Modelling tree biomass using direct and additive methods with point cloud deep learning in a temperate mixed forest

IF 5.7 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Harry Seely , Nicholas C. Coops , Joanne C. White , David Montwé , Lukas Winiwarter , Ahmed Ragab
{"title":"Modelling tree biomass using direct and additive methods with point cloud deep learning in a temperate mixed forest","authors":"Harry Seely ,&nbsp;Nicholas C. Coops ,&nbsp;Joanne C. White ,&nbsp;David Montwé ,&nbsp;Lukas Winiwarter ,&nbsp;Ahmed Ragab","doi":"10.1016/j.srs.2023.100110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Airborne laser scanning (ALS) data has been widely used for total aboveground tree biomass (AGB) modelling, however, there is less research focusing on estimating specific tree biomass components (wood, branches, bark, and foliage). Knowledge about these biomass components is essential for carbon accounting, understanding forest nutrient cycling, and other applications. In this study, we compare additive AGB estimation (sum of estimated components) with direct AGB estimation using deep neural network (DNN) and random forest (RF) models. We utilise two point cloud DNNs: point-based Dynamic Graph Convolutional Neural Network (DGCNN) and Octree-based Convolutional Neural Network (OCNN). DNN and RF models were trained using a dataset comprised of 2336 sample plots from a mixed temperate forest in New Brunswick, Canada. Results indicate that additive AGB models perform similarly to direct models in terms of coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) and root-mean square error (RMSE), and reduced the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) by 22% on average. Compared to RF, the DNNs provided a small improvement in performance, with OCNN explaining 5% more variation in the data (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.76) and reducing MAPE by 20% on average. Overall, this study showcases the effectiveness of additive tree AGB models and highlights the potential of DNNs for enhanced AGB estimation. To further improve DNN performance, we recommend using larger training datasets, implementing hyperparameter optimization, and incorporating additional data such as multispectral imagery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101147,"journal":{"name":"Science of Remote Sensing","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100110"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017223000354/pdfft?md5=a43818cd94d3610e1df7b41e142ca45c&pid=1-s2.0-S2666017223000354-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666017223000354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Airborne laser scanning (ALS) data has been widely used for total aboveground tree biomass (AGB) modelling, however, there is less research focusing on estimating specific tree biomass components (wood, branches, bark, and foliage). Knowledge about these biomass components is essential for carbon accounting, understanding forest nutrient cycling, and other applications. In this study, we compare additive AGB estimation (sum of estimated components) with direct AGB estimation using deep neural network (DNN) and random forest (RF) models. We utilise two point cloud DNNs: point-based Dynamic Graph Convolutional Neural Network (DGCNN) and Octree-based Convolutional Neural Network (OCNN). DNN and RF models were trained using a dataset comprised of 2336 sample plots from a mixed temperate forest in New Brunswick, Canada. Results indicate that additive AGB models perform similarly to direct models in terms of coefficient of determination (R2) and root-mean square error (RMSE), and reduced the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) by 22% on average. Compared to RF, the DNNs provided a small improvement in performance, with OCNN explaining 5% more variation in the data (R2 = 0.76) and reducing MAPE by 20% on average. Overall, this study showcases the effectiveness of additive tree AGB models and highlights the potential of DNNs for enhanced AGB estimation. To further improve DNN performance, we recommend using larger training datasets, implementing hyperparameter optimization, and incorporating additional data such as multispectral imagery.

基于点云深度学习的直接和加性方法在温带混交林中模拟树木生物量
机载激光扫描(ALS)数据已被广泛用于地面树木总生物量(AGB)建模,然而,对估算特定树木生物量成分(木材、树枝、树皮和树叶)的研究较少。了解这些生物量成分对于碳核算、了解森林养分循环和其他应用至关重要。在这项研究中,我们比较了使用深度神经网络(DNN)和随机森林(RF)模型的加性AGB估计(估计成分的总和)和直接AGB估计。我们使用两个点云深度神经网络:基于点的动态图卷积神经网络(DGCNN)和基于八叉树的卷积神经网络(OCNN)。DNN和RF模型使用加拿大新不伦瑞克省混合温带森林的2336个样地组成的数据集进行训练。结果表明,加性AGB模型在决定系数(R2)和均方根误差(RMSE)方面与直接模型相似,平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)平均降低22%。与RF相比,dnn在性能上有小幅改善,OCNN在数据中解释了5%的变化(R2 = 0.76),平均减少了20%的MAPE。总的来说,本研究展示了加性树AGB模型的有效性,并强调了dnn在增强AGB估计方面的潜力。为了进一步提高深度神经网络的性能,我们建议使用更大的训练数据集,实现超参数优化,并纳入额外的数据,如多光谱图像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信