Development and demonstration of the protective efficacy of a convertible respiratory barrier enclosure: a simulation study.

IF 1.9 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-29 DOI:10.15441/ceem.23.067
Min Ho Park, Ki Sub Sung, Ji Hoon Kim, Jinwoo Myung, Ju Young Hong
{"title":"Development and demonstration of the protective efficacy of a convertible respiratory barrier enclosure: a simulation study.","authors":"Min Ho Park, Ki Sub Sung, Ji Hoon Kim, Jinwoo Myung, Ju Young Hong","doi":"10.15441/ceem.23.067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The efficacy of previously developed respiratory barrier enclosures to limit healthcare workers' exposure to aerosols from COVID-19 patients remains unclear; in addition, the design of these devices is unsuitable for transportation or other emergency procedures. Therefore, we developed a novel negative pressure respiratory isolator to improve protection from patient-generated aerosols and evaluated its protective effect in conversion to systemic isolator.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This in vitro study simulated droplets by nebulizing 1% glycerol + 99% ethanol solution. We performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and converted a respiratory barrier enclosure into a systemic isolator with a respiratory barrier as well as a respiratory barrier with negative pressure generator (NPG), which were compared with control and room air. During the procedure, particles were counted for 30 seconds and the count was repeated 10 times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During CPR, the total number of particles in the respiratory barrier with NPG (280,529; interquartile range [IQR], 205,263-359,195; P=0.970) was similar to that in the control (308,789; IQR, 175,056-473,276). Using NPG with a respiratory barrier reduced the number of particles to 27,524 (IQR, 26,703- 28,905; P=0.001). Particle number during conversion of the respiratory barrier into a systemic isolator was also lower than in the control (25,845; IQR, 19,391- 29,772; P=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The novel isolator was converted to a systemic isolator without air leakage. The aerosol-blocking effect of the isolator was quantified using a particle counter during CPR. Further studies comparing the barrier effect of isolators within various pressure differentials are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"59-67"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11009702/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.23.067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The efficacy of previously developed respiratory barrier enclosures to limit healthcare workers' exposure to aerosols from COVID-19 patients remains unclear; in addition, the design of these devices is unsuitable for transportation or other emergency procedures. Therefore, we developed a novel negative pressure respiratory isolator to improve protection from patient-generated aerosols and evaluated its protective effect in conversion to systemic isolator.

Methods: This in vitro study simulated droplets by nebulizing 1% glycerol + 99% ethanol solution. We performed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and converted a respiratory barrier enclosure into a systemic isolator with a respiratory barrier as well as a respiratory barrier with negative pressure generator (NPG), which were compared with control and room air. During the procedure, particles were counted for 30 seconds and the count was repeated 10 times.

Results: During CPR, the total number of particles in the respiratory barrier with NPG (280,529; interquartile range [IQR], 205,263-359,195; P=0.970) was similar to that in the control (308,789; IQR, 175,056-473,276). Using NPG with a respiratory barrier reduced the number of particles to 27,524 (IQR, 26,703- 28,905; P=0.001). Particle number during conversion of the respiratory barrier into a systemic isolator was also lower than in the control (25,845; IQR, 19,391- 29,772; P=0.001).

Conclusion: The novel isolator was converted to a systemic isolator without air leakage. The aerosol-blocking effect of the isolator was quantified using a particle counter during CPR. Further studies comparing the barrier effect of isolators within various pressure differentials are warranted.

一种可转换呼吸屏障罩的开发和防护效果的论证:模拟研究。
目的:目前尚不清楚先前开发的呼吸屏障对限制医护人员接触COVID-19患者气溶胶的效果;此外,这些装置的设计不适合运输或其他紧急程序。因此,我们开发了一种新型负压呼吸隔离器,以提高对患者产生的气溶胶的保护,并评估了其转化为全身隔离器的保护效果。方法:采用1%甘油+ 99%乙醇溶液雾化的方法进行体外模拟液滴实验。我们进行了心肺复苏(CPR),并将呼吸屏障围栏转换为带呼吸屏障的系统隔离器和带负压发生器的呼吸屏障(NPG),并与对照组和室内空气进行了比较。在此过程中,粒子计数30秒,计数重复10次。结果:心肺复苏术时,呼吸屏障内NPG颗粒总数(280,529;四分位间距[IQR], 205,263-359,195;P=0.9702)与对照组(308,789;差,175056 - 473276)。使用带有呼吸屏障的NPG可将颗粒数减少到27,524 (IQR, 26,703-28,905;P = 0.0014)。在将呼吸屏障转化为系统隔离器的过程中,颗粒数也低于对照组(25,845;差,19391 - 29772;P = 0.0014)。结论:将新型隔离器改造为无漏气的系统隔离器。在CPR过程中使用粒子计数器定量隔离器的气溶胶阻断效应。进一步的研究比较不同压差下隔离器的屏障效应是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信