Jadon H. Beck BA , Evan P. Sandefur BS , Maxwell O. Vest MD , Andrea A. Yu-Shan BS , Nicholas Peterman BS , Peter J. Apel MD, PhD
{"title":"Changes in Management at the Postoperative Visit After In-Office Wide Awake Local Anesthetic No Tourniquet Carpal Tunnel Release","authors":"Jadon H. Beck BA , Evan P. Sandefur BS , Maxwell O. Vest MD , Andrea A. Yu-Shan BS , Nicholas Peterman BS , Peter J. Apel MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Patients are commonly seen for two postoperative visits following carpal tunnel release (CTR), the first visit being at 1–2 weeks and the second at approximately 6 weeks. Our study aimed to determine if these visits led to changes in postoperative medical management.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review was conducted of 748 procedures performed in an in-office procedure room under wide awake local anesthetic no tourniquet between August 2020 and December 2022. Charts were reviewed for changes in management related to the patient’s CTR. Management changes involving a separate diagnosis or solely an additional follow-up visit were classified as unrelated to postoperative CTR care.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>A total of 730 patients returned for follow-up. There were 100 patients (13.7 %) who had a CTR-related change in management at the first postoperative visit. Most management changes at this timepoint were due to superficial surgical site infection. There were 29 patients (4.0 %) who had a CTR-related change in management at their second postoperative visit, most commonly a referral to therapy for stiffness or </span>hypersensitivity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While postoperative visits for CTR may have intangible benefits, changes in CTR-related care occur only in 17.7% of patients.</div></div><div><h3>Type of study/level of evidence</h3><div>Therapeutic IV.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":"50 4","pages":"Pages 503.e1-503.e6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363502323005506","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Patients are commonly seen for two postoperative visits following carpal tunnel release (CTR), the first visit being at 1–2 weeks and the second at approximately 6 weeks. Our study aimed to determine if these visits led to changes in postoperative medical management.
Methods
A retrospective review was conducted of 748 procedures performed in an in-office procedure room under wide awake local anesthetic no tourniquet between August 2020 and December 2022. Charts were reviewed for changes in management related to the patient’s CTR. Management changes involving a separate diagnosis or solely an additional follow-up visit were classified as unrelated to postoperative CTR care.
Results
A total of 730 patients returned for follow-up. There were 100 patients (13.7 %) who had a CTR-related change in management at the first postoperative visit. Most management changes at this timepoint were due to superficial surgical site infection. There were 29 patients (4.0 %) who had a CTR-related change in management at their second postoperative visit, most commonly a referral to therapy for stiffness or hypersensitivity.
Conclusions
While postoperative visits for CTR may have intangible benefits, changes in CTR-related care occur only in 17.7% of patients.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.