Chao Qi , Xiankun Wang , Dianpeng Su , Yadong Guo , Fanlin Yang
{"title":"Comparison and analysis of ground seed detectors and interpolation methods in airborne LiDAR filtering","authors":"Chao Qi , Xiankun Wang , Dianpeng Su , Yadong Guo , Fanlin Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrs.2023.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ground seed detectors and interpolation methods are fundamental components of filtering algorithms. However, the performance of different detectors and interpolation methods typically varies, and few studies have been conducted on the adaptability of different detectors and interpolation methods to different terrains. Therefore, we compare three ground seed detectors (cylindrical neighborhood (CN), fixed grid (FG), and moving window (MW)) and three interpolation methods (triangulated irregular network (TIN), thin plate spline (TPS), and inverse distance weighting (IDW)). In addition, nine filters are constructed by combining the three ground seed detectors and the three interpolation methods to evaluate their comprehensive influences. To assess the performance of these detectors, interpolation methods, and filters, fifteen ISPRS-supplied light detection and ranging (LiDAR) benchmark datasets are utilized in the experiment. The findings indicate that the CN-TPS filter, which combines the CN detector and TPS method, achieves superior performance across mean <em>P<sub>g</sub></em> (99.16 % – correctly classified ground points divided by all extracted ground points), RMSE (0.44 m – root mean squared error), and total error (3.78 %). Moreover, the filtering methods are mainly affected by the performance of the ground seed detector and are less affected by the selected interpolation method. These results can be used to provide a valuable reference for designing an optimal LiDAR filtering algorithm for varied terrain types and applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48539,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences","volume":"26 4","pages":"Pages 1009-1019"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110982323000868/pdfft?md5=6a08d79ce8909dd9c9d99181122fba69&pid=1-s2.0-S1110982323000868-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110982323000868","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ground seed detectors and interpolation methods are fundamental components of filtering algorithms. However, the performance of different detectors and interpolation methods typically varies, and few studies have been conducted on the adaptability of different detectors and interpolation methods to different terrains. Therefore, we compare three ground seed detectors (cylindrical neighborhood (CN), fixed grid (FG), and moving window (MW)) and three interpolation methods (triangulated irregular network (TIN), thin plate spline (TPS), and inverse distance weighting (IDW)). In addition, nine filters are constructed by combining the three ground seed detectors and the three interpolation methods to evaluate their comprehensive influences. To assess the performance of these detectors, interpolation methods, and filters, fifteen ISPRS-supplied light detection and ranging (LiDAR) benchmark datasets are utilized in the experiment. The findings indicate that the CN-TPS filter, which combines the CN detector and TPS method, achieves superior performance across mean Pg (99.16 % – correctly classified ground points divided by all extracted ground points), RMSE (0.44 m – root mean squared error), and total error (3.78 %). Moreover, the filtering methods are mainly affected by the performance of the ground seed detector and are less affected by the selected interpolation method. These results can be used to provide a valuable reference for designing an optimal LiDAR filtering algorithm for varied terrain types and applications.
地面种子检测器和插值方法是滤波算法的基本组成部分。然而,不同探测器和插值方法的性能差异较大,不同探测器和插值方法对不同地形的适应性研究较少。因此,我们比较了三种地面种子探测器(圆柱邻域(CN)、固定网格(FG)和移动窗口(MW))和三种插值方法(不规则三角网(TIN)、薄板样条(TPS)和反向距离加权(IDW))。此外,结合三种地面种子探测器和三种插值方法构建了9个滤波器,以评估它们的综合影响。为了评估这些探测器、插值方法和滤波器的性能,实验中使用了15个isprs提供的光探测和测距(LiDAR)基准数据集。结果表明,结合CN检测器和TPS方法的CN-TPS滤波器在平均Pg(99.16% -正确分类的地面点除以所有提取的地面点)、RMSE (0.44 m -均方根误差)和总误差(3.78%)方面都取得了优异的性能。此外,滤波方法主要受地面种子探测器性能的影响,所选择的插值方法对滤波方法的影响较小。这些结果可为设计适合不同地形类型和应用的最佳激光雷达滤波算法提供有价值的参考。
期刊介绍:
The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences (EJRS) encompasses a comprehensive range of topics within Remote Sensing, Geographic Information Systems (GIS), planetary geology, and space technology development, including theories, applications, and modeling. EJRS aims to disseminate high-quality, peer-reviewed research focusing on the advancement of remote sensing and GIS technologies and their practical applications for effective planning, sustainable development, and environmental resource conservation. The journal particularly welcomes innovative papers with broad scientific appeal.