How does evidence-based medicine training affect medical students' views on traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine and the conspiracy theories about COVID-19: a nationwide study.

Özlem Coşkun, Yavuz Selim Kıyak, Işıl İrem Budakoğlu
{"title":"How does evidence-based medicine training affect medical students' views on traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine and the conspiracy theories about COVID-19: a nationwide study.","authors":"Özlem Coşkun, Yavuz Selim Kıyak, Işıl İrem Budakoğlu","doi":"10.1017/S1463423623000464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>It was aimed to explore the relationship between evidence-based medicine (EBM) training and medical students' views on traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine (TCAM) and their views on conspiracies about COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical students constitute the future workforce of primary health care services. The relationship between EBM training and their views on conspiracies about COVID-19 is critical to explore for providing a better primary health care. The relationship EBM training and medical students' views on TCAM is also important in this regard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a cross-sectional study. Turkish medical students were surveyed about EBM training, TCAM, and COVID-19 conspiracies. The electronic survey form consisted of five parts: Demographic characteristics, views and self-perceived knowledge about TCAM and the methods, views on the origin of SARS-COV-2, participation in EBM training, and views on TCAM training. A total of 49 medical schools provided response. Along with descriptive statistics, Chi-square test was utilized.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among 2577 participants, 24.0% of them believed SARS-COV-2 was artificially designed. The students who have participated in EBM training via both lecture and small group discussions have a less positive view on TCAM than both the students who have not participated in any EBM training (<i>p</i> < 0.05) and the students who participated in only-lectures (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There was a significant association between EBM training and whether believing COVID-19 (SARS-COV-2) has been designed purposefully by some people or it has emerged naturally <i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> (1) = 17.21 <i>p</i> < 0.001. The odds of thinking COVID-19 emerged naturally was 1.85 times higher (95% CI: 1.38-2.47) if the students have participated in EBM training via both lectures and small group discussions than if they have not participated in any EBM training. EBM training affects medical students in terms of beliefs on COVID-19 conspiracies.</p>","PeriodicalId":74493,"journal":{"name":"Primary health care research & development","volume":"24 ","pages":"e65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10689091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary health care research & development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423623000464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: It was aimed to explore the relationship between evidence-based medicine (EBM) training and medical students' views on traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine (TCAM) and their views on conspiracies about COVID-19.

Background: Medical students constitute the future workforce of primary health care services. The relationship between EBM training and their views on conspiracies about COVID-19 is critical to explore for providing a better primary health care. The relationship EBM training and medical students' views on TCAM is also important in this regard.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. Turkish medical students were surveyed about EBM training, TCAM, and COVID-19 conspiracies. The electronic survey form consisted of five parts: Demographic characteristics, views and self-perceived knowledge about TCