Drivers of Patient and Caregiver Preferences for Growth Hormone Deficiency Treatments in France: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Hormone Research in Paediatrics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-29 DOI:10.1159/000534974
Michel Polak, Béatrice Demaret, Robin Henocque, Lylia Chachoua, Samuel Aballea, Marwa Mezghani, Daria La Torre, Lara Salvi, Philippe Touraine
{"title":"Drivers of Patient and Caregiver Preferences for Growth Hormone Deficiency Treatments in France: A Discrete Choice Experiment.","authors":"Michel Polak, Béatrice Demaret, Robin Henocque, Lylia Chachoua, Samuel Aballea, Marwa Mezghani, Daria La Torre, Lara Salvi, Philippe Touraine","doi":"10.1159/000534974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to identify drivers of preference for growth hormone deficiency (GHD) treatment in French children, and their caregivers, and to quantify the relative importance of different aspects of treatment modalities using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Attributes characterizing GHD treatment modalities were identified through a literature review, qualitative interviews, and focus groups with children, adolescents, and caregivers. A DCE questionnaire of 12 choice tasks was administered online to four groups of participants: autonomous adolescents (12-18 years), nonautonomous adolescent/caregiver dyads, caregivers of nonautonomous children (3-11 years), and autonomous children/caregiver dyads. The survey was pilot tested. A multinomial logit model with random effects was used to estimate preference weights for all attribute levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Frequency of administration, injection pain, dose setting, type of device, storage, and device reusability were selected as DCE attributes following the qualitative research phase and a pilot study. A total of 105 patients were represented in the DCE survey. Frequency of administration and injection pain were the attributes with the greatest influence on respondents' preferences and had similar importance. Weekly administration was significantly preferred over daily administration by all groups of participants. Respondents' choices were also significantly influenced by the type of device, dose setting, and device reusability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Children with GHD and their caregivers prefer a less frequent injection schedule and lower injection pain. Both aspects of treatment modalities are important to consider in treatment decisions to alleviate the daily burden for GHD patients and their families and potentially enhance treatment adherence.</p>","PeriodicalId":13025,"journal":{"name":"Hormone Research in Paediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"13-24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hormone Research in Paediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534974","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to identify drivers of preference for growth hormone deficiency (GHD) treatment in French children, and their caregivers, and to quantify the relative importance of different aspects of treatment modalities using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).

Materials and methods: Attributes characterizing GHD treatment modalities were identified through a literature review, qualitative interviews, and focus groups with children, adolescents, and caregivers. A DCE questionnaire of 12 choice tasks was administered online to four groups of participants: autonomous adolescents (12-18 years), nonautonomous adolescent/caregiver dyads, caregivers of nonautonomous children (3-11 years), and autonomous children/caregiver dyads. The survey was pilot tested. A multinomial logit model with random effects was used to estimate preference weights for all attribute levels.

Results: Frequency of administration, injection pain, dose setting, type of device, storage, and device reusability were selected as DCE attributes following the qualitative research phase and a pilot study. A total of 105 patients were represented in the DCE survey. Frequency of administration and injection pain were the attributes with the greatest influence on respondents' preferences and had similar importance. Weekly administration was significantly preferred over daily administration by all groups of participants. Respondents' choices were also significantly influenced by the type of device, dose setting, and device reusability.

Conclusion: Children with GHD and their caregivers prefer a less frequent injection schedule and lower injection pain. Both aspects of treatment modalities are important to consider in treatment decisions to alleviate the daily burden for GHD patients and their families and potentially enhance treatment adherence.

法国患者和护理人员对生长激素缺乏症治疗的偏好驱动因素:离散选择实验。
前言:确定法国儿童及其照顾者对生长激素缺乏症(GHD)治疗的偏好驱动因素,并使用离散选择实验(DCE)量化治疗方式不同方面的相对重要性。材料和方法:通过文献综述、定性访谈和针对儿童、青少年和照顾者的焦点小组来确定GHD治疗模式的特征。一份包含12个选择任务的DCE问卷在线管理给四组参与者:自主青少年(12 - 18岁)、非自主青少年/照顾者组合、非自主儿童的照顾者(3 - 11岁)和自主儿童/照顾者组合。这项调查进行了试点测试。采用随机效应的多项logit模型估计各属性层次的偏好权重。结果:在定性研究阶段和试点研究之后,选择给药频率、注射疼痛、剂量设置、器械类型、储存和器械可重用性作为DCE属性。共有105名患者参与了DCE调查。给药频率和注射疼痛是对受访者偏好影响最大的属性,具有相似的重要性。每周给药明显优于每天给药。受访者的选择也受到设备类型、剂量设置和设备可重用性的显著影响。结论:GHD患儿及其照顾者倾向于较少的注射次数和较低的注射疼痛。治疗方式的这两个方面在治疗决策中都很重要,可以减轻GHD患者及其家庭的日常负担,并可能提高治疗依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hormone Research in Paediatrics
Hormone Research in Paediatrics ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
88
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of ''Hormone Research in Paediatrics'' is to improve the care of children with endocrine disorders by promoting basic and clinical knowledge. The journal facilitates the dissemination of information through original papers, mini reviews, clinical guidelines and papers on novel insights from clinical practice. Periodic editorials from outstanding paediatric endocrinologists address the main published novelties by critically reviewing the major strengths and weaknesses of the studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信