An analysis of long-term survival after pneumonectomy for lung cancer: A retrospective study of 20 years.

IF 0.7 Q3 Medicine
ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-03 DOI:10.1177/02184923231212657
Ramanish Ravishankar, Azar Hussain, Salman Arif, Tanveer Khan, Michael Gooseman, Vasileios Tentzeris, Michael Cowen, Syed Qadri
{"title":"An analysis of long-term survival after pneumonectomy for lung cancer: A retrospective study of 20 years.","authors":"Ramanish Ravishankar, Azar Hussain, Salman Arif, Tanveer Khan, Michael Gooseman, Vasileios Tentzeris, Michael Cowen, Syed Qadri","doi":"10.1177/02184923231212657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The incidence of pneumonectomy for lung cancer in the UK is continuing to decline in the era of minimally invasive thoracic surgery totalling approximately 3.5% of lung cancer resections annually. Literature is lacking for long-term survival of pneumonectomies. This study updates our previous results. Between 1998 and 2008, 206 patients underwent pneumonectomy compared to 98 patients between 2009 and 2018.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 1998 until December 2018, 304 patients underwent pneumonectomy. This was a retrospective study; data was analysed for age, gender, laterality, histology and time period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Operative mortality was 4.3% overall which was lower than the national average of 5.8%. In the last five years, there were no in-hospital, operative or 30-day mortality. During this period, 90-day mortality was 9.2%. Left-sided pneumonectomies had significantly better overall survival (3.00 vs. 2.03 years; <i>p</i> = 0.0015), squamous cell carcinoma (3.23 vs. 1.54 years; <i>p</i> = 0.00012) as well as those aged less than 70 (2.79 vs. 2.13 years; <i>p</i> = 0.011). There was no significant difference in survival between gender (<i>p</i> = 0.48). Intervention from 1998 to 2008 had significantly greater survival compared to the latter 10 years (2.68 vs. 2.46 years; <i>p</i> = 0.031). The Cox model shows that laterality, age, histology and time period remain significant with multivariate testing. No patient survived after 16 years.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our updated retrospective study has built on our previous results by reinforcing the success of pneumonectomies. The incidence of pneumonectomies is likely to decrease with the deployment of nation-wide lung cancer screening in the UK due to earlier detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":35950,"journal":{"name":"ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS","volume":" ","pages":"11-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASIAN CARDIOVASCULAR & THORACIC ANNALS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02184923231212657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The incidence of pneumonectomy for lung cancer in the UK is continuing to decline in the era of minimally invasive thoracic surgery totalling approximately 3.5% of lung cancer resections annually. Literature is lacking for long-term survival of pneumonectomies. This study updates our previous results. Between 1998 and 2008, 206 patients underwent pneumonectomy compared to 98 patients between 2009 and 2018.

Methods: From January 1998 until December 2018, 304 patients underwent pneumonectomy. This was a retrospective study; data was analysed for age, gender, laterality, histology and time period.

Results: Operative mortality was 4.3% overall which was lower than the national average of 5.8%. In the last five years, there were no in-hospital, operative or 30-day mortality. During this period, 90-day mortality was 9.2%. Left-sided pneumonectomies had significantly better overall survival (3.00 vs. 2.03 years; p = 0.0015), squamous cell carcinoma (3.23 vs. 1.54 years; p = 0.00012) as well as those aged less than 70 (2.79 vs. 2.13 years; p = 0.011). There was no significant difference in survival between gender (p = 0.48). Intervention from 1998 to 2008 had significantly greater survival compared to the latter 10 years (2.68 vs. 2.46 years; p = 0.031). The Cox model shows that laterality, age, histology and time period remain significant with multivariate testing. No patient survived after 16 years.

Discussion: Our updated retrospective study has built on our previous results by reinforcing the success of pneumonectomies. The incidence of pneumonectomies is likely to decrease with the deployment of nation-wide lung cancer screening in the UK due to earlier detection.

肺癌全肺切除术后长期生存分析:20年回顾性研究。
导读:在微创胸外科时代,英国肺癌全肺切除术的发生率持续下降,每年约占肺癌切除术的3.5%。文献缺乏关于肺切除术的长期生存。这项研究更新了我们以前的结果。1998年至2008年期间,206名患者接受了全肺切除术,而2009年至2018年期间为98名患者。方法:从1998年1月到2018年12月,304例患者接受了全肺切除术。这是一项回顾性研究;对数据进行年龄、性别、侧卧、组织学和时间段的分析。结果:手术死亡率为4.3%,低于全国平均水平5.8%。在过去五年中,没有住院、手术或30天内死亡。在此期间,90天死亡率为9.2%。左侧肺切除术的总生存期明显更好(3.00 vs 2.03年;P = 0.0015),鳞状细胞癌(3.23 vs. 1.54年;P = 0.00012),年龄小于70岁者(2.79 vs. 2.13;p = 0.011)。性别间生存率无显著差异(p = 0.48)。与后10年相比,1998 - 2008年干预的生存率显著提高(2.68年vs 2.46年;p = 0.031)。Cox模型显示,在多变量检验中,偏侧性、年龄、组织学和时间段仍然显著。16年后没有患者存活。讨论:我们最新的回顾性研究是建立在我们之前的研究结果的基础上,强调了肺切除术的成功。在英国,由于早期发现,随着全国范围内肺癌筛查的部署,肺切除术的发生率可能会降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: The Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals is an international peer-reviewed journal pertaining to cardiovascular and thoracic medicine. Besides original clinical manuscripts, we welcome research reports, product reviews, reports of new techniques, and findings of special significance to Asia and the Pacific Rim. Case studies that have significant novel original observations, are instructive, include adequate methodological details and provide conclusions. Workshop proceedings, meetings and book reviews, letters to the editor, and meeting announcements are encouraged along with relevant articles from authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信