Potentially Inappropriate Psychotropic Drugs in Nursing Homes: An Italian Observational Study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Drugs & Aging Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-30 DOI:10.1007/s40266-023-01083-9
Marina Azab, Alessio Novella, Aladar Ianes, Luca Pasina
{"title":"Potentially Inappropriate Psychotropic Drugs in Nursing Homes: An Italian Observational Study.","authors":"Marina Azab, Alessio Novella, Aladar Ianes, Luca Pasina","doi":"10.1007/s40266-023-01083-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Physicians often face difficulties in selecting appropriate medications for older adults with multiple comorbidities. As people age, they are more likely to be living with a number of chronic conditions (multimorbidity) and be prescribed a high number of medications (polypharmacy). Multimorbidity is frequent in nursing home (NH) residents and the use of potentially inappropriate medications, especially psychotropic drugs, is widespread. This retrospective cross-sectional cohort study examined the frequency of potentially inappropriate psychotropic drugs using the Beers, Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (STOPP/START) and Fit fOR The Aged (FORTA) criteria, and their association with mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional cohort study was conducted on a sample of long-term care NHs across Italy. Of the 34 NHs with an electronic medical records system, 27 met the inclusion criteria, with complete web-based case report forms (CRFs). Residents under the age of 65 years were excluded. We calculated the prevalence of potentially inappropriate psychotropics drugs (antipsychotics, antidepressants and anxiolytics/hypnotics) according to three criteria for prescriptive appropriateness. Univariate and multivariate correlations were examined, taking into account age, sex, comorbidities, and the number of psychotropic drugs, to analyse the relationship between inappropriate psychotropic use and mortality rates. The rate of inappropriate psychotropic prescriptions was calculated with the prevalence of residents receiving potentially inappropriate psychotropic drugs according to the three criteria. We used a logistic model to check for a possible predictive relationship between inappropriate use of psychotropics and mortality. The study evaluated differences in prescriptive appropriateness among NHs by analysing the proportions of potentially inappropriately treated residents at the last visit. Differences were compared with the overall sample mean using confidence intervals (CIs) calculated using Wald's method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study involved 2555 residents, of whom 1908 (74.7% of the total) were treated with psychotropic drugs; 186 (7.3% of the total) were exposed to at least one psychotropic drug considered potentially inappropriate according to the FORTA criteria. Analysis using the Beers criteria showed that 1616 residents (63.2% of the total) received at least one psychotropic drug considered potentially inappropriate. In line with the Beers recommendation, patients receiving at least three psychotropic drugs were also included and 440 were identified (17.2% of the total sample). According to the STOPP criteria, 1451 residents (56.8% of the total sample) were prescribed potentially inappropriate psychotropic drugs. No correlation was found between potentially inappropriate use of psychotropic drugs and mortality, in either univariate analysis or in a multivariate model adjusted for age, sex and comorbidity index.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Different criteria for appropriate drug prescription identify very different percentages of patients in NHs exposed to psychotropics considered potentially inappropriate. The Beers and STOPP/START criteria identified a larger percentage of patients exposed in NHs than FORTA.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":"187-197"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-023-01083-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Physicians often face difficulties in selecting appropriate medications for older adults with multiple comorbidities. As people age, they are more likely to be living with a number of chronic conditions (multimorbidity) and be prescribed a high number of medications (polypharmacy). Multimorbidity is frequent in nursing home (NH) residents and the use of potentially inappropriate medications, especially psychotropic drugs, is widespread. This retrospective cross-sectional cohort study examined the frequency of potentially inappropriate psychotropic drugs using the Beers, Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (STOPP/START) and Fit fOR The Aged (FORTA) criteria, and their association with mortality.

Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional cohort study was conducted on a sample of long-term care NHs across Italy. Of the 34 NHs with an electronic medical records system, 27 met the inclusion criteria, with complete web-based case report forms (CRFs). Residents under the age of 65 years were excluded. We calculated the prevalence of potentially inappropriate psychotropics drugs (antipsychotics, antidepressants and anxiolytics/hypnotics) according to three criteria for prescriptive appropriateness. Univariate and multivariate correlations were examined, taking into account age, sex, comorbidities, and the number of psychotropic drugs, to analyse the relationship between inappropriate psychotropic use and mortality rates. The rate of inappropriate psychotropic prescriptions was calculated with the prevalence of residents receiving potentially inappropriate psychotropic drugs according to the three criteria. We used a logistic model to check for a possible predictive relationship between inappropriate use of psychotropics and mortality. The study evaluated differences in prescriptive appropriateness among NHs by analysing the proportions of potentially inappropriately treated residents at the last visit. Differences were compared with the overall sample mean using confidence intervals (CIs) calculated using Wald's method.

