Davide Giustivi, Stefano Elli, Chiara Airoldi, Federica Lo Izzo, Michela Rossini, Antonio Gidaro, Alberto Lucchini, Daniele Privitera
{"title":"Can the length of a catheter change the time to bubble at the tip performing the \"Bubble Test\"? A bench study.","authors":"Davide Giustivi, Stefano Elli, Chiara Airoldi, Federica Lo Izzo, Michela Rossini, Antonio Gidaro, Alberto Lucchini, Daniele Privitera","doi":"10.1177/11297298231199505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intraprocedural tip control techniques are critical during central venous catheter placement. According to international guidelines (INS 2021), intracavitary electrocardiography is the first method of choice to verify it; when this technique is not feasible, it is considered acceptable to use a contrast-enhanced ultrasound-based tip location method, commonly known as \"bubble-test\" as an effective alternative.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether the length of the vascular catheter can alter the time between the injection of the contrast media and its appearance at the catheter tip and the injection duration. Differences between operators stratified according to experience were evaluated as secondary endpoints.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A bench study was conducted using an extracorporeal circuit. For each catheter length (60, 40, and 20 cm), three injections were obtained by each of the five operators with different levels of experience for a total of 45 measurements. Differences among operators were evaluated using ANOVA, and the impact of catheter length and operator expertise on times was assessed using repeated measurement models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hub-to-tip times of 247.33 ms (SD 168.82), 166 ms (SD 95.46), 138 ms (SD 54.48), and injection duration of 1620 ms (SD 748.58), 1614 ms (SD 570.95), 1566 ms (SD 302.83) were observed for 60, 40, 20 cm catheter length, respectively. A significant time variability between operators was observed. Moreover, moving from 60 to 20 cm, hub-to-tip time was significantly longer for 60 cm devices (<i>p</i> = 0.0124), while little differences were observed for injection duration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Catheter length can change both the time between the injection of the contrast media and its appearance at the catheter tip and the injection duration. Hub-to-tip times obtained with 20 and 40 cm and overall injection duration did not differ significantly; skilled personnel could substantially reduce both values analyzed in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"109-115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298231199505","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Intraprocedural tip control techniques are critical during central venous catheter placement. According to international guidelines (INS 2021), intracavitary electrocardiography is the first method of choice to verify it; when this technique is not feasible, it is considered acceptable to use a contrast-enhanced ultrasound-based tip location method, commonly known as "bubble-test" as an effective alternative.
Objective: To assess whether the length of the vascular catheter can alter the time between the injection of the contrast media and its appearance at the catheter tip and the injection duration. Differences between operators stratified according to experience were evaluated as secondary endpoints.
Methods: A bench study was conducted using an extracorporeal circuit. For each catheter length (60, 40, and 20 cm), three injections were obtained by each of the five operators with different levels of experience for a total of 45 measurements. Differences among operators were evaluated using ANOVA, and the impact of catheter length and operator expertise on times was assessed using repeated measurement models.
Results: Hub-to-tip times of 247.33 ms (SD 168.82), 166 ms (SD 95.46), 138 ms (SD 54.48), and injection duration of 1620 ms (SD 748.58), 1614 ms (SD 570.95), 1566 ms (SD 302.83) were observed for 60, 40, 20 cm catheter length, respectively. A significant time variability between operators was observed. Moreover, moving from 60 to 20 cm, hub-to-tip time was significantly longer for 60 cm devices (p = 0.0124), while little differences were observed for injection duration.
Conclusions: Catheter length can change both the time between the injection of the contrast media and its appearance at the catheter tip and the injection duration. Hub-to-tip times obtained with 20 and 40 cm and overall injection duration did not differ significantly; skilled personnel could substantially reduce both values analyzed in this study.
导言:术中尖端控制技术在中心静脉置管过程中至关重要。根据国际指南(INS 2021),腔内心电图是验证其的首选方法;当这种技术不可行时,可以考虑使用基于对比增强超声的尖端定位方法,通常称为“气泡测试”作为有效的替代方法。目的:探讨血管导管的长度是否会改变造影剂注射到导管尖端的时间和注射时间。根据经验分层的操作人员之间的差异作为次要终点进行评估。方法:采用体外电路进行实验研究。对于每一种导管长度(60、40和20 cm),五名不同经验水平的操作人员每人进行了三次注射,总共进行了45次测量。使用方差分析评估操作人员之间的差异,使用重复测量模型评估导管长度和操作人员专业知识对时间的影响。结果:在60、40、20 cm导管长度下,从中心到尖端的时间分别为247.33 ms (SD 168.82)、166 ms (SD 95.46)、138 ms (SD 54.48),注射时间分别为1620 ms (SD 748.58)、1614 ms (SD 570.95)、1566 ms (SD 302.83)。观察到操作人员之间存在显著的时间差异。此外,从60 cm移动到20 cm, 60 cm装置的中心到尖端时间明显更长(p = 0.0124),而注射时间差异不大。结论:导管长度可以改变注射造影剂到导管尖端出现的时间和注射时间。注射长度为20和40 cm时,从中心到尖端的时间和总注射时间没有显著差异;技术人员可以大大降低本研究中分析的两个值。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques.
All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process.
The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level:
• Dialysis
• Oncology
• Interventional radiology
• Nutrition
• Nursing
• Intensive care
Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.