A Case Management Approach in Stroke Care: A Mixed-Methods Acceptance Analysis From the Perspective of the Medical Profession.

IF 0.8 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Professional Case Management Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-23 DOI:10.1097/NCM.0000000000000701
Juliane Andrea Duevel, Alina Baumgartner, John Grosser, Simone Kreimeier, Svenja Elkenkamp, Wolfgang Greiner
{"title":"A Case Management Approach in Stroke Care: A Mixed-Methods Acceptance Analysis From the Perspective of the Medical Profession.","authors":"Juliane Andrea Duevel, Alina Baumgartner, John Grosser, Simone Kreimeier, Svenja Elkenkamp, Wolfgang Greiner","doi":"10.1097/NCM.0000000000000701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of study: </strong>In terms of continuous and coordinated health care, cross-sectoral care structures are crucial. However, the German health care system is characterized by fragmentation of medical services and responsibilities. This fragmentation leads to multiple interfaces frequently causing loss of information, effectiveness, and quality. The concept of case management has the potential to improve cooperation between sectors and health care providers. Hence, a case management intervention for patients with stroke was evaluated with an acceptance analysis on the physicians' willingness to cooperate with stroke managers and their assessment of the potential of case management for the health care of patients with stroke.</p><p><strong>Primary practice settings: </strong>Primary practice settings included physicians working in the hospital, rehabilitation, and outpatient sectors who had actual or potential contact with a stroke case manager within the project region of East Westphalia-Lippe.</p><p><strong>Methodology and sample: </strong>The analysis was conducted using a mixed-methods approach. Expert interviews were conducted in 2020. Afterward a questionnaire was developed, which was then distributed to physicians in 2021. Both the interviews and the questionnaire included questions on conceptual knowledge and concrete expectations prior of the project, on experiences during the project and on recommendations and physicians' assessment of future organization in health care to classify and describe the acceptance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine interviews were conducted and 23 questionnaires were completed. Only slightly more than 50% of the physicians had prior knowledge of the case management approach. Overall, ambiguous results concerning the acceptance of case managers were revealed. Additional personal assistance for patients with stroke was seen as beneficial at the same time critical perspectives regarding further fragmentation of health care and overlapping of competences with existing professional groups or forms of health care were collected. General practitioners in particular were critical of the case management approach.</p><p><strong>Implications for case management practice: </strong>From the physicians' point of view, at least two changes are necessary for the project approach to be integrated into standard care. First, the target group should be adapted according to the case management approach. Second, the delegation of tasks and responsibilities to case managers should be revised. The sectoral difference in the acceptance of case managers by physicians indicates that active cooperation and communication in everyday work has direct impact on the acceptance of a new occupational profession. Physician acceptance has a significant impact on the implementation of new treatment modalities and thus influences the overall quality of health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":45015,"journal":{"name":"Professional Case Management","volume":" ","pages":"158-170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professional Case Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCM.0000000000000701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of study: In terms of continuous and coordinated health care, cross-sectoral care structures are crucial. However, the German health care system is characterized by fragmentation of medical services and responsibilities. This fragmentation leads to multiple interfaces frequently causing loss of information, effectiveness, and quality. The concept of case management has the potential to improve cooperation between sectors and health care providers. Hence, a case management intervention for patients with stroke was evaluated with an acceptance analysis on the physicians' willingness to cooperate with stroke managers and their assessment of the potential of case management for the health care of patients with stroke.

Primary practice settings: Primary practice settings included physicians working in the hospital, rehabilitation, and outpatient sectors who had actual or potential contact with a stroke case manager within the project region of East Westphalia-Lippe.

Methodology and sample: The analysis was conducted using a mixed-methods approach. Expert interviews were conducted in 2020. Afterward a questionnaire was developed, which was then distributed to physicians in 2021. Both the interviews and the questionnaire included questions on conceptual knowledge and concrete expectations prior of the project, on experiences during the project and on recommendations and physicians' assessment of future organization in health care to classify and describe the acceptance.

Results: Nine interviews were conducted and 23 questionnaires were completed. Only slightly more than 50% of the physicians had prior knowledge of the case management approach. Overall, ambiguous results concerning the acceptance of case managers were revealed. Additional personal assistance for patients with stroke was seen as beneficial at the same time critical perspectives regarding further fragmentation of health care and overlapping of competences with existing professional groups or forms of health care were collected. General practitioners in particular were critical of the case management approach.

Implications for case management practice: From the physicians' point of view, at least two changes are necessary for the project approach to be integrated into standard care. First, the target group should be adapted according to the case management approach. Second, the delegation of tasks and responsibilities to case managers should be revised. The sectoral difference in the acceptance of case managers by physicians indicates that active cooperation and communication in everyday work has direct impact on the acceptance of a new occupational profession. Physician acceptance has a significant impact on the implementation of new treatment modalities and thus influences the overall quality of health care.

脑卒中护理中的病例管理方法:从医学专业角度对混合方法的接受度分析。
研究目的:就持续和协调的卫生保健而言,跨部门的保健结构至关重要。然而,德国卫生保健系统的特点是医疗服务和责任分散。这种分裂导致多个接口经常导致信息、效率和质量的损失。病例管理的概念有可能改善各部门和保健提供者之间的合作。因此,对卒中患者的病例管理干预进行了评估,通过对医生与卒中管理人员合作意愿的接受度分析,以及他们对卒中患者医疗保健的病例管理潜力的评估。初级实践设置:初级实践设置包括在医院、康复和门诊部门工作的医生,他们在东威斯特伐利亚-利普项目区域内与中风病例管理人员有实际或潜在的接触。方法和样本:采用混合方法进行分析。专家访谈于2020年进行。随后制定了一份调查问卷,然后在2021年分发给医生。访谈和问卷都包括项目前的概念性知识和具体期望、项目期间的经验、建议和医生对未来卫生保健组织的评估等问题,以分类和描述接受情况。结果:共进行9次访谈,完成问卷23份。只有略多于50%的医生事先了解病例管理方法。总的来说,模棱两可的结果有关接受的情况下,管理人员透露。向中风患者提供额外的个人援助被认为是有益的,同时收集了关于医疗保健进一步分散以及与现有专业团体或医疗保健形式重叠的能力的关键观点。全科医生尤其对病例管理方法持批评态度。对病例管理实践的启示:从医生的角度来看,至少有两个变化是必要的项目方法整合到标准护理。首先,目标群体应根据个案管理方法进行调整。第二,对案例管理者的任务和责任分配进行修改。医生对病例管理人员接受度的行业差异表明,日常工作中的积极合作和沟通对新职业的接受度有直接影响。医生的接受程度对新治疗方式的实施有重大影响,从而影响医疗保健的整体质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Professional Case Management
Professional Case Management HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
26.70%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Professional Case Management: The Leader in Evidence-Based Practice is a peer-reviewed, contemporary journal that crosses all case management settings. The Journal features best practices and industry benchmarks for the professional case manager and also features hands-on information for case managers new to the specialty. Articles focus on the coordination of services, management of payer issues, population- and disease-specific aspects of patient care, efficient use of resources, improving the quality of care/patient safety, data and outcomes analysis, and patient advocacy. The Journal provides practical, hands-on information for day-to-day activities, as well as cutting-edge research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信