["Endo-prosthetic" preparation of curved roots].

Les Cahiers de prothese Pub Date : 1989-03-01
J Dejou, J Camps, B Levallois
{"title":"[\"Endo-prosthetic\" preparation of curved roots].","authors":"J Dejou,&nbsp;J Camps,&nbsp;B Levallois","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the tooth preparation for root posts, all must be attempted to avoid weakening of the root. This \"must\" is rather easy for straight roots, but the same is not true of curved roots. The authors have used the method described by BRAMANTE et al. to study the effects of various techniques of instrumental sequences of endodontic preparation, and of two instrumental sequences of root post preparation. From this studies, it results that: --the respect of the canal path during the endodontic phase conditions the respect of the internal wall of the curvature, during drilling. --among the four endodontic techniques studied: MM 3000, Step-Back, Anti Curvature Filling and Canal Finder System, the last two seem to allow more respect of the canal path. --the instrumental sequence using Largo drills to prepare a canal, presents two types of drawbacks: * Excessive abrasion of the convex (internal) wall of the canal system. It seems that the blunt point rests against the concave portion of the canal and pushes the drill toward the internal wall, therefore weakening it. * Inadequate match between the size of the drill and that of the prepared canal. --the Parapost drills, on the contrary, respect the endodontic path, and may even be used beyond the curvature (2 mm). Besides, the diameter of the prepared canal is similar to that of the instrument used. These two factors permit to obtain a better retention of the post as well as a lesser weakening of the root.</p>","PeriodicalId":76114,"journal":{"name":"Les Cahiers de prothese","volume":" 65","pages":"6-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Les Cahiers de prothese","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the tooth preparation for root posts, all must be attempted to avoid weakening of the root. This "must" is rather easy for straight roots, but the same is not true of curved roots. The authors have used the method described by BRAMANTE et al. to study the effects of various techniques of instrumental sequences of endodontic preparation, and of two instrumental sequences of root post preparation. From this studies, it results that: --the respect of the canal path during the endodontic phase conditions the respect of the internal wall of the curvature, during drilling. --among the four endodontic techniques studied: MM 3000, Step-Back, Anti Curvature Filling and Canal Finder System, the last two seem to allow more respect of the canal path. --the instrumental sequence using Largo drills to prepare a canal, presents two types of drawbacks: * Excessive abrasion of the convex (internal) wall of the canal system. It seems that the blunt point rests against the concave portion of the canal and pushes the drill toward the internal wall, therefore weakening it. * Inadequate match between the size of the drill and that of the prepared canal. --the Parapost drills, on the contrary, respect the endodontic path, and may even be used beyond the curvature (2 mm). Besides, the diameter of the prepared canal is similar to that of the instrument used. These two factors permit to obtain a better retention of the post as well as a lesser weakening of the root.

[弯曲根的“内假体”制备]。
在预备牙根桩时,必须尽量避免使牙根变弱。这个“必须”对于直根来说是相当容易的,但是对于弯曲的根就不是这样了。作者使用BRAMANTE等人描述的方法研究了各种根管预备器械序列技术的效果,以及两种根后预备器械序列的效果。从这项研究中,它的结果是:—根管阶段的根管路径的尊重条件下的内壁曲率,在钻孔。在研究的四种根管技术中:MM 3000、退步、反弯曲填充和根管查找系统,后两种技术似乎更尊重根管路径。—使用Largo钻头准备根管的器械序列存在两种缺点:*对根管系统的凸(内)壁过度磨损。似乎钝的尖头抵住了牙根管的凹部,把钻推向了内壁,从而削弱了它。*钻的尺寸与准备好的牙管尺寸不匹配。相反,Parapost钻头尊重根管路径,甚至可以在曲率(2mm)之外使用。此外,预备管的直径与所用器械的直径相似。这两个因素可以使岗位得到更好的保留,并使根部较少受到削弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信