Results: This study involved 2555 residents, of whom 1908 (74.7% of the total) were treated with psychotropic drugs; 186 (7.3% of the total) were exposed to at least one psychotropic drug considered potentially inappropriate according to the FORTA criteria. Analysis using the Beers criteria showed that 1616 residents (63.2% of the total) received at least one psychotropic drug considered potentially inappropriate. In line with the Beers recommendation, patients receiving at least three psychotropic drugs were also included and 440 were identified (17.2% of the total sample). According to the STOPP criteria, 1451 residents (56.8% of the total sample) were prescribed potentially inappropriate psychotropic drugs. No correlation was found between potentially inappropriate use of psychotropic drugs and mortality, in either univariate analysis or in a multivariate model adjusted for age, sex and comorbidity index.

Conclusions: Different criteria for appropriate drug prescription identify very different percentages of patients in NHs exposed to psychotropics considered potentially inappropriate. The Beers and STOPP/START criteria identified a larger percentage of patients exposed in NHs than FORTA.

Abstract Image

疗养院中可能不合适的精神药物:一项意大利观察性研究。
背景和目的:医生在为患有多种合并症的老年人选择合适的药物时经常面临困难。随着人们年龄的增长,他们更有可能患有多种慢性疾病(多重疾病),并需要服用大量药物(多种药物)。多病在养老院(NH)居民中很常见,使用可能不适当的药物,特别是精神药物,是普遍存在的。本回顾性横断面队列研究使用Beers、老年人处方筛选工具/提醒医生正确治疗筛选工具(STOPP/START)和适合老年人(FORTA)标准检查潜在不适当精神药物的频率,以及它们与死亡率的关系。方法:这项回顾性横断面队列研究是对意大利长期护理NHs样本进行的。在34个拥有电子医疗记录系统的NHs中,27个符合纳入标准,具有完整的基于网络的病例报告表格(CRFs)。65岁以下的居民被排除在外。我们根据处方适当性的三个标准计算了潜在不适当的精神药物(抗精神病药、抗抑郁药和抗焦虑药/催眠药)的患病率。考虑到年龄、性别、合并症和精神药物的数量,研究了单变量和多变量相关性,以分析不适当的精神药物使用与死亡率之间的关系。根据这三个标准,结合居民服用潜在不适宜精神药物的发生率,计算精神药物处方不适宜率。我们使用逻辑模型来检验精神药物不当使用与死亡率之间可能存在的预测关系。该研究通过分析最后一次访问中可能不适当治疗的居民的比例,评估了国民保健制度中规定适当性的差异。使用Wald方法计算的置信区间(ci)将差异与总体样本均值进行比较。结果:本研究共纳入居民2555人,其中接受精神药物治疗的1908人(占总人数的74.7%);186人(占总数的7.3%)暴露于至少一种根据FORTA标准被认为可能不适当的精神药物。使用Beers标准的分析显示,1616名居民(占总数的63.2%)至少服用了一种被认为可能不合适的精神药物。根据比尔斯的建议,接受至少三种精神药物治疗的患者也被包括在内,440名患者被确定(占总样本的17.2%)。根据STOPP标准,1451名居民(占总样本的56.8%)被开具了可能不适当的精神药物。无论是单变量分析还是调整了年龄、性别和合并症指数的多变量模型,均未发现潜在的不当使用精神药物与死亡率之间存在相关性。结论:不同的适当药物处方标准确定了NHs中被认为可能不适当的精神药物暴露的患者的不同百分比。Beers和STOPP/START标准确定NHs暴露的患者比例大于FORTA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drugs & Aging
Drugs & Aging 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs & Aging delivers essential information on the most important aspects of drug therapy to professionals involved in the care of the elderly. The journal addresses in a timely way the major issues relating to drug therapy in older adults including: the management of specific diseases, particularly those associated with aging, age-related physiological changes impacting drug therapy, drug utilization and prescribing in the elderly, polypharmacy and drug interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信