Role of Oncology Advanced Practitioners to Enhance Clinical Research.

Christa Braun-Inglis, Leigh M Boehmer, Laura J Zitella, Brianna Hoffner, Yurii B Shvetsov, Jeffrey L Berenberg, Randall A Oyer, Al B Benson
{"title":"Role of Oncology Advanced Practitioners to Enhance Clinical Research.","authors":"Christa Braun-Inglis, Leigh M Boehmer, Laura J Zitella, Brianna Hoffner, Yurii B Shvetsov, Jeffrey L Berenberg, Randall A Oyer, Al B Benson","doi":"10.6004/jadpro.2022.13.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Oncology advanced practitioners (APs), including nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, physician assistants, and clinical pharmacists contribute significantly to quality cancer care. Advanced practitioners enhance value across the spectrum of cancer care. Research is an underdeveloped component of quality care, as well as an underdeveloped component of AP practice. Understanding research-related attitudes and roles of APs could lead to enhanced clinical trial accrual, conduct, and protocol development.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide survey addressing attitudes, beliefs, and roles of APs regarding clinical research was distributed by the Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC) and Harborside in early 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>408 oncology APs completed the survey. Thirty-five percent practice in an academic setting and 62% in the community. Nearly all respondents believe clinical trials are important to improve care, and over 90% report clinical trials are available at their practice. About 80% report being comfortable discussing the topic of clinical trials with patients and are involved in the care of trial participants. Sixty percent are comfortable discussing available trials, and 38% routinely explore available trials with patients. While 70% report approaching eligible patients about trials, only 20% report doing so \"a great deal\" or \"a lot.\" Ninety percent report that APs should play a role in clinical research, and 73% want to be more involved. Barriers identified to greater AP clinical trial involvement include lack of time, inadequate awareness of trial specifics, and a lack of a formal role in protocol development and leadership.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Advanced practitioners are engaged and interested in clinical trials and believe clinical research is important to improve cancer care. Multidisciplinary team integration, trials-related education, and policy change are needed to employ APs to their full potential within cancer clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":94110,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology","volume":"13 2","pages":"107-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8955568/pdf/","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jadpro.2022.13.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Oncology advanced practitioners (APs), including nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, physician assistants, and clinical pharmacists contribute significantly to quality cancer care. Advanced practitioners enhance value across the spectrum of cancer care. Research is an underdeveloped component of quality care, as well as an underdeveloped component of AP practice. Understanding research-related attitudes and roles of APs could lead to enhanced clinical trial accrual, conduct, and protocol development.

Methods: A nationwide survey addressing attitudes, beliefs, and roles of APs regarding clinical research was distributed by the Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC) and Harborside in early 2020.

Results: 408 oncology APs completed the survey. Thirty-five percent practice in an academic setting and 62% in the community. Nearly all respondents believe clinical trials are important to improve care, and over 90% report clinical trials are available at their practice. About 80% report being comfortable discussing the topic of clinical trials with patients and are involved in the care of trial participants. Sixty percent are comfortable discussing available trials, and 38% routinely explore available trials with patients. While 70% report approaching eligible patients about trials, only 20% report doing so "a great deal" or "a lot." Ninety percent report that APs should play a role in clinical research, and 73% want to be more involved. Barriers identified to greater AP clinical trial involvement include lack of time, inadequate awareness of trial specifics, and a lack of a formal role in protocol development and leadership.

Conclusions: Advanced practitioners are engaged and interested in clinical trials and believe clinical research is important to improve cancer care. Multidisciplinary team integration, trials-related education, and policy change are needed to employ APs to their full potential within cancer clinical trials.

肿瘤学高级从业人员在加强临床研究中的作用。
背景:肿瘤学高级从业人员(APs),包括执业护士、临床专科护士、医师助理和临床药师,对高质量的癌症护理做出了重要贡献。先进的从业者提高整个癌症护理的价值。研究是优质护理的一个不发达的组成部分,也是AP实践的一个不发达的组成部分。了解与研究相关的态度和ap的作用可以促进临床试验的累积、实施和方案的制定。方法:社区癌症中心协会(ACCC)和Harborside于2020年初在全国范围内开展了一项调查,探讨了ap对临床研究的态度、信念和作用。结果:408名肿瘤学ap完成调查。35%的人在学校实习,62%的人在社区实习。几乎所有的应答者都认为临床试验对改善护理很重要,超过90%的人报告在他们的实践中可以进行临床试验。大约80%的人报告说,与患者讨论临床试验的话题很舒服,并参与了试验参与者的护理。60%的人愿意讨论可用的试验,38%的人经常与患者探讨可用的试验。虽然70%的人报告说他们接近了符合条件的患者,但只有20%的人说他们“做了很多”或“很多”。90%的人认为ap应该在临床研究中发挥作用,73%的人希望更多地参与其中。确定更多AP临床试验参与的障碍包括缺乏时间,对试验细节的认识不足,以及在方案制定和领导中缺乏正式角色。结论:高级从业人员对临床试验感兴趣,认为临床研究对提高癌症治疗水平很重要。为了在癌症临床试验中充分发挥ap的潜力,需要多学科团队整合、试验相关教育和政策改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信