Differences in use of Veterans Health Administration and non-Veterans Health Administration hospitals by rural and urban Veterans after access expansions

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Matthew P. Dizon MD, Kenneth W. Kizer MD, MPH, Michael K. Ong MD, PhD, Ciaran S. Phibbs PhD, Megan E. Vanneman PhD, Emily P. Wong MPH, MPA, Yue Zhang PhD, Jean Yoon PhD, MHS
{"title":"Differences in use of Veterans Health Administration and non-Veterans Health Administration hospitals by rural and urban Veterans after access expansions","authors":"Matthew P. Dizon MD,&nbsp;Kenneth W. Kizer MD, MPH,&nbsp;Michael K. Ong MD, PhD,&nbsp;Ciaran S. Phibbs PhD,&nbsp;Megan E. Vanneman PhD,&nbsp;Emily P. Wong MPH, MPA,&nbsp;Yue Zhang PhD,&nbsp;Jean Yoon PhD, MHS","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To examine changes in rural and urban Veterans’ utilization of acute inpatient care in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and non-VHA hospitals following access expansion from the Veterans Choice Act, which expanded eligibility for VHA-paid community hospitalization.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Using repeated cross-sectional data of VHA enrollees’ hospitalizations in 9 states (AZ, CA, CT, FL, LA, MA, NY, PA, and SC) between 2012 and 2017, we compared rural and urban Veterans’ probability of admission in VHA and non-VHA hospitals by payer over time for elective and nonelective hospitalizations using multinomial logistic regression to adjust for patient-level sociodemographic features. We also used generalized linear models to compare rural and urban Veterans’ travel distances to hospitals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Over time, the probability of VHA-paid community hospitalization increased more for rural Veterans than urban Veterans. For elective inpatient care, rural Veterans’ probability of VHA-paid admission increased from 2.9% (95% CI 2.6%-3.2%) in 2012 to 6.5% (95% CI 5.8%-7.1%) in 2017. These changes were associated with a temporal trend that preceded and continued after the implementation of the Veterans Choice Act. Overall travel distances to hospitalizations were similar over time; however, the mean distance traveled decreased from 39.2 miles (95% CI 35.1-43.3) in 2012 to 32.3 miles (95% CI 30.2-34.4) in 2017 for rural Veterans receiving elective inpatient care in VHA-paid hospitals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Despite limited access to rural hospitals, these data demonstrate an increase in rural Veterans’ use of non-VHA hospitals for acute inpatient care and a small reduction in distance traveled to elective inpatient services.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12812","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To examine changes in rural and urban Veterans’ utilization of acute inpatient care in Veterans Health Administration (VHA) and non-VHA hospitals following access expansion from the Veterans Choice Act, which expanded eligibility for VHA-paid community hospitalization.

Methods

Using repeated cross-sectional data of VHA enrollees’ hospitalizations in 9 states (AZ, CA, CT, FL, LA, MA, NY, PA, and SC) between 2012 and 2017, we compared rural and urban Veterans’ probability of admission in VHA and non-VHA hospitals by payer over time for elective and nonelective hospitalizations using multinomial logistic regression to adjust for patient-level sociodemographic features. We also used generalized linear models to compare rural and urban Veterans’ travel distances to hospitals.

Findings

Over time, the probability of VHA-paid community hospitalization increased more for rural Veterans than urban Veterans. For elective inpatient care, rural Veterans’ probability of VHA-paid admission increased from 2.9% (95% CI 2.6%-3.2%) in 2012 to 6.5% (95% CI 5.8%-7.1%) in 2017. These changes were associated with a temporal trend that preceded and continued after the implementation of the Veterans Choice Act. Overall travel distances to hospitalizations were similar over time; however, the mean distance traveled decreased from 39.2 miles (95% CI 35.1-43.3) in 2012 to 32.3 miles (95% CI 30.2-34.4) in 2017 for rural Veterans receiving elective inpatient care in VHA-paid hospitals.

Conclusions

Despite limited access to rural hospitals, these data demonstrate an increase in rural Veterans’ use of non-VHA hospitals for acute inpatient care and a small reduction in distance traveled to elective inpatient services.

农村和城市退伍军人使用退伍军人健康管理局和非退伍军人健康管理局医院后的差异。
目的:研究《退伍军人选择法案》扩大了退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)和非VHA医院的准入范围后,农村和城市退伍军人对退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)和非VHA医院急性住院护理的利用情况的变化。方法:利用2012年至2017年9个州(AZ、CA、CT、FL、LA、MA、NY、PA和SC) VHA参保人住院的重复横断面数据,我们使用多项logistic回归来调整患者层面的社会人口学特征,比较农村和城市退伍军人在VHA和非VHA医院的住院概率随付款时间的变化。我们还使用广义线性模型来比较农村和城市退伍军人到医院的旅行距离。结果:随着时间的推移,农村退伍军人的vha支付的社区住院的可能性比城市退伍军人增加。对于选择性住院治疗,农村退伍军人的vha支付入院概率从2012年的2.9% (95% CI 2.6%-3.2%)增加到2017年的6.5% (95% CI 5.8%-7.1%)。这些变化与《退伍军人选择法案》实施之前和之后的时间趋势有关。随着时间的推移,到医院的总旅行距离相似;然而,在vha支付的医院接受选择性住院治疗的农村退伍军人的平均旅行距离从2012年的39.2英里(95% CI 35.1-43.3)减少到2017年的32.3英里(95% CI 30.2-34.4)。结论:尽管进入农村医院的机会有限,但这些数据表明,农村退伍军人使用非vha医院进行急性住院治疗的人数有所增加,前往选择性住院服务的路程略有减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信