Can the length of a catheter change the time to bubble at the tip performing the "Bubble Test"? A bench study.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Journal of Vascular Access Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-29 DOI:10.1177/11297298231199505
Davide Giustivi, Stefano Elli, Chiara Airoldi, Federica Lo Izzo, Michela Rossini, Antonio Gidaro, Alberto Lucchini, Daniele Privitera
{"title":"Can the length of a catheter change the time to bubble at the tip performing the \"Bubble Test\"? A bench study.","authors":"Davide Giustivi, Stefano Elli, Chiara Airoldi, Federica Lo Izzo, Michela Rossini, Antonio Gidaro, Alberto Lucchini, Daniele Privitera","doi":"10.1177/11297298231199505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intraprocedural tip control techniques are critical during central venous catheter placement. According to international guidelines (INS 2021), intracavitary electrocardiography is the first method of choice to verify it; when this technique is not feasible, it is considered acceptable to use a contrast-enhanced ultrasound-based tip location method, commonly known as \"bubble-test\" as an effective alternative.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether the length of the vascular catheter can alter the time between the injection of the contrast media and its appearance at the catheter tip and the injection duration. Differences between operators stratified according to experience were evaluated as secondary endpoints.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A bench study was conducted using an extracorporeal circuit. For each catheter length (60, 40, and 20 cm), three injections were obtained by each of the five operators with different levels of experience for a total of 45 measurements. Differences among operators were evaluated using ANOVA, and the impact of catheter length and operator expertise on times was assessed using repeated measurement models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hub-to-tip times of 247.33 ms (SD 168.82), 166 ms (SD 95.46), 138 ms (SD 54.48), and injection duration of 1620 ms (SD 748.58), 1614 ms (SD 570.95), 1566 ms (SD 302.83) were observed for 60, 40, 20 cm catheter length, respectively. A significant time variability between operators was observed. Moreover, moving from 60 to 20 cm, hub-to-tip time was significantly longer for 60 cm devices (<i>p</i> = 0.0124), while little differences were observed for injection duration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Catheter length can change both the time between the injection of the contrast media and its appearance at the catheter tip and the injection duration. Hub-to-tip times obtained with 20 and 40 cm and overall injection duration did not differ significantly; skilled personnel could substantially reduce both values analyzed in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"109-115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298231199505","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Intraprocedural tip control techniques are critical during central venous catheter placement. According to international guidelines (INS 2021), intracavitary electrocardiography is the first method of choice to verify it; when this technique is not feasible, it is considered acceptable to use a contrast-enhanced ultrasound-based tip location method, commonly known as "bubble-test" as an effective alternative.

Objective: To assess whether the length of the vascular catheter can alter the time between the injection of the contrast media and its appearance at the catheter tip and the injection duration. Differences between operators stratified according to experience were evaluated as secondary endpoints.

Methods: A bench study was conducted using an extracorporeal circuit. For each catheter length (60, 40, and 20 cm), three injections were obtained by each of the five operators with different levels of experience for a total of 45 measurements. Differences among operators were evaluated using ANOVA, and the impact of catheter length and operator expertise on times was assessed using repeated measurement models.

Results: Hub-to-tip times of 247.33 ms (SD 168.82), 166 ms (SD 95.46), 138 ms (SD 54.48), and injection duration of 1620 ms (SD 748.58), 1614 ms (SD 570.95), 1566 ms (SD 302.83) were observed for 60, 40, 20 cm catheter length, respectively. A significant time variability between operators was observed. Moreover, moving from 60 to 20 cm, hub-to-tip time was significantly longer for 60 cm devices (p = 0.0124), while little differences were observed for injection duration.

Conclusions: Catheter length can change both the time between the injection of the contrast media and its appearance at the catheter tip and the injection duration. Hub-to-tip times obtained with 20 and 40 cm and overall injection duration did not differ significantly; skilled personnel could substantially reduce both values analyzed in this study.

导管的长度是否会改变在尖端进行“起泡试验”的时间?长凳研究。
导言:术中尖端控制技术在中心静脉置管过程中至关重要。根据国际指南(INS 2021),腔内心电图是验证其的首选方法;当这种技术不可行时,可以考虑使用基于对比增强超声的尖端定位方法,通常称为“气泡测试”作为有效的替代方法。目的:探讨血管导管的长度是否会改变造影剂注射到导管尖端的时间和注射时间。根据经验分层的操作人员之间的差异作为次要终点进行评估。方法:采用体外电路进行实验研究。对于每一种导管长度(60、40和20 cm),五名不同经验水平的操作人员每人进行了三次注射,总共进行了45次测量。使用方差分析评估操作人员之间的差异,使用重复测量模型评估导管长度和操作人员专业知识对时间的影响。结果:在60、40、20 cm导管长度下,从中心到尖端的时间分别为247.33 ms (SD 168.82)、166 ms (SD 95.46)、138 ms (SD 54.48),注射时间分别为1620 ms (SD 748.58)、1614 ms (SD 570.95)、1566 ms (SD 302.83)。观察到操作人员之间存在显著的时间差异。此外,从60 cm移动到20 cm, 60 cm装置的中心到尖端时间明显更长(p = 0.0124),而注射时间差异不大。结论:导管长度可以改变注射造影剂到导管尖端出现的时间和注射时间。注射长度为20和40 cm时,从中心到尖端的时间和总注射时间没有显著差异;技术人员可以大大降低本研究中分析的两个值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信