Piloting an Oral History Approach to Investigate Cancer Perspectives Among Residents of Appalachian Kentucky.

Journal of Appalachian health Pub Date : 2023-04-01 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.13023/jah.0501.07
Courtney Martin, Lauren Hudson, Nathan L Vanderford
{"title":"Piloting an Oral History Approach to Investigate Cancer Perspectives Among Residents of Appalachian Kentucky.","authors":"Courtney Martin, Lauren Hudson, Nathan L Vanderford","doi":"10.13023/jah.0501.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Kentucky ranks first in the U.S. in overall cancer incidence and mortality rates. Areas of the state that fall within the Appalachian Region, along Kentucky's eastern border, experience disproportionately high rates of cancer compared to non-Appalachian counties. Purpose: This pilot study investigates whether oral history interviews can be used to understand perspectives on cancer among residents of Appalachian Kentucky.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2020, participants (n = 5) who identified as being from and/or having strong connections to Appalachian Kentucky were recruited to participate in this pilot study. Participants included individuals working in cancer-related fields, oncology professionals, and those with personal cancer experience. Using an oral history approach, subjects were asked about challenges within Appalachia that contribute to high rates of cancer regionally. Interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis, and data were condensed into themes, subthemes, and subtopics. Relational content analysis was then used to illustrate relationships between the problems being faced in Appalachia and their contributing factors, with potential solutions to those problems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six key themes emerged from analysis of the oral history interviews: (1) problems being faced in Appalachia; (2) contributing factors; (3) potential solutions; (4) Appalachian disposition; (5) experiences with and thoughts on cancer; and (6) defining success v. the future without changes (intervention). A further 25 subthemes were identified from within these themes. Taken together, these themes and subthemes point to potential areas for specific intervention to shift Appalachia's cancer burden.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>This pilot study demonstrates potential benefit in using oral history interviews to elucidate Appalachian Kentuckians' perspectives on cancer. From the nuanced insights gained through this method, a set of culturally appropriate interventions were identified that could address the disproportionate cancer burden in the region. Future studies using an oral history approach could aim to reveal other specific aspects of how cancer impacts individuals, families, and communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":73599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Appalachian health","volume":"5 1","pages":"95-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10629891/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Appalachian health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13023/jah.0501.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Kentucky ranks first in the U.S. in overall cancer incidence and mortality rates. Areas of the state that fall within the Appalachian Region, along Kentucky's eastern border, experience disproportionately high rates of cancer compared to non-Appalachian counties. Purpose: This pilot study investigates whether oral history interviews can be used to understand perspectives on cancer among residents of Appalachian Kentucky.

Methods: In 2020, participants (n = 5) who identified as being from and/or having strong connections to Appalachian Kentucky were recruited to participate in this pilot study. Participants included individuals working in cancer-related fields, oncology professionals, and those with personal cancer experience. Using an oral history approach, subjects were asked about challenges within Appalachia that contribute to high rates of cancer regionally. Interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis, and data were condensed into themes, subthemes, and subtopics. Relational content analysis was then used to illustrate relationships between the problems being faced in Appalachia and their contributing factors, with potential solutions to those problems.

Results: Six key themes emerged from analysis of the oral history interviews: (1) problems being faced in Appalachia; (2) contributing factors; (3) potential solutions; (4) Appalachian disposition; (5) experiences with and thoughts on cancer; and (6) defining success v. the future without changes (intervention). A further 25 subthemes were identified from within these themes. Taken together, these themes and subthemes point to potential areas for specific intervention to shift Appalachia's cancer burden.

Implications: This pilot study demonstrates potential benefit in using oral history interviews to elucidate Appalachian Kentuckians' perspectives on cancer. From the nuanced insights gained through this method, a set of culturally appropriate interventions were identified that could address the disproportionate cancer burden in the region. Future studies using an oral history approach could aim to reveal other specific aspects of how cancer impacts individuals, families, and communities.

在肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚地区居民中试行口述历史方法来调查癌症观点。
简介:肯塔基州的癌症发病率和死亡率在美国排名第一。与非阿巴拉契亚县相比,位于肯塔基州东部边界的阿巴拉契亚地区的癌症发病率高得不成比例。目的:本初步研究探讨口述历史访谈是否可用于了解肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚地区居民对癌症的看法。方法:2020年,被确定为来自和/或与肯塔基州阿巴拉契亚地区有密切联系的参与者(n = 5)被招募参加这项试点研究。参与者包括在癌症相关领域工作的个人、肿瘤学专业人士和有癌症经历的人。采用口述历史的方法,研究对象被问及阿巴拉契亚地区的挑战,这些挑战导致了该地区的高癌症发病率。访谈采用定性内容分析进行分析,数据被浓缩为主题、副主题和副主题。然后,使用关系内容分析来说明阿巴拉契亚面临的问题与造成这些问题的因素之间的关系,以及这些问题的潜在解决方案。结果:通过对口述历史访谈的分析,得出了六个关键主题:(1)阿巴拉契亚地区面临的问题;(二)形成因素;(3)可能的解决方案;(4)阿巴拉契亚性格;(5)对癌症的经历和看法;(6)定义成功与不改变(干预)的未来。从这些主题中又确定了25个次级主题。综上所述,这些主题和次主题指出了具体干预的潜在领域,以改变阿巴拉契亚地区的癌症负担。含义:这项初步研究表明,使用口述历史访谈来阐明阿巴拉契亚肯塔基人对癌症的看法可能有益。通过这种方法获得的细致入微的见解,确定了一套文化上适当的干预措施,可以解决该地区不成比例的癌症负担。使用口述历史方法的未来研究可以旨在揭示癌症如何影响个人,家庭和社区的其他具体方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信