[Reinforcement of cores on porcelain jacket crowns. Influence of alumina powder properties on the cores].

Shika gakuho. Dental science reports Pub Date : 1989-04-01
H Yamamoto
{"title":"[Reinforcement of cores on porcelain jacket crowns. Influence of alumina powder properties on the cores].","authors":"H Yamamoto","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Various alumina particles were investigated for use as core reinforcement to strengthen aluminous-porcelain jacket crowns. The alumina particles were either spherical or nonspherical and were between 5.3 microns and 60 microns in size. Initially comparisons were made among such properties as particle-size distribution, apparent density, specific surface area, and flow. Then each alumina powder was mixed with feldspar at rates of from 10wt% to 70wt% at increments of 10wt%. Formed into columns, the powder was fired at 1350 degrees C for 5 minutes. The resulting feldspar-alumina composites were compared for shrinkage then cut and prepared into disc specimens. The disc-rupture test was employed to measure composite strengths. A scanning electron microscope was employed to observe alumina particles and composite cross sections. Results 1. Spherical alumina (average particle size 5.4 microns), spherical alumina (average particle size 28.9 microns), and nonspherical alumina (average particle size 58.0 microns) were higher in apparent density and flow rate but lower in specific surface area. 2. Feldspar-alumina composites shrank approximately 30%; shrinkage of 15-20% occurred only in composites involving spherical alumina (average particle size 5.4 microns). 3. Composites of feldspar and spherical alumina were observed to be stronger than those of feldspar and nonspherical alumina. Composites containing 50-60wt% (especially when the alumina particle size was 5.4 microns) were the sturdiest. 4. Increasing the amount of alumina proportionally increased composite strength. In composites containing nonspherical alumina, volume amount and strength were not always proportional. 5. Microscopic examination of composite cross sections showed uniform dispersion of spherical alumina but no dispersion of nonspherical alumina. In conclusion, spherical alumina (especially when average particle size is 5.4 microns) demonstrated the best powder properties as a reinforcing core material and therefore is most suitable for reinforcing the core of the porcelain jacket crown.</p>","PeriodicalId":76540,"journal":{"name":"Shika gakuho. Dental science reports","volume":"89 4","pages":"841-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shika gakuho. Dental science reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various alumina particles were investigated for use as core reinforcement to strengthen aluminous-porcelain jacket crowns. The alumina particles were either spherical or nonspherical and were between 5.3 microns and 60 microns in size. Initially comparisons were made among such properties as particle-size distribution, apparent density, specific surface area, and flow. Then each alumina powder was mixed with feldspar at rates of from 10wt% to 70wt% at increments of 10wt%. Formed into columns, the powder was fired at 1350 degrees C for 5 minutes. The resulting feldspar-alumina composites were compared for shrinkage then cut and prepared into disc specimens. The disc-rupture test was employed to measure composite strengths. A scanning electron microscope was employed to observe alumina particles and composite cross sections. Results 1. Spherical alumina (average particle size 5.4 microns), spherical alumina (average particle size 28.9 microns), and nonspherical alumina (average particle size 58.0 microns) were higher in apparent density and flow rate but lower in specific surface area. 2. Feldspar-alumina composites shrank approximately 30%; shrinkage of 15-20% occurred only in composites involving spherical alumina (average particle size 5.4 microns). 3. Composites of feldspar and spherical alumina were observed to be stronger than those of feldspar and nonspherical alumina. Composites containing 50-60wt% (especially when the alumina particle size was 5.4 microns) were the sturdiest. 4. Increasing the amount of alumina proportionally increased composite strength. In composites containing nonspherical alumina, volume amount and strength were not always proportional. 5. Microscopic examination of composite cross sections showed uniform dispersion of spherical alumina but no dispersion of nonspherical alumina. In conclusion, spherical alumina (especially when average particle size is 5.4 microns) demonstrated the best powder properties as a reinforcing core material and therefore is most suitable for reinforcing the core of the porcelain jacket crown.

[瓷套冠上芯的加固。氧化铝粉体性能对芯材的影响[j]。
研究了不同氧化铝颗粒作为铝瓷套冠的核心增强材料。氧化铝颗粒为球形或非球形,尺寸在5.3微米到60微米之间。首先比较了颗粒大小分布、表观密度、比表面积和流量等特性。然后将每种氧化铝粉末以10wt%至70wt%的速率以10wt%的增量与长石混合。粉末形成柱状,在1350摄氏度下烧制5分钟。所得的长石-氧化铝复合材料进行了收缩比较,然后切割并制备成圆盘试样。采用圆盘断裂试验测定复合材料的强度。用扫描电镜观察了氧化铝颗粒和复合材料的截面。结果1。球形氧化铝(平均粒径5.4微米)、球形氧化铝(平均粒径28.9微米)和非球形氧化铝(平均粒径58.0微米)的表观密度和流速较高,比表面积较低。2. 长石-氧化铝复合材料收缩约30%;收缩15-20%只发生在复合材料涉及球形氧化铝(平均粒径5.4微米)。3.长石与球形氧化铝的复合材料比长石与非球形氧化铝的复合材料强度大。复合材料含有50-60wt%(特别是当氧化铝粒度为5.4微米时)是最坚固的。4. 随着氧化铝用量的增加,复合材料强度呈比例增加。在含非球形氧化铝的复合材料中,体积量与强度并不总是成正比的。5. 复合材料截面的显微检查显示球形氧化铝分散均匀,而非球形氧化铝没有分散。综上所述,球形氧化铝(尤其是平均粒径为5.4微米时)粉体性能最好,最适合用于瓷套冠的补强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信