A method of aircraft seat dimension design for long-term use by passengers with different body types

IF 2.5 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Jin Wang , Jin-Yi Zhi , Xu-Wei Zhang , Feng Wei , Li-Li Zhang
{"title":"A method of aircraft seat dimension design for long-term use by passengers with different body types","authors":"Jin Wang ,&nbsp;Jin-Yi Zhi ,&nbsp;Xu-Wei Zhang ,&nbsp;Feng Wei ,&nbsp;Li-Li Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ergon.2023.103520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To improve the comfort of seat support performance, we proposed a seat dimensions design method. First, an adjustable seat was used to obtain the measurement data of user-selected comfortable seat dimensions. Second, the differences in the measurement data of different body types and riding time variables were analyzed. Third, a compromise treatment method for the different comfort requirements was developed. This method was applied to the design of passenger seats for short-distance flights in China. The lumbar support thickness was significantly different in the time variables, and the seat pan inclination and neck support height were significantly different among body types. We did not find significant differences, however, in seat height, backrest inclination, lumbar support height, or neck support thickness according to time or body type variables. There is one optimal dimension for seat height (430.5 mm), backrest inclination (104.2°), lumbar support height (98.8 mm), and neck support thickness (44.4 mm). However, seat pan inclination (5.8°, 7.2°, and 9.3°), neck support height (582.6 mm and 622.5 mm), and lumbar support thickness (40.6 mm and 48.7 mm) need multiple dimensions to meet passenger comfort requirements. This seat dimension design method provides new ideas to explore the comfort requirements of passengers and addresses the differences in comfortable seat dimension requirements for different body types and different flight durations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50317,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 103520"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169814123001129","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To improve the comfort of seat support performance, we proposed a seat dimensions design method. First, an adjustable seat was used to obtain the measurement data of user-selected comfortable seat dimensions. Second, the differences in the measurement data of different body types and riding time variables were analyzed. Third, a compromise treatment method for the different comfort requirements was developed. This method was applied to the design of passenger seats for short-distance flights in China. The lumbar support thickness was significantly different in the time variables, and the seat pan inclination and neck support height were significantly different among body types. We did not find significant differences, however, in seat height, backrest inclination, lumbar support height, or neck support thickness according to time or body type variables. There is one optimal dimension for seat height (430.5 mm), backrest inclination (104.2°), lumbar support height (98.8 mm), and neck support thickness (44.4 mm). However, seat pan inclination (5.8°, 7.2°, and 9.3°), neck support height (582.6 mm and 622.5 mm), and lumbar support thickness (40.6 mm and 48.7 mm) need multiple dimensions to meet passenger comfort requirements. This seat dimension design method provides new ideas to explore the comfort requirements of passengers and addresses the differences in comfortable seat dimension requirements for different body types and different flight durations.

适合不同体型乘客长期使用的飞机座椅尺寸设计方法
为了提高座椅支撑性能的舒适性,提出了一种座椅尺寸设计方法。首先,利用可调节座椅获得用户选择舒适座椅尺寸的测量数据。其次,分析了不同体型和骑行时间变量测量数据的差异。第三,针对不同的舒适性要求,提出了一种折衷的处理方法。将该方法应用于国内短途航班乘客座椅的设计。腰椎支撑厚度在时间变量上存在显著差异,座椅倾斜和颈部支撑高度在体型上存在显著差异。然而,我们没有发现座椅高度、靠背倾斜度、腰部支撑高度或颈部支撑厚度在时间或体型变量上有显著差异。最佳尺寸为座椅高度(430.5 mm)、靠背倾角(104.2°)、腰部支撑高度(98.8 mm)和颈部支撑厚度(44.4 mm)。然而,座椅倾斜度(5.8°、7.2°和9.3°)、颈部支撑高度(582.6 mm和622.5 mm)和腰部支撑厚度(40.6 mm和48.7 mm)需要多维度来满足乘客舒适度要求。这种座椅尺寸设计方法为探索乘客的舒适性需求提供了新的思路,解决了不同机型和不同飞行时间对舒适座椅尺寸要求的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.90%
发文量
110
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions that add to our understanding of the role of humans in today systems and the interactions thereof with various system components. The journal typically covers the following areas: industrial and occupational ergonomics, design of systems, tools and equipment, human performance measurement and modeling, human productivity, humans in technologically complex systems, and safety. The focus of the articles includes basic theoretical advances, applications, case studies, new methodologies and procedures; and empirical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信