Long-term evaluation of combined prosthetic-surgical approach and soft tissue augmentation in the esthetic zone.

Q4 Dentistry
David Nazarian, Viktoriia Olegovna Dzhuganova, Anastasia Nefedkina, Georgy Zakharov, Aleksander Fedosov, Grigoriy Kyalov, Arbak Khachatryan
{"title":"Long-term evaluation of combined prosthetic-surgical approach and soft tissue augmentation in the esthetic zone.","authors":"David Nazarian, Viktoriia Olegovna Dzhuganova, Anastasia Nefedkina, Georgy Zakharov, Aleksander Fedosov, Grigoriy Kyalov, Arbak Khachatryan","doi":"10.34172/joddd.2023.40593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is no standard protocol for immediate implant placement and subsequent loading in the smile zone. We aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of simultaneous implant placement, soft tissue grafting, and immediate prosthetic loading in the esthetic zone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-five implants were placed in the maxillary aesthetic zone. Twenty-two patients were evaluated using the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) and White Esthetic Score (WES). Also, the degree of peri-implant bone resorption and patient survey were applied for the esthetic and functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The esthetic and harmonizing outcomes were achieved according to the mean total PES/WES value (17.9±2.0). The mean overall PES was 8.5±1.66. The papilla level had the highest mean score (1.8±0.36). Furthermore, the combination of root convexity/color and soft tissue color and texture was one of the key values in evaluating the effectiveness of this method (the mean value was 1.5±0.5). The mesial and distal papillae were 1.6±0.5 and 1.8±0.4, respectively. None of the 35 implants reached below 6 points (which is considered an esthetically unsatisfactory result). The mean WES score was 9.5±0.57. The average degree of total peri-implant bone resorption was 1.05±0.3 mm after 12 months. According to the questionnaire, all the patients smiled without hesitation and were satisfied with the treatment (100%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that restoring one or more teeth in the smile zone using the concept of one-stage implant placement, soft tissue flap augmentation, and loading with provisional crowns was an esthetically successful and predictable method.</p>","PeriodicalId":15599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects","volume":"17 3","pages":"170-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10676532/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2023.40593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is no standard protocol for immediate implant placement and subsequent loading in the smile zone. We aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of simultaneous implant placement, soft tissue grafting, and immediate prosthetic loading in the esthetic zone.

Methods: Thirty-five implants were placed in the maxillary aesthetic zone. Twenty-two patients were evaluated using the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) and White Esthetic Score (WES). Also, the degree of peri-implant bone resorption and patient survey were applied for the esthetic and functional outcomes.

Results: The esthetic and harmonizing outcomes were achieved according to the mean total PES/WES value (17.9±2.0). The mean overall PES was 8.5±1.66. The papilla level had the highest mean score (1.8±0.36). Furthermore, the combination of root convexity/color and soft tissue color and texture was one of the key values in evaluating the effectiveness of this method (the mean value was 1.5±0.5). The mesial and distal papillae were 1.6±0.5 and 1.8±0.4, respectively. None of the 35 implants reached below 6 points (which is considered an esthetically unsatisfactory result). The mean WES score was 9.5±0.57. The average degree of total peri-implant bone resorption was 1.05±0.3 mm after 12 months. According to the questionnaire, all the patients smiled without hesitation and were satisfied with the treatment (100%).

Conclusion: This study showed that restoring one or more teeth in the smile zone using the concept of one-stage implant placement, soft tissue flap augmentation, and loading with provisional crowns was an esthetically successful and predictable method.

假体-外科联合入路及美观区软组织增强术的长期评价。
背景:在微笑区即刻种植和随后的加载没有标准的方案。我们的目的是评估同时植入、软组织移植和在美观区立即植入假体的长期结果。方法:在上颌美观区放置35颗种植体。采用粉红色审美评分(PES)和白色审美评分(WES)对22例患者进行评价。此外,种植体周围骨吸收的程度和患者的调查应用于美学和功能的结果。结果:PES/WES平均总分(17.9±2.0)达到美观和协调效果。平均总PES为8.5±1.66。乳头水平平均评分最高(1.8±0.36)。根凸度/颜色与软组织颜色和质地的结合是评价方法有效性的关键值之一(平均值为1.5±0.5)。中、远端乳头分别为1.6±0.5和1.8±0.4。35个植入物都没有达到6分以下(这被认为是美学上不满意的结果)。平均WES评分为9.5±0.57。12个月后种植体周围骨吸收度平均为1.05±0.3 mm。根据问卷调查,所有患者都毫不犹豫地微笑,对治疗满意(100%)。结论:本研究表明,采用一期种植体、软组织瓣增强和临时冠加载的概念修复微笑区一颗或多颗牙齿是一种美观且可预测的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Dental Research Dental Clinics Dental Prospects (JODDD) is a Platinum* Open Access, peer-reviewed quarterly indexed journal that publishes articles of basic, clinical, and prospective nature in all areas of dentistry and oral health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信