立。目的:本研究旨在评估迷你best的冰岛语翻译的信度和效度。方法:对30例康复住院患者(16/14男/ 16),混合诊断和一系列自评平衡,分别进行2次mini - best评估;特定活动平衡信心量表;伯格平衡量表;计时Up和Go测试;和10米步行测试。统计分析包括类内相关系数(ICC)、计量标准误差(SEM)、Cronbach’s α (α)、Pearson’s r和独立t检验。结果:相对信度表现为良好的重测信度(ICC3.1 = 0.84),评分内信度(ICC3.1 = 0.86),评分间信度(ICC2.1 = 0.96)。绝对信度(SEM)为1.607,内部一致性(α)为0.80。Mini-BESTest与其他标准化测量之间的高度相关(r =±0.6-0.73)支持结构效度。mini - best区分自我评定平衡差和良好的患者(p小于0.001),没有下限或上限效应。结论:迷你best的冰岛语翻译的心理测量学特征与原文和其他翻译具有可比性。这些混合患者组的结果应该与国际临床医生和研究人员相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信