Policy education in a research-focused doctoral nursing program: Power as knowing participation in change.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Nursing Inquiry Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-27 DOI:10.1111/nin.12615
Donna J Perry, Saisha Cintron, Pamela J Grace, Dorothy A Jones, Anne T Kane, Heather M Kennedy, Violet M Malinski, William Mar, Lauri Toohey
{"title":"Policy education in a research-focused doctoral nursing program: Power as knowing participation in change.","authors":"Donna J Perry, Saisha Cintron, Pamela J Grace, Dorothy A Jones, Anne T Kane, Heather M Kennedy, Violet M Malinski, William Mar, Lauri Toohey","doi":"10.1111/nin.12615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nurses have moral obligations incurred by membership in the profession to participate knowingly in health policy advocacy. Many barriers have historically hindered nurses from realizing their potential to advance health policy. The contemporary political context sets additional challenges to policy work due to polarization and conflict. Nursing education can help nurses recognize their role in advancing health through political advocacy in a manner that is consistent with disciplinary knowledge and ethical responsibilities. In this paper, the authors describe an exemplar of Elizabeth Barrett's \"Power as Knowing Participation in Change\" theory as a disciplinary lens within a doctoral nursing health policy course. Barrett (radically) emphasizes \"power as freedom\" instead of \"power as control.\" This approach is congruent with nursing disciplinary values and enhances awareness of personal freedom and building collaborative relationships in the policy process. The theory was used in concert with other traditional policy content and frameworks from nursing and other disciplines. We discuss the role of nursing ethics viewed as professional responsibility for policy action, an overview of Barrett's theory, and the design of the course. Four student reflections on how the course influenced their thinking about policy advocacy are included. While not specific to policymaking, Barrett's theory provides a disciplinary grounding to increase students' awareness of freedom and choices in political advocacy participation. Our experience suggests that Barrett's work can be fruitful for enhancing nurses' awareness of choices to participate in change across settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49727,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Inquiry","volume":" ","pages":"e12615"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12615","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nurses have moral obligations incurred by membership in the profession to participate knowingly in health policy advocacy. Many barriers have historically hindered nurses from realizing their potential to advance health policy. The contemporary political context sets additional challenges to policy work due to polarization and conflict. Nursing education can help nurses recognize their role in advancing health through political advocacy in a manner that is consistent with disciplinary knowledge and ethical responsibilities. In this paper, the authors describe an exemplar of Elizabeth Barrett's "Power as Knowing Participation in Change" theory as a disciplinary lens within a doctoral nursing health policy course. Barrett (radically) emphasizes "power as freedom" instead of "power as control." This approach is congruent with nursing disciplinary values and enhances awareness of personal freedom and building collaborative relationships in the policy process. The theory was used in concert with other traditional policy content and frameworks from nursing and other disciplines. We discuss the role of nursing ethics viewed as professional responsibility for policy action, an overview of Barrett's theory, and the design of the course. Four student reflections on how the course influenced their thinking about policy advocacy are included. While not specific to policymaking, Barrett's theory provides a disciplinary grounding to increase students' awareness of freedom and choices in political advocacy participation. Our experience suggests that Barrett's work can be fruitful for enhancing nurses' awareness of choices to participate in change across settings.

以研究为重点的护理博士项目中的政策教育:参与变革的力量。
作为职业成员,护士有道德义务在知情的情况下参与卫生政策宣传。历史上,许多障碍阻碍了护士发挥其推动卫生政策的潜力。由于两极分化和冲突,当代政治背景给政策工作带来了额外的挑战。护理教育可以帮助护士认识到他们在促进健康方面的作用,通过与学科知识和道德责任相一致的方式进行政治宣传。在本文中,作者描述了伊丽莎白·巴雷特(Elizabeth Barrett)的“权力即参与变革”理论的一个范例,作为博士护理健康政策课程的学科镜头。巴雷特(激进地)强调“权力即自由”,而不是“权力即控制”。这种方法符合护理学科的价值观,提高了个人自由的意识,并在政策过程中建立了合作关系。该理论与护理和其他学科的其他传统政策内容和框架一起使用。我们将讨论护理伦理作为政策行动的专业责任的作用,概述巴雷特的理论,以及课程的设计。其中包括四名学生对课程如何影响他们对政策倡导的思考的反思。虽然巴雷特的理论并不专门针对政策制定,但它为提高学生在政治倡导参与中的自由和选择意识提供了学科基础。我们的经验表明,巴雷特的工作可以卓有成效地提高护士的选择意识,参与跨环境的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Inquiry
Nursing Inquiry 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Inquiry aims to stimulate examination of nursing''s current and emerging practices, conditions and contexts within an expanding international community of ideas. The journal aspires to excite thinking and stimulate action toward a preferred future for health and healthcare by encouraging critical reflection and lively debate on matters affecting and influenced by nursing from a range of disciplinary angles, scientific perspectives, analytic approaches, social locations and philosophical positions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信