Visualizing the dynamic mechanical power and time burden of mechanical ventilation patients: an analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Han Chen, Zhi-Zhong Chen, Shu-Rong Gong, Rong-Guo Yu
{"title":"Visualizing the dynamic mechanical power and time burden of mechanical ventilation patients: an analysis of the MIMIC-IV database.","authors":"Han Chen, Zhi-Zhong Chen, Shu-Rong Gong, Rong-Guo Yu","doi":"10.1186/s40560-023-00709-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limiting driving pressure and mechanical power is associated with reduced mortality risk in both patients with and without acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, it is still poorly understood how the intensity of mechanical ventilation and its corresponding duration impact the risk of mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Critically ill patients who received mechanical ventilation were identified from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database. A visualization method was developed by calculating the odds ratio of survival for all combinations of ventilation duration and intensity to assess the relationship between the intensity and duration of mechanical ventilation and the mortality risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6251 patients were included. The color-coded plot demonstrates the intuitive concept that episodes of higher dynamic mechanical power can only be tolerated for shorter durations. The three fitting contour lines represent 0%, 10%, and 20% increments in the mortality risk, respectively, and exhibit an exponential pattern: higher dynamic mechanical power is associated with an increased mortality risk with shorter exposure durations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cumulative exposure to higher intensities and/or longer duration of mechanical ventilation is associated with worse outcomes. Considering both the intensity and duration of mechanical ventilation may help evaluate patient outcomes and guide adjustments in mechanical ventilation to minimize harmful exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10685677/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-023-00709-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Limiting driving pressure and mechanical power is associated with reduced mortality risk in both patients with and without acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, it is still poorly understood how the intensity of mechanical ventilation and its corresponding duration impact the risk of mortality.

Methods: Critically ill patients who received mechanical ventilation were identified from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database. A visualization method was developed by calculating the odds ratio of survival for all combinations of ventilation duration and intensity to assess the relationship between the intensity and duration of mechanical ventilation and the mortality risk.

Results: A total of 6251 patients were included. The color-coded plot demonstrates the intuitive concept that episodes of higher dynamic mechanical power can only be tolerated for shorter durations. The three fitting contour lines represent 0%, 10%, and 20% increments in the mortality risk, respectively, and exhibit an exponential pattern: higher dynamic mechanical power is associated with an increased mortality risk with shorter exposure durations.

Conclusions: Cumulative exposure to higher intensities and/or longer duration of mechanical ventilation is associated with worse outcomes. Considering both the intensity and duration of mechanical ventilation may help evaluate patient outcomes and guide adjustments in mechanical ventilation to minimize harmful exposure.

可视化机械通气患者的动态机械功率和时间负担:MIMIC-IV数据库的分析。
背景:限制驾驶压力和机械功率与急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者和非急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者死亡风险降低相关。然而,机械通气的强度及其相应的持续时间如何影响死亡风险仍然知之甚少。方法:从重症监护医疗信息市场(MIMIC)-IV数据库中确定接受机械通气的危重患者。通过计算所有通气时间和强度组合的生存优势比,建立可视化方法来评估机械通气强度和持续时间与死亡风险之间的关系。结果:共纳入6251例患者。用颜色标注的图显示了一个直观的概念,即高动态机械功率的发作只能持续较短的时间。三条拟合轮廓线分别代表死亡风险的0%、10%和20%增量,并呈现指数模式:较高的动态机械功率与较短的暴露时间增加的死亡风险相关。结论:累积暴露于更高强度和/或更长的机械通气时间与较差的结果相关。考虑机械通气的强度和持续时间可能有助于评估患者的预后,并指导机械通气的调整,以尽量减少有害暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
1.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: "Journal of Intensive Care" is an open access journal dedicated to the comprehensive coverage of intensive care medicine, providing a platform for the latest research and clinical insights in this critical field. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including intensive and critical care, trauma and surgical intensive care, pediatric intensive care, acute and emergency medicine, perioperative medicine, resuscitation, infection control, and organ dysfunction. Recognizing the importance of cultural diversity in healthcare practices, "Journal of Intensive Care" also encourages submissions that explore and discuss the cultural aspects of intensive care, aiming to promote a more inclusive and culturally sensitive approach to patient care. By fostering a global exchange of knowledge and expertise, the journal contributes to the continuous improvement of intensive care practices worldwide.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信