[The ceramic-tooth margin in ceramometal prosthesis. A comparative study of three fabrication procedures].

Les Cahiers de prothese Pub Date : 1989-06-01
C Launois
{"title":"[The ceramic-tooth margin in ceramometal prosthesis. A comparative study of three fabrication procedures].","authors":"C Launois","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study of the ceramicbutt joint in metal-ceramic prosthesis permits to compare three different laboratory procedures. With the results obtained with two reading processes (numerical measurement and direct measurement of image replicas of S.E.M. to evaluate the marginal gap, it is possible to confirm that: the gold foil method gives the thinnest gap (between 32.7 and 44.7 micrometers) with presence of overcontoured margins. The ceramicbutt joint made by duplicate method, in refractory material, proves to be larger (between 57 and 67.8 micrometers) with overhanging margins, and damaged by sandblasting. The direct elaboration method, on a plaster model, proves to be less precise (gap between 74.6 and 80.4 micrometers) with a round but glossy ceramic margins.</p>","PeriodicalId":76114,"journal":{"name":"Les Cahiers de prothese","volume":" 66","pages":"18-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Les Cahiers de prothese","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study of the ceramicbutt joint in metal-ceramic prosthesis permits to compare three different laboratory procedures. With the results obtained with two reading processes (numerical measurement and direct measurement of image replicas of S.E.M. to evaluate the marginal gap, it is possible to confirm that: the gold foil method gives the thinnest gap (between 32.7 and 44.7 micrometers) with presence of overcontoured margins. The ceramicbutt joint made by duplicate method, in refractory material, proves to be larger (between 57 and 67.8 micrometers) with overhanging margins, and damaged by sandblasting. The direct elaboration method, on a plaster model, proves to be less precise (gap between 74.6 and 80.4 micrometers) with a round but glossy ceramic margins.

陶瓷假体的陶瓷牙缘。三种制造工艺的比较研究]。
本研究的陶瓷关节在金属-陶瓷假体允许比较三种不同的实验室程序。通过两个读取过程(数值测量和直接测量S.E.M.图像副本以评估边缘间隙)获得的结果,可以确认:金箔方法给出了最薄的间隙(在32.7和44.7微米之间),存在过度轮廓的边缘。用耐火材料制作的陶瓷接头尺寸较大(57 ~ 67.8微米),边缘突出,喷砂损坏。在石膏模型上的直接精加工方法被证明精度较低(缺口在74.6到80.4微米之间),边缘是圆形但有光泽的陶瓷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信