A career exploration didactic and simulation-based session increases student knowledge in and exposure to urology.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
S Mohammad Mohaghegh, Colin Kleinguetl, Tyler Sheetz, John Patrick Mershon, Matthew Murtha, Steven Goldenthal, Eric Riedinger, Cheryl T Lee, Courtenay K Moore, Aliza Khuhro, Hafsa Asif, Chase Arnold, Tasha Posid
{"title":"A career exploration didactic and simulation-based session increases student knowledge in and exposure to urology.","authors":"S Mohammad Mohaghegh, Colin Kleinguetl, Tyler Sheetz, John Patrick Mershon, Matthew Murtha, Steven Goldenthal, Eric Riedinger, Cheryl T Lee, Courtenay K Moore, Aliza Khuhro, Hafsa Asif, Chase Arnold, Tasha Posid","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Though urology attracts well-qualified applicants, students are not typically provided exposure to this smaller specialty until later in their medical education. While simulation-based training continues to supplement medical education, there is a lack of programming to teach specialty-specific procedural skills to medical students and those outside the specialty. We report a half-day simulation and didactic-based approach to increase exposure to urology to interested second-year medical students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A half-day didactic- and simulation-based session was offered to second-year medical students (N=57). After a didactic-based overview of the specialty performed by urology providers and a surgical educator, the students participated in small-group simulations, including hands-on simulations. The students completed a post-curriculum survey measuring knowledge gains and soliciting feedback on the session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students were 57.1% Caucasian, 66.7% female, with a mean age of 24.2 years; 80% stated they were potentially interested in pursuing a surgical specialty such as urology prior to the start of the session. Students reported pre- to post-curriculum gains in knowledge (mean=37%) about a career in urology and basic urologic procedures (p<0.001). Participants were also likely to recommend the curriculum to their peers (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given that exposure to urology in medical school is usually limited and offered later in training, a half-day didactic- and simulation-based experience for second-year students provides an early introduction and experience within the specialty and its common bedside procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":"E105-E112"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11034959/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8518","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Though urology attracts well-qualified applicants, students are not typically provided exposure to this smaller specialty until later in their medical education. While simulation-based training continues to supplement medical education, there is a lack of programming to teach specialty-specific procedural skills to medical students and those outside the specialty. We report a half-day simulation and didactic-based approach to increase exposure to urology to interested second-year medical students.

Methods: A half-day didactic- and simulation-based session was offered to second-year medical students (N=57). After a didactic-based overview of the specialty performed by urology providers and a surgical educator, the students participated in small-group simulations, including hands-on simulations. The students completed a post-curriculum survey measuring knowledge gains and soliciting feedback on the session.

Results: Students were 57.1% Caucasian, 66.7% female, with a mean age of 24.2 years; 80% stated they were potentially interested in pursuing a surgical specialty such as urology prior to the start of the session. Students reported pre- to post-curriculum gains in knowledge (mean=37%) about a career in urology and basic urologic procedures (p<0.001). Participants were also likely to recommend the curriculum to their peers (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Given that exposure to urology in medical school is usually limited and offered later in training, a half-day didactic- and simulation-based experience for second-year students provides an early introduction and experience within the specialty and its common bedside procedures.

“职业探索”教学和模拟为基础的课程增加了学生对泌尿外科的知识和接触。
导读:尽管泌尿外科吸引了很多合格的申请者,但直到医学教育的后期,学生们通常才会接触到这一较小的专业。虽然以模拟为基础的培训继续补充医学教育,但缺乏向医学生和专业以外的人教授专业特定程序技能的编程。我们报告了半天的模拟和教学为基础的方法,以增加接触泌尿外科感兴趣的二年级医学生。方法:对57名二年级医学生进行为期半天的教学和模拟教学。在由泌尿外科医生和外科教育者进行的以教学为基础的专业概述之后,学生们参加了小组模拟,包括动手模拟。学生们完成了一项课后调查,衡量他们的知识收获,并征求对课程的反馈。结果:白种人占57.1%,女性占66.7%,平均年龄24.2岁;在课程开始之前,80%的学生表示他们可能对攻读泌尿外科等外科专业感兴趣。学生报告了课前和课后对泌尿外科和基础泌尿外科手术的知识收获(平均=37%)。结论:考虑到泌尿外科在医学院的接触通常是有限的,并且在培训之后才提供,为二年级学生提供半天的教学和模拟经验,可以早期介绍和体验该专业及其常见的床边手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
167
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信