Levator Ani Avulsion in Ultrasound Increases Recurrence in Sacrospinous Fixation.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.) Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-10 DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001425
Andrea Maluenda, Fernanda Santis-Moya, Diego Arévalo, Dominga Pohlhammer, Bernardita Blumel, Rodrigo Guzmán-Rojas, Javier Pizarro-Berdichevsky
{"title":"Levator Ani Avulsion in Ultrasound Increases Recurrence in Sacrospinous Fixation.","authors":"Andrea Maluenda, Fernanda Santis-Moya, Diego Arévalo, Dominga Pohlhammer, Bernardita Blumel, Rodrigo Guzmán-Rojas, Javier Pizarro-Berdichevsky","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Pelvic floor translabial ultrasound (TLUS) can identify levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion and ballooning, which some studies have shown to be possible risk factors for prolapse recurrence. Our group uses TLUS to counsel patients preoperatively. If any of these risk factors exist, we offer sacrocolpopexy over vaginal repair. However, some patients, even though they have these possible risk factors, prefer to undergo vaginal surgery.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to determine if TLUS LAM avulsion and/or ballooning are risk factors for composite outcome recurrence in patients undergoing sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This was a retrospective observational study. All patients with vaginal apical repair with sacrospinous ligament fixation with preoperative TLUS were included. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and follow-up were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed for composite outcome that included TLUS risk factors, age, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System measurements and stage, and variables with P < 0.1 in the univariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-two patients were included. All patients had symptomatic vaginal bulge; 65.4% had stage III prolapse. Concomitant hysterectomy was performed in 54.3%. Median follow-up was 20 months (interquartile range, 8-35 months); 19.8% had LAM avulsion, and 43.2% had ballooning. Anatomic recurrence rate was 23.5%, symptomatic was 22.2%, and reoperation was 1.2%. The composite recurrence rate was 29.6%. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, unilateral/bilateral avulsion in TLUS was found to be a significant risk factor for composite outcome with an odds ratio of 4.33 (confidence interval, 1.219-15.398; P = 0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Composite outcome of recurrence in our study was 29.6%. Avulsion on TLUS increased the risk of recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse by fourfold.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Pelvic floor translabial ultrasound (TLUS) can identify levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion and ballooning, which some studies have shown to be possible risk factors for prolapse recurrence. Our group uses TLUS to counsel patients preoperatively. If any of these risk factors exist, we offer sacrocolpopexy over vaginal repair. However, some patients, even though they have these possible risk factors, prefer to undergo vaginal surgery.

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine if TLUS LAM avulsion and/or ballooning are risk factors for composite outcome recurrence in patients undergoing sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse.

Study design: This was a retrospective observational study. All patients with vaginal apical repair with sacrospinous ligament fixation with preoperative TLUS were included. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and follow-up were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed for composite outcome that included TLUS risk factors, age, Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System measurements and stage, and variables with P < 0.1 in the univariate analysis.

Results: Eighty-two patients were included. All patients had symptomatic vaginal bulge; 65.4% had stage III prolapse. Concomitant hysterectomy was performed in 54.3%. Median follow-up was 20 months (interquartile range, 8-35 months); 19.8% had LAM avulsion, and 43.2% had ballooning. Anatomic recurrence rate was 23.5%, symptomatic was 22.2%, and reoperation was 1.2%. The composite recurrence rate was 29.6%. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, unilateral/bilateral avulsion in TLUS was found to be a significant risk factor for composite outcome with an odds ratio of 4.33 (confidence interval, 1.219-15.398; P = 0.023).

Conclusions: Composite outcome of recurrence in our study was 29.6%. Avulsion on TLUS increased the risk of recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse by fourfold.

超声显示提肛肌撕脱可增加骶棘固定术后复发。
重要性:盆底经唇超声(TLUS)可以识别提肛肌(LAM)撕脱和肿胀,一些研究表明这是脱垂复发的可能危险因素。我们小组在术前使用TLUS对患者进行咨询。如果存在这些危险因素,我们会选择骶colpop固定术而不是阴道修复术。然而,有些患者,即使他们有这些可能的危险因素,更愿意接受阴道手术。目的:本研究的目的是确定骶棘韧带固定治疗盆腔器官脱垂患者的TLUS LAM撕脱和/或球囊是否是复合结果复发的危险因素。研究设计:本研究为回顾性观察性研究。所有行骶棘韧带固定阴道根尖修复术的患者均纳入研究。分析了人口统计学、临床特征和随访情况。对包括TLUS危险因素、年龄、盆腔器官脱垂量化系统测量值和分期以及单因素分析中P < 0.1的变量进行多变量logistic回归分析。结果:纳入82例患者。所有患者均有症状性阴道隆起;65.4%为III期脱垂。同时行子宫切除术的占54.3%。中位随访时间为20个月(四分位数间距为8-35个月);LAM撕脱19.8%,肿胀43.2%。解剖复发率23.5%,症状性复发率22.2%,再手术率1.2%。复合复发率为29.6%。在多变量logistic回归分析中,单侧/双侧撕脱伤是影响综合结局的重要危险因素,比值比为4.33(置信区间为1.219-15.398;P = 0.023)。结论:本研究复发率为29.6%。撕脱术使盆腔器官脱垂复发的风险增加4倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信