Predicting Mortality Following Odontoid Fracture Fixation in Elderly Patients: CAADS-16 Score.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1177/21925682231220019
William ElNemer, Eric Solomon, Micheal Raad, Amit Jain, Sang Hun Lee
{"title":"Predicting Mortality Following Odontoid Fracture Fixation in Elderly Patients: CAADS-16 Score.","authors":"William ElNemer, Eric Solomon, Micheal Raad, Amit Jain, Sang Hun Lee","doi":"10.1177/21925682231220019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective Review of a National Database.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>By utilizing a national database, this study aims to quantify the predictors of 30-day mortality after odontoid fixation and guide appropriate management for patients in whom the choice between operative and non-operative management is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Database was queried using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes and International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes to identify patients 60 or older who underwent surgical fixation of an odontoid fracture from 2005 to 2020. Risk factors for mortality significant in univariate and subsequent multivariate analysis were used to develop a scoring system to predict post-operative mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>608 patients were identified. Patients were split into a non-mortality 30 days post-op group, and into a mortality 30 days post-op group. The following risk factors were included in the scoring system: functional dependency, disseminated cancer, albumin less than 3.5, WBC count greater than 16 k, anterior surgical approach, and pre-op SIRS. Using a cutoff value of 2, the CAAD-16 score had a sensitivity and specificity of 82% and 81%, respectively. The ASA score, cutoff at 4, showed a sensitivity and specificity of 64% and 75% respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This sample of 294 patients represents one of the largest samples of odontoid fracture fixation patients available in the literature and comes from a nationally representative database. We structure relevant risk factors into the CAADS-16 score, which has the potential to be a clinically relevant tool to prevent short-term postoperative mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"993-1002"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11877605/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682231220019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective Review of a National Database.

Introduction: By utilizing a national database, this study aims to quantify the predictors of 30-day mortality after odontoid fixation and guide appropriate management for patients in whom the choice between operative and non-operative management is unclear.

Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Database was queried using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes and International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes to identify patients 60 or older who underwent surgical fixation of an odontoid fracture from 2005 to 2020. Risk factors for mortality significant in univariate and subsequent multivariate analysis were used to develop a scoring system to predict post-operative mortality.

Results: 608 patients were identified. Patients were split into a non-mortality 30 days post-op group, and into a mortality 30 days post-op group. The following risk factors were included in the scoring system: functional dependency, disseminated cancer, albumin less than 3.5, WBC count greater than 16 k, anterior surgical approach, and pre-op SIRS. Using a cutoff value of 2, the CAAD-16 score had a sensitivity and specificity of 82% and 81%, respectively. The ASA score, cutoff at 4, showed a sensitivity and specificity of 64% and 75% respectively.

Conclusions: This sample of 294 patients represents one of the largest samples of odontoid fracture fixation patients available in the literature and comes from a nationally representative database. We structure relevant risk factors into the CAADS-16 score, which has the potential to be a clinically relevant tool to prevent short-term postoperative mortality.

预测老年患者齿状突骨折固定后的死亡率:CAADS-16评分。
研究设计:对国家数据库进行回顾性分析。通过利用国家数据库,本研究旨在量化齿状突固定后30天死亡率的预测因素,并指导对手术和非手术治疗的选择不明确的患者进行适当的管理。方法:使用现行程序术语(CPT)代码和国际疾病分类(ICD)代码查询美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进数据库,以识别2005年至2020年60岁及以上接受齿状突骨折手术固定的患者。在单因素和随后的多因素分析中,死亡率的危险因素被用来建立一个评分系统来预测术后死亡率。结果:共发现608例患者。患者被分为术后30天无死亡组和术后30天死亡组。评分系统包括以下危险因素:功能依赖、弥散性癌症、白蛋白小于3.5、WBC计数大于16k、前路手术入路和术前SIRS。采用截断值2,CAAD-16评分的敏感性和特异性分别为82%和81%。ASA评分的截止值为4,其敏感性和特异性分别为64%和75%。结论:294例患者的样本是文献中最大的齿状突骨折固定患者样本之一,来自全国代表性数据库。我们将相关危险因素纳入CAADS-16评分,该评分有可能成为预防术后短期死亡率的临床相关工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信