Impact of a Wellness Leadership Intervention on the Empathy, Burnout, and Resting Heart Rate of Medical Faculty

Debra A. Gilin PhD , Gregory G. Anderson MSc , Seyedehsan Etezad MSc , Dayna Lee-Baggley PhD , Angela M. Cooper PhD, RPsych , Roberta J. Preston EdD
{"title":"Impact of a Wellness Leadership Intervention on the Empathy, Burnout, and Resting Heart Rate of Medical Faculty","authors":"Debra A. Gilin PhD ,&nbsp;Gregory G. Anderson MSc ,&nbsp;Seyedehsan Etezad MSc ,&nbsp;Dayna Lee-Baggley PhD ,&nbsp;Angela M. Cooper PhD, RPsych ,&nbsp;Roberta J. Preston EdD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2023.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the efficacy of a wellness leadership intervention for improving the empathy, burnout, and physiological stress of medical faculty leaders.</p></div><div><h3>Participants and Methods</h3><p>Participants were 49 medical faculty leaders (80% physicians, 20% basic scientists; 67% female). The 6-week course was evaluated with a 15-week longitudinal waitlist-control quasi-experiment from September 1, 2021, through December 20, 2021 (during the COVID-19 pandemic). We analyzed 3 pretest-posttest-posttest and 6 weekly survey measurements of affective empathy and burnout, and mean=85 (SD=31) aggregated daily resting heart rates per participant, using 2-level hierarchical linear modeling.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The course found a preventive effect for leaders’ burnout escalation. As the control group awaited the course, their empathy decreased (coefficient<sub>Time</sub>=−1.27; <em>P</em>=.02) and their resting heart rates increased an average of 1.4 beats/min (coefficient<sub>Time</sub>=0.18; <em>P</em>&lt;.001), reflecting the toll of the pandemic. Intervention group leaders reported no empathy decrements (coefficient<sub>Time</sub>=.33; <em>P</em>=.59) or escalated resting heart rate (coefficient<sub>Time</sub>=−0.05; <em>P</em>=.27) during the same period. Dose-response analysis revealed that both groups reduced their self-rated burnout over the 6 weeks of the course (coefficient<sub>Time</sub>=−0.28; <em>P</em>=.007), and those who attended more of the course showed less heart rate increase (coefficient<sub>Time∗Dosage</sub>=−0.05; <em>P</em>&lt;.001). In addition, 12.73% of the within-person fluctuation in empathy was associated with burnout and resting heart rate.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A wellness leadership intervention helped prevent burnout escalation and empathy decrement in medical faculty leaders during the COVID-19 pandemic, showing potential to improve the supportiveness and psychological safety of the medical training environment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454823000632/pdfft?md5=06b08332fb7a367a7844d8925992f219&pid=1-s2.0-S2542454823000632-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454823000632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of a wellness leadership intervention for improving the empathy, burnout, and physiological stress of medical faculty leaders.

Participants and Methods

Participants were 49 medical faculty leaders (80% physicians, 20% basic scientists; 67% female). The 6-week course was evaluated with a 15-week longitudinal waitlist-control quasi-experiment from September 1, 2021, through December 20, 2021 (during the COVID-19 pandemic). We analyzed 3 pretest-posttest-posttest and 6 weekly survey measurements of affective empathy and burnout, and mean=85 (SD=31) aggregated daily resting heart rates per participant, using 2-level hierarchical linear modeling.

Results

The course found a preventive effect for leaders’ burnout escalation. As the control group awaited the course, their empathy decreased (coefficientTime=−1.27; P=.02) and their resting heart rates increased an average of 1.4 beats/min (coefficientTime=0.18; P<.001), reflecting the toll of the pandemic. Intervention group leaders reported no empathy decrements (coefficientTime=.33; P=.59) or escalated resting heart rate (coefficientTime=−0.05; P=.27) during the same period. Dose-response analysis revealed that both groups reduced their self-rated burnout over the 6 weeks of the course (coefficientTime=−0.28; P=.007), and those who attended more of the course showed less heart rate increase (coefficientTime∗Dosage=−0.05; P<.001). In addition, 12.73% of the within-person fluctuation in empathy was associated with burnout and resting heart rate.

Conclusion

A wellness leadership intervention helped prevent burnout escalation and empathy decrement in medical faculty leaders during the COVID-19 pandemic, showing potential to improve the supportiveness and psychological safety of the medical training environment.

健康领导干预对医务人员共情、倦怠和静息心率的影响
目的评价健康领导干预对改善医学院领导共情、倦怠和生理应激的效果。参与者和方法49名医学院领导(80%为内科医生,20%为基础科学家;67%的女性)。从2021年9月1日至2021年12月20日(COVID-19大流行期间),通过为期15周的纵向候补名单对照准实验对为期6周的课程进行评估。我们分析了3次前测-后测-后测和6次每周情感共情和倦怠的调查测量结果,并使用两级层次线性模型,得出每位参与者的平均每日静息心率=85 (SD=31)。结果该课程对领导倦怠升级具有预防作用。当对照组等待课程时,他们的同理心减少(系数时间= - 1.27;P= 0.02),静息心率平均增加1.4次/分(coefficientTime=0.18;P<.001),反映了大流行造成的损失。干预组组长未报告共情能力下降(coefficientTime=.33;P= 0.59)或静息心率升高(coefficientTime=−0.05;P=.27)。剂量反应分析显示,两组在6周的课程中都减少了他们的自评倦怠(系数时间= - 0.28;P=.007),而那些参加更多课程的人心率增加较少(系数时间*剂量= - 0.05;术;措施)。此外,12.73%的共情情绪波动与倦怠和静息心率相关。结论健康领导干预有助于预防新冠肺炎大流行期间医学教师领导的倦怠升级和共情下降,显示出改善医学培训环境的支持性和心理安全性的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信