{"title":"The Thai version of difficulties in emotion regulation scale-short form: Validation among undergraduate students","authors":"Pornpan Srisopa , Saifone Moungkum , Pornpat Hengudomsub , Ruangdech Sirikit","doi":"10.1016/j.mhp.2023.200309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Emotion regulation plays an important role in an individual's psychological and social functions. The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale – Short Form (DERS-SF) has been chosen to investigate its psychometric properties.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To develop the Thai version of the scale and examine construct validity, internal consistency, concurrent validity, criterion-related validity, and floor and ceiling effects of the scale.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A cross-sectional survey design</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>400 undergraduate students were recruited and completed a self-report online questionnaire including a demographic form, the Thai version of DERS-SF, and The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The Thai version of DERS-SF was developed following the Beaton translation process. Confirmatory factor analyses, Cronbach's alpha, Pearson's correlations, and T-test were used.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The Thai version of the DERS-SF without Awareness provided a good fit with good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.88). The scale presented a moderate correlation with depression (<em>r</em> = 0.58), anxiety (<em>r</em> = 0.57), and stress (<em>r</em> = 0.67) (all <em>p</em> < 0.05). Students who reported higher scores on the scale tended to experience inadequate income (<em>t</em>-test = 2.82 <em>p</em> < 0.01), mental illness history (<em>t</em>-test = -2.73 <em>p</em> < 0.05), and stressful life-event in the past six months (<em>t</em>-test = -3.95 <em>p</em> < 0.001). Eight items of the scale presented the floor effect while one item had a ceiling effect.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Thai version of the DERS-SF without Awareness exhibited good psychometric properties. The scale would be useful for future research and clinical work to assess emotion regulation among Thai university students.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55864,"journal":{"name":"Mental Health and Prevention","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 200309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Health and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221265702300051X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Emotion regulation plays an important role in an individual's psychological and social functions. The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale – Short Form (DERS-SF) has been chosen to investigate its psychometric properties.
Objective
To develop the Thai version of the scale and examine construct validity, internal consistency, concurrent validity, criterion-related validity, and floor and ceiling effects of the scale.
Design
A cross-sectional survey design
Participants
400 undergraduate students were recruited and completed a self-report online questionnaire including a demographic form, the Thai version of DERS-SF, and The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale.
Methods
The Thai version of DERS-SF was developed following the Beaton translation process. Confirmatory factor analyses, Cronbach's alpha, Pearson's correlations, and T-test were used.
Results
The Thai version of the DERS-SF without Awareness provided a good fit with good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.88). The scale presented a moderate correlation with depression (r = 0.58), anxiety (r = 0.57), and stress (r = 0.67) (all p < 0.05). Students who reported higher scores on the scale tended to experience inadequate income (t-test = 2.82 p < 0.01), mental illness history (t-test = -2.73 p < 0.05), and stressful life-event in the past six months (t-test = -3.95 p < 0.001). Eight items of the scale presented the floor effect while one item had a ceiling effect.
Conclusion
The Thai version of the DERS-SF without Awareness exhibited good psychometric properties. The scale would be useful for future research and clinical work to assess emotion regulation among Thai university students.