Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction A retrospective review of a high-volume Canadian center.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Michael Ordon, Aren Mnatzakanian, Melody Djuimo, R John D'A Honey, Jason Y Lee
{"title":"Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction A retrospective review of a high-volume Canadian center.","authors":"Michael Ordon, Aren Mnatzakanian, Melody Djuimo, R John D'A Honey, Jason Y Lee","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>At present, there is no literature on the outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALPyelo) in a Canadian context. Our objective was to perform a retrospective review of RALPyelo cases at a high-volume Canadian center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent RALPyelo at St. Michael's Hospital, between January 2012 and May 2019. Demographics, operative details, and pre- and postoperative imaging results (ultrasounds, computed tomography [CT] scans, and diuretic renal scan [DRS ]) were recorded. Patients were excluded if at least one-year followup data was unavailable. Our primary outcome was clinical and radiologic improvement defined as 1) symptom improvement; 2) stable/improved split renal function on DRS ; and 3) either improvement in the degree of hydronephrosis on ultrasound or CT, or improved drainage time on DRS. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, need for diagnostic intervention, and reintervention for recurrent UPJO.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 156 patients underwent RALPyelo after exclusions. The median age was 42 and 66% were female. Mean followup was 2.5 years. For our primary outcome, 87% had clinical and radiologic improvement. Diagnostic investigation for possible recurrent/persistent obstruction, based on symptoms and/or imaging results, was required in 17% of cases, but only 3% required reintervention for recurrent UPJO. Accordingly, the overall treatment success was 97%. The most common postoperative complication was urinary tract infection (18%), and urine leak was seen in only 2% of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of our study compare favorably with currently reported outcomes in the literature and demonstrate the safety and high level of success of RALPyelo at a high-volume Canadian center.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10954277/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8507","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: At present, there is no literature on the outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALPyelo) in a Canadian context. Our objective was to perform a retrospective review of RALPyelo cases at a high-volume Canadian center.

Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent RALPyelo at St. Michael's Hospital, between January 2012 and May 2019. Demographics, operative details, and pre- and postoperative imaging results (ultrasounds, computed tomography [CT] scans, and diuretic renal scan [DRS ]) were recorded. Patients were excluded if at least one-year followup data was unavailable. Our primary outcome was clinical and radiologic improvement defined as 1) symptom improvement; 2) stable/improved split renal function on DRS ; and 3) either improvement in the degree of hydronephrosis on ultrasound or CT, or improved drainage time on DRS. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, need for diagnostic intervention, and reintervention for recurrent UPJO.

Results: A total of 156 patients underwent RALPyelo after exclusions. The median age was 42 and 66% were female. Mean followup was 2.5 years. For our primary outcome, 87% had clinical and radiologic improvement. Diagnostic investigation for possible recurrent/persistent obstruction, based on symptoms and/or imaging results, was required in 17% of cases, but only 3% required reintervention for recurrent UPJO. Accordingly, the overall treatment success was 97%. The most common postoperative complication was urinary tract infection (18%), and urine leak was seen in only 2% of patients.

Conclusions: The results of our study compare favorably with currently reported outcomes in the literature and demonstrate the safety and high level of success of RALPyelo at a high-volume Canadian center.

机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂输尿管连接处梗阻的肾盂成形术:对加拿大一个大容量中心的回顾性回顾。
目前,在加拿大没有关于机器人辅助腹腔镜肾盂成形术(RALPyelo)的结果的文献。我们的目的是对加拿大一个高容量中心的RALPyelo病例进行回顾性审查。方法:我们对2012年1月至2019年5月期间在圣迈克尔医院接受RALPyelo治疗的患者进行了回顾性分析。记录人口统计学、手术细节、术前和术后影像学结果(超声、计算机断层扫描(CT)和利尿肾扫描(DRS))。如果无法获得至少一年的随访数据,则排除患者。我们的主要结局是临床和放射学改善,定义为1)症状改善;2) DRS组分裂肾功能稳定/改善;3)改善超声或CT上的肾积水程度,或改善DRS上的引流时间。次要结局包括术后并发症、诊断干预的需要以及复发性UPJO的再干预。结果:156例患者在排除后接受了RALPyelo。中位年龄为42岁,66%为女性。平均随访2.5年。对于我们的主要结果,87%的患者有临床和放射学改善。17%的病例需要根据症状和/或影像学结果对可能的复发性/持续性梗阻进行诊断调查,但只有3%的病例需要对复发性UPJO进行再干预。因此,总体治疗成功率为97%。最常见的术后并发症是尿路感染(18%),只有2%的患者出现尿漏。结论:我们的研究结果与目前文献报道的结果比较有利,并证明RALPyelo在加拿大一个大容量中心的安全性和高水平的成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
167
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信