Ultra-brief cognitive-behavioral therapy (for routine primary care visits: Feasibility and acceptability of a brief provider training workshop.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Families Systems & Health Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-30 DOI:10.1037/fsh0000862
Julia M Terman, Kelly J Rohan, Raquel Castillo Cruz, Emily Greenberger
{"title":"Ultra-brief cognitive-behavioral therapy (for routine primary care visits: Feasibility and acceptability of a brief provider training workshop.","authors":"Julia M Terman, Kelly J Rohan, Raquel Castillo Cruz, Emily Greenberger","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Most Americans with symptoms of depression and anxiety receive treatment exclusively from their primary care providers (PCPs). Existing primary care interventions typically do not occur within the initial patient interaction, rely on delivery by mental health specialists, and have lengthy training programs. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of the training workshop for an ultra-brief cognitive-behavioral therapy (UB-CBT) single-session intervention for depression and anxiety symptoms that was developed to address these barriers.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The 1-hr UB-CBT training workshop was piloted in 2021 with 38 providers at three adult primary care and five family medicine sites in Vermont. PCPs completed questionnaires after the training workshop. Data were collected in 2021 with a sample of participants who were primarily women (66%) and white (82%). We used a concurrent triangulation design integrating mixed-methods data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most providers found the training highly feasible and acceptable. The majority agreed or strongly agreed that the workshop provided sufficient training for using the intervention (91%), they were satisfied with the UB-CBT intervention (92%), and the intervention seemed easy to administer (97%). Qualitative findings highlighted that providers especially liked the user-friendliness and general feasibility of the intervention, but had some concerns about time.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We outlined several steps that will address PCPs' concerns to improve the UB-CBT training experience and intervention. Future research should examine the effectiveness of the UB-CBT intervention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":" ","pages":"559-569"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families Systems & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000862","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Most Americans with symptoms of depression and anxiety receive treatment exclusively from their primary care providers (PCPs). Existing primary care interventions typically do not occur within the initial patient interaction, rely on delivery by mental health specialists, and have lengthy training programs. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of the training workshop for an ultra-brief cognitive-behavioral therapy (UB-CBT) single-session intervention for depression and anxiety symptoms that was developed to address these barriers.

Method: The 1-hr UB-CBT training workshop was piloted in 2021 with 38 providers at three adult primary care and five family medicine sites in Vermont. PCPs completed questionnaires after the training workshop. Data were collected in 2021 with a sample of participants who were primarily women (66%) and white (82%). We used a concurrent triangulation design integrating mixed-methods data.

Results: Most providers found the training highly feasible and acceptable. The majority agreed or strongly agreed that the workshop provided sufficient training for using the intervention (91%), they were satisfied with the UB-CBT intervention (92%), and the intervention seemed easy to administer (97%). Qualitative findings highlighted that providers especially liked the user-friendliness and general feasibility of the intervention, but had some concerns about time.

Discussion: We outlined several steps that will address PCPs' concerns to improve the UB-CBT training experience and intervention. Future research should examine the effectiveness of the UB-CBT intervention. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

超简短的认知行为疗法(用于常规初级保健访问):简短的提供者培训研讨会的可行性和可接受性。
大多数有抑郁和焦虑症状的美国人只接受他们的初级保健提供者(pcp)的治疗。现有的初级保健干预通常不发生在最初的患者互动中,依赖于精神卫生专家的交付,并且有冗长的培训计划。本研究评估了超简短认知行为疗法(UB-CBT)单次干预抑郁和焦虑症状的培训研讨会的可行性和可接受性,这些干预是为了解决这些障碍而开发的。方法:1小时的UB-CBT培训研讨会于2021年在佛蒙特州的3个成人初级保健和5个家庭医学站点的38个提供者中进行了试点。学员在培训工作坊后填写问卷。数据于2021年收集,样本参与者主要是女性(66%)和白人(82%)。我们使用了一个结合混合方法数据的并发三角测量设计。结果:大多数提供者认为培训是可行和可接受的。大多数人同意或强烈同意研讨会为使用干预提供了足够的培训(91%),他们对UB-CBT干预(92%)感到满意,干预似乎易于实施(97%)。定性调查结果强调,提供者特别喜欢干预的用户友好性和总体可行性,但对时间有一些担忧。讨论:我们概述了几个步骤,以解决pcp关注的问题,以改善UB-CBT培训经验和干预。未来的研究应该检验UB-CBT干预的有效性。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Families Systems & Health
Families Systems & Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Families, Systems, & Health publishes clinical research, training, and theoretical contributions in the areas of families and health, with particular focus on collaborative family healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信