Distributed leadership in health quality improvement collaboratives.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Health Care Management Review Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-19 DOI:10.1097/HMR.0000000000000385
Kathrine Carstensen, Anne Mette Kjeldsen, Camilla Palmhøj Nielsen
{"title":"Distributed leadership in health quality improvement collaboratives.","authors":"Kathrine Carstensen, Anne Mette Kjeldsen, Camilla Palmhøj Nielsen","doi":"10.1097/HMR.0000000000000385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Distributed leadership has been suggested for describing patterns of influence in collaborative settings where public services are performed across professions and organizations. This study explores how leadership in health quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) is characterized by aligned distributed leadership practices, and how these practices relate with experienced progress and achievements in the quality improvement (QI) work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The analysis relied on a qualitative, multicase study of two nationwide Danish QICs. Data consisted of 12 single-person and 21 group interviews with local QI teams and local and regional QIC coordinators (85 informants in total), participant observations of 34 meetings within the QICs, and a collection of documentary material. The collected data were analyzed thematically with NVivo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Leadership practices in local QI teams are characterized by aligned distributed leadership, with leadership activities being widely distributed based on negotiated, emergent practices regarding the aims, roles, and scope of the QI work. However, local quality coordinators play a pivotal role in driving the QI activities, and hierarchical support from hospital/municipal management is a precondition for the contribution of aligned distributed leadership to experienced progress and QIs.</p><p><strong>Practice implications: </strong>Emergent distributed leadership should be balanced by thorough consolidation of the practices to provide the best circumstances for robust QI. The active participation of formal managers and local coordinators plays a pivotal role in this consolidation and is decisive for the increased potential for long-term success and sustainability of the QI work, particularly within complex QICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47778,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Management Review","volume":"49 1","pages":"46-58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000385","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Distributed leadership has been suggested for describing patterns of influence in collaborative settings where public services are performed across professions and organizations. This study explores how leadership in health quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) is characterized by aligned distributed leadership practices, and how these practices relate with experienced progress and achievements in the quality improvement (QI) work.

Methods: The analysis relied on a qualitative, multicase study of two nationwide Danish QICs. Data consisted of 12 single-person and 21 group interviews with local QI teams and local and regional QIC coordinators (85 informants in total), participant observations of 34 meetings within the QICs, and a collection of documentary material. The collected data were analyzed thematically with NVivo.

Results: Leadership practices in local QI teams are characterized by aligned distributed leadership, with leadership activities being widely distributed based on negotiated, emergent practices regarding the aims, roles, and scope of the QI work. However, local quality coordinators play a pivotal role in driving the QI activities, and hierarchical support from hospital/municipal management is a precondition for the contribution of aligned distributed leadership to experienced progress and QIs.

Practice implications: Emergent distributed leadership should be balanced by thorough consolidation of the practices to provide the best circumstances for robust QI. The active participation of formal managers and local coordinators plays a pivotal role in this consolidation and is decisive for the increased potential for long-term success and sustainability of the QI work, particularly within complex QICs.

在卫生质量改进协作中分配领导。
背景和目的:建议将分布式领导用于描述跨专业和跨组织提供公共服务的协作环境中的影响模式。本研究探讨了卫生质量改进协作(QICs)中的领导如何以一致的分布式领导实践为特征,以及这些实践如何与质量改进(QI)工作中的经验进展和成就相关联。方法:对丹麦两个全国性QICs进行多病例定性研究。数据包括对当地QI团队和当地和区域QIC协调员(共85名举报人)进行的12次单人访谈和21次小组访谈,对QIC内34次会议的参与者观察,以及收集的文献资料。使用NVivo对收集的数据进行主题分析。结果:本地QI团队中的领导实践以一致的分布式领导为特征,领导活动广泛分布在关于QI工作的目标、角色和范围的协商、紧急实践的基础上。然而,地方质量协调员在推动质量保证活动方面发挥着关键作用,医院/市政管理部门的分层支持是协调一致的分布式领导对经验进步和质量保证做出贡献的先决条件。实践含义:应该通过彻底整合实践来平衡紧急分布式领导,从而为健壮的QI提供最佳环境。正式管理人员和当地协调员的积极参与在这一整合过程中发挥着关键作用,对于提高质量保证体系工作的长期成功和可持续性的潜力具有决定性作用,特别是在复杂的质量保证体系中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Care Management Review
Health Care Management Review HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Health Care Management Review (HCMR) disseminates state-of-the-art knowledge about management, leadership, and administration of health care systems, organizations, and agencies. Multidisciplinary and international in scope, articles present completed research relevant to health care management, leadership, and administration, as well report on rigorous evaluations of health care management innovations, or provide a synthesis of prior research that results in evidence-based health care management practice recommendations. Articles are theory-driven and translate findings into implications and recommendations for health care administrators, researchers, and faculty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信