Proplast as a pharyngeal wall implant to correct velopharyngeal insufficiency.

The Cleft palate journal Pub Date : 1989-04-01
L M Wolford, M Oelschlaeger, R Deal
{"title":"Proplast as a pharyngeal wall implant to correct velopharyngeal insufficiency.","authors":"L M Wolford,&nbsp;M Oelschlaeger,&nbsp;R Deal","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Proplast I was used as posterior pharyngeal wall implant to correct velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) in 26 patients. Specific criteria were followed in patient selection. Follow-up ranged from 4 months to 124 months. Postoperatively, 18 patients had elimination of VPI and three patients had minimal residual VPI. Four patients lost the implants secondary to infection with residual VPI. One patient had significant residual VPI without the loss of the implant. Based on long-term follow-up, no migration of the implant was seen and there was no detectable effect on subsequent facial growth. Predictably better results were achieved with younger patients in whom smaller implants were used. Conclusions from this study indicate that Proplast I is an acceptable pharyngeal wall implant material to correct VPI when the specific criteria are met and good surgical technique is used.</p>","PeriodicalId":76622,"journal":{"name":"The Cleft palate journal","volume":"26 2","pages":"119-26; discussion 126-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cleft palate journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Proplast I was used as posterior pharyngeal wall implant to correct velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) in 26 patients. Specific criteria were followed in patient selection. Follow-up ranged from 4 months to 124 months. Postoperatively, 18 patients had elimination of VPI and three patients had minimal residual VPI. Four patients lost the implants secondary to infection with residual VPI. One patient had significant residual VPI without the loss of the implant. Based on long-term follow-up, no migration of the implant was seen and there was no detectable effect on subsequent facial growth. Predictably better results were achieved with younger patients in whom smaller implants were used. Conclusions from this study indicate that Proplast I is an acceptable pharyngeal wall implant material to correct VPI when the specific criteria are met and good surgical technique is used.

前质体作为咽壁植入物矫正腭咽功能不全。
应用Proplast I作为咽后壁种植体治疗腭咽功能不全(VPI) 26例。患者的选择遵循特定的标准。随访时间为4 ~ 124个月。术后18例患者VPI消除,3例患者VPI残留极小。4例患者因残留VPI感染而丢失种植体。1例患者有明显的VPI残留,但种植体没有丢失。根据长期随访,未观察到植入物的移动,对随后的面部生长没有可检测到的影响。可以预见的是,使用较小种植体的年轻患者取得了更好的结果。本研究的结论表明,当符合特定的标准并使用良好的手术技术时,Proplast I是一种可接受的咽壁种植材料来纠正VPI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信