Implicit factors influencing the HTA deliberative processes in 5 European countries: results from a mixed-methods research

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Clara Monleón , Hans Martin-Späth , Carlos Crespo , Claude Dussart , Mondher Toumi
{"title":"Implicit factors influencing the HTA deliberative processes in 5 European countries: results from a mixed-methods research","authors":"Clara Monleón ,&nbsp;Hans Martin-Späth ,&nbsp;Carlos Crespo ,&nbsp;Claude Dussart ,&nbsp;Mondher Toumi","doi":"10.1016/j.hpopen.2023.100109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Health technology assessment (HTA) bodies across Europe rely on explicit factors for decision making. However, additional undefined factors play a role. This mixed-methods research aimed to identify the implicit factors involved in HTA deliberative processes in five European countries, and to analyze their impact on decision making.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Between February and May 2021, semi-structured interviews (n = 20) were conducted with HTA experts of three different profiles (chair, advisor, and committee member) from France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom. The degree of influence of a set of implicit factors and attributes that play a role in the HTA deliberative process, as previously identified in a systematic literature review, was scored by the experts. Experts were also asked to make recommendations on ways of improving the deliberative process. A qualitative analysis and descriptive statistics of quantitative variables are reported.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Most (18/20) experts concurred that implicit factors play a role in the HTA deliberative process. Recommendations for improving the process fell into three categories: transparency, methodology improvement, and stakeholder involvement. The results suggest a need for 1) increased external involvement HTA and 2) development of a methodology to mitigate the influence of implicit factors in the deliberative process. This could be achieved by updating the current frameworks to acknowledge these implicit factors and by developing methods to address them.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34527,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy Open","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100109"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590229623000217/pdfft?md5=a0ed6fed397a38fca8df16fef25de9ed&pid=1-s2.0-S2590229623000217-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590229623000217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Health technology assessment (HTA) bodies across Europe rely on explicit factors for decision making. However, additional undefined factors play a role. This mixed-methods research aimed to identify the implicit factors involved in HTA deliberative processes in five European countries, and to analyze their impact on decision making.

Methods

Between February and May 2021, semi-structured interviews (n = 20) were conducted with HTA experts of three different profiles (chair, advisor, and committee member) from France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom. The degree of influence of a set of implicit factors and attributes that play a role in the HTA deliberative process, as previously identified in a systematic literature review, was scored by the experts. Experts were also asked to make recommendations on ways of improving the deliberative process. A qualitative analysis and descriptive statistics of quantitative variables are reported.

Results

Most (18/20) experts concurred that implicit factors play a role in the HTA deliberative process. Recommendations for improving the process fell into three categories: transparency, methodology improvement, and stakeholder involvement. The results suggest a need for 1) increased external involvement HTA and 2) development of a methodology to mitigate the influence of implicit factors in the deliberative process. This could be achieved by updating the current frameworks to acknowledge these implicit factors and by developing methods to address them.

影响5个欧洲国家HTA审议过程的隐性因素:一项混合方法研究的结果
欧洲各地的卫生技术评估(HTA)机构依靠明确的因素进行决策。然而,其他未定义的因素也起着作用。本研究旨在找出五个欧洲国家HTA审议过程中涉及的隐含因素,并分析其对决策的影响。方法在2021年2月至5月期间,对来自法国、德国、意大利、西班牙和英国的三种不同类型的HTA专家(主席、顾问和委员会成员)进行了半结构化访谈(n = 20)。在HTA审议过程中发挥作用的一组隐含因素和属性的影响程度,如先前在系统文献综述中确定的那样,由专家评分。还请专家们就如何改进审议过程提出建议。报告了定量变量的定性分析和描述性统计。结果大多数(18/20)专家认为隐含因素在HTA审议过程中发挥了作用。改进过程的建议分为三类:透明度、方法改进和涉众参与。结果表明,需要1)增加外部参与HTA和2)开发一种方法来减轻审议过程中隐含因素的影响。要做到这一点,可以更新目前的框架,承认这些隐含的因素,并制定解决这些因素的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Policy Open
Health Policy Open Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信