De-sounding echo chambers: Simulation-based analysis of polarization dynamics in social networks

Q1 Social Sciences
Tim Donkers, Jürgen Ziegler
{"title":"De-sounding echo chambers: Simulation-based analysis of polarization dynamics in social networks","authors":"Tim Donkers,&nbsp;Jürgen Ziegler","doi":"10.1016/j.osnem.2023.100275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As online social networks have become dominant platforms for public discourse worldwide, there is growing anecdotal evidence of a concurrent rise in social antagonisms. Yet, while the increase in polarization is evident, the extent to which these digital communication ecosystems are driving this shift remains elusive. A dominant scholarly perspective suggests that digital social media lead to the compartmentalization of information channels, potentially culminating in the emergence of <em>echo chambers</em>. However, a growing body of empirical research suggests that the mechanisms influencing ideological demarcation are more complex than a complete communicative decoupling of user groups. This study introduces two intertwined principles that elucidate the dynamics of digital communication: First, socio-cognitive biases of social group formation enforce internal congruence of ideological communities by demarcation from outsiders. Second, algorithmic personalization of content contributes to ideological network formation by creating social redundancy, wherein the same individuals frequently interact in various roles, such as authors, recipients, or disseminators of messages, leading to a surplus of shared ideological fragments. Leveraging these insights, we pioneer a computational simulation model, integrating machine learning based on behavioral data and established recommendation technologies, to explore the evolution of social network structures in digital exchanges. Utilizing advanced methods in opinion dynamics, our model uniquely captures both the algorithmic delivery and the subsequent dissemination of messages by users. Our findings reveal that in ambiguous debate scenarios, the dual components of our model are essential to accurately capture the emergence of social polarization. Consequently, our model offers a forward-looking perspective on the evolution of network communication, facilitating nuanced comparisons with empirical graph benchmarks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52228,"journal":{"name":"Online Social Networks and Media","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468696423000344/pdfft?md5=63d57f3bfbfbb90e78b38200b817651b&pid=1-s2.0-S2468696423000344-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Social Networks and Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468696423000344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As online social networks have become dominant platforms for public discourse worldwide, there is growing anecdotal evidence of a concurrent rise in social antagonisms. Yet, while the increase in polarization is evident, the extent to which these digital communication ecosystems are driving this shift remains elusive. A dominant scholarly perspective suggests that digital social media lead to the compartmentalization of information channels, potentially culminating in the emergence of echo chambers. However, a growing body of empirical research suggests that the mechanisms influencing ideological demarcation are more complex than a complete communicative decoupling of user groups. This study introduces two intertwined principles that elucidate the dynamics of digital communication: First, socio-cognitive biases of social group formation enforce internal congruence of ideological communities by demarcation from outsiders. Second, algorithmic personalization of content contributes to ideological network formation by creating social redundancy, wherein the same individuals frequently interact in various roles, such as authors, recipients, or disseminators of messages, leading to a surplus of shared ideological fragments. Leveraging these insights, we pioneer a computational simulation model, integrating machine learning based on behavioral data and established recommendation technologies, to explore the evolution of social network structures in digital exchanges. Utilizing advanced methods in opinion dynamics, our model uniquely captures both the algorithmic delivery and the subsequent dissemination of messages by users. Our findings reveal that in ambiguous debate scenarios, the dual components of our model are essential to accurately capture the emergence of social polarization. Consequently, our model offers a forward-looking perspective on the evolution of network communication, facilitating nuanced comparisons with empirical graph benchmarks.

消声回音室:基于仿真的社会网络极化动态分析
随着在线社交网络成为全球公共话语的主导平台,越来越多的轶事证据表明,社会对立也在同时上升。然而,尽管两极分化的加剧是显而易见的,但这些数字通信生态系统在多大程度上推动了这种转变,仍然难以捉摸。一种占主导地位的学术观点认为,数字社交媒体导致了信息渠道的划分,最终可能导致回音室的出现。然而,越来越多的实证研究表明,影响意识形态划分的机制比用户群体的完全沟通解耦更为复杂。本研究引入了两个相互交织的原则,阐明了数字通信的动态:首先,社会群体形成的社会认知偏见通过与外界划清界限来加强意识形态社区的内部一致性。其次,内容的算法个性化通过创造社会冗余有助于意识形态网络的形成,其中相同的个体经常以不同的角色互动,例如信息的作者,接受者或传播者,导致共享的意识形态碎片过剩。利用这些见解,我们开创了一种计算模拟模型,将基于行为数据的机器学习与已建立的推荐技术相结合,探索数字交换中社交网络结构的演变。利用先进的意见动态方法,我们的模型独特地捕获了算法传递和用户随后的信息传播。我们的研究结果表明,在模棱两可的辩论场景中,我们模型的双重成分对于准确捕捉社会两极分化的出现至关重要。因此,我们的模型为网络通信的演变提供了前瞻性的视角,便于与经验图基准进行细致的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Online Social Networks and Media
Online Social Networks and Media Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
44 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信