Intensified acute in-hospital physiotherapy for patients after hip fracture surgery: a pragmatic, randomized, controlled feasibility trial.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Disability and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1080/09638288.2023.2288672
Camilla Kampp Zilmer, Morten Tange Kristensen, S Peter Magnusson, Inger Birgitte Bährentz, Thomas Giver Jensen, Signe Østergaard Zoffmann, Henrik Palm, Theresa Bieler
{"title":"Intensified acute in-hospital physiotherapy for patients after hip fracture surgery: a pragmatic, randomized, controlled feasibility trial.","authors":"Camilla Kampp Zilmer, Morten Tange Kristensen, S Peter Magnusson, Inger Birgitte Bährentz, Thomas Giver Jensen, Signe Østergaard Zoffmann, Henrik Palm, Theresa Bieler","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2023.2288672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Intensified acute in-hospital physiotherapy (IP) after hip fracture (HF) may enhance patient's ability to regain basic mobility at discharge. The primary objective was to assess the feasibility of IP. Secondary to estimate the effect of IP on regained basic mobility at discharge.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In a pragmatic, randomized, unblinded feasibility trial, 60 patients (mean age 79 years, 41 women) with HF and an independent pre-fracture basic mobility level were randomized (2:1) to IP with two daily sessions on weekdays focusing on functional training and weight-bearing activities (<i>n</i> = 40) versus usual care (UC) physiotherapy once daily (<i>n</i> = 20). Feasibility outcomes included physiotherapy completion rates, reasons for non-successful completion, and adverse events. The primary effect outcome was recovery of basic mobility (Cumulated Ambulation Score (CAS)).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-two percent of the sessions in the IP group were successfully- or partially completed versus 94% of the sessions in the UC group. No adverse events occurred. The main reason for not completing physiotherapy was fatigue. At discharge (median 7 days), 50% in the IP group had regained their pre-fracture basic mobility level (CAS = 6) versus 16% in the UC group; odds ratio = 5.33, 95%CI [1.3;21.5].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IP seems feasible for patients after HF surgery, and it may enhance recovery. Fatigue was the primary obstacle to completing IP.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2023.2288672","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Intensified acute in-hospital physiotherapy (IP) after hip fracture (HF) may enhance patient's ability to regain basic mobility at discharge. The primary objective was to assess the feasibility of IP. Secondary to estimate the effect of IP on regained basic mobility at discharge.

Materials and methods: In a pragmatic, randomized, unblinded feasibility trial, 60 patients (mean age 79 years, 41 women) with HF and an independent pre-fracture basic mobility level were randomized (2:1) to IP with two daily sessions on weekdays focusing on functional training and weight-bearing activities (n = 40) versus usual care (UC) physiotherapy once daily (n = 20). Feasibility outcomes included physiotherapy completion rates, reasons for non-successful completion, and adverse events. The primary effect outcome was recovery of basic mobility (Cumulated Ambulation Score (CAS)).

Results: Eighty-two percent of the sessions in the IP group were successfully- or partially completed versus 94% of the sessions in the UC group. No adverse events occurred. The main reason for not completing physiotherapy was fatigue. At discharge (median 7 days), 50% in the IP group had regained their pre-fracture basic mobility level (CAS = 6) versus 16% in the UC group; odds ratio = 5.33, 95%CI [1.3;21.5].

Conclusions: IP seems feasible for patients after HF surgery, and it may enhance recovery. Fatigue was the primary obstacle to completing IP.

髋部骨折术后患者强化急性住院物理治疗:一项实用、随机、对照的可行性试验。
目的:髋部骨折(HF)后强化急性住院物理治疗(IP)可提高患者出院时恢复基本活动能力。主要目的是评估知识产权的可行性。其次,估计IP对放电时恢复基本活动能力的影响。材料和方法:在一项实用的、随机的、非盲的可行性试验中,60名HF患者(平均年龄79岁,41名女性)和独立的骨折前基本活动水平被随机(2:1)分配到每天两次的IP,在工作日集中于功能训练和负重活动(n = 40)和每天一次的常规护理(UC)物理治疗(n = 20)。可行性结局包括物理治疗完成率、未成功完成的原因和不良事件。主要疗效指标为基本活动能力恢复(累积活动评分(CAS))。结果:IP组82%的会话成功或部分完成,而UC组为94%。无不良事件发生。未完成物理治疗的主要原因是疲劳。出院时(中位7天),50%的IP组恢复了骨折前的基本活动能力水平(CAS = 6),而16%的UC组;优势比= 5.33,95%CI[1.3;21.5]。结论:对心衰手术后患者进行IP治疗是可行的,并可促进康复。疲劳是完成IP的主要障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disability and Rehabilitation
Disability and Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
415
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信