Self-Reported Consumption of Bottled Water v. Tap Water in Appalachian and Non-Appalachian Kentucky.

Journal of Appalachian health Pub Date : 2023-08-01 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.13023/jah.0502.04
Jason W Marion
{"title":"Self-Reported Consumption of Bottled Water v. Tap Water in Appalachian and Non-Appalachian Kentucky.","authors":"Jason W Marion","doi":"10.13023/jah.0502.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Quantitative studies on drinking water perceptions in Appalachia are limited. High-profile water infrastructure failures in the U.S. and Eastern Kentucky, coupled with human-made and natural disasters in the Appalachian Region, have likely impacted opinions regarding tap water.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To use existing unexplored data to describe baseline tap water v. bottled water consumption in Kentucky.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Telephone-based cross-sectional data were obtained from the 2013 Kentucky Health Issues Poll (KHIP) directed by the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky. Among many items in KHIP, self-reported consumption of bottled water over tap water, reasons for bottled water use, and demographic data were obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among Appalachian (n=356) and non-Appalachian (n=1,125) Kentucky respondents, a significantly higher frequency of Appalachian Kentuckians reported drinking bottled water more often than tap water relative to non-Appalachian Kentuckians (57% v. 34%; <i>X</i><sup>2</sup> p < 0.001). Appalachian residency significantly predicted bottled water consumption in simple and multivariable logistic regression adjusted for significant covariates (i.e., age, sex, and race). Among persons consuming bottled water more than tap water, Appalachian Kentuckians reported significantly more concerns regarding tap water taste or smell (<i>p</i> = 0.005) and safety (<i>p</i> = 0.008) than non-Appalachians.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>These results from 2013 data pre-date headline news items related to public water and likely underestimate current bottled water preferences. New data are needed, and these results warrant further investigation into tap water aesthetics in Appalachia, bottled water consumption impacts on personal finances, and approaches to build public trust for public drinking water among multiple populations including Appalachian Kentuckians.</p>","PeriodicalId":73599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Appalachian health","volume":"5 2","pages":"32-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629886/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Appalachian health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13023/jah.0502.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Quantitative studies on drinking water perceptions in Appalachia are limited. High-profile water infrastructure failures in the U.S. and Eastern Kentucky, coupled with human-made and natural disasters in the Appalachian Region, have likely impacted opinions regarding tap water.

Purpose: To use existing unexplored data to describe baseline tap water v. bottled water consumption in Kentucky.

Methods: Telephone-based cross-sectional data were obtained from the 2013 Kentucky Health Issues Poll (KHIP) directed by the Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky. Among many items in KHIP, self-reported consumption of bottled water over tap water, reasons for bottled water use, and demographic data were obtained.

Results: Among Appalachian (n=356) and non-Appalachian (n=1,125) Kentucky respondents, a significantly higher frequency of Appalachian Kentuckians reported drinking bottled water more often than tap water relative to non-Appalachian Kentuckians (57% v. 34%; X2 p < 0.001). Appalachian residency significantly predicted bottled water consumption in simple and multivariable logistic regression adjusted for significant covariates (i.e., age, sex, and race). Among persons consuming bottled water more than tap water, Appalachian Kentuckians reported significantly more concerns regarding tap water taste or smell (p = 0.005) and safety (p = 0.008) than non-Appalachians.

Implications: These results from 2013 data pre-date headline news items related to public water and likely underestimate current bottled water preferences. New data are needed, and these results warrant further investigation into tap water aesthetics in Appalachia, bottled water consumption impacts on personal finances, and approaches to build public trust for public drinking water among multiple populations including Appalachian Kentuckians.

肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚地区和非阿巴拉契亚地区瓶装水与自来水的自我报告消费量。
引言:对阿巴拉契亚地区饮用水认知的定量研究是有限的。美国和肯塔基州东部备受瞩目的供水基础设施故障,加上阿巴拉契亚地区的人为和自然灾害,很可能影响了人们对自来水的看法。目的:利用现有的未开发数据来描述肯塔基州自来水和瓶装水的基线消耗。方法:基于电话的横断面数据来自由健康肯塔基基金会指导的2013年肯塔基州健康问题民意调查(KHIP)。在KHIP的许多项目中,获得了瓶装水消费量超过自来水的自我报告,瓶装水使用的原因和人口统计数据。结果:在阿巴拉契亚(n=356)和非阿巴拉契亚(n= 1125)肯塔基州的受访者中,与非阿巴拉契亚肯塔基人相比,阿巴拉契亚肯塔基人报告饮用瓶装水的频率明显高于自来水(57% vs . 34%;X2 p < 0.001)。阿巴拉契亚居住显著预测瓶装水消费量的简单和多变量逻辑回归调整显著协变量(即年龄,性别和种族)。在饮用瓶装水多于自来水的人群中,阿巴拉契亚肯塔基人比非阿巴拉契亚人更关注自来水的味道或气味(p = 0.005)和安全性(p = 0.008)。启示:这些数据来自2013年的数据,早于与公共水相关的头条新闻,可能低估了当前瓶装水的偏好。需要新的数据,这些结果需要进一步调查阿巴拉契亚地区的自来水美学,瓶装水消费对个人财务的影响,以及在包括阿巴拉契亚肯塔基人在内的多个人群中建立公众对公共饮用水信任的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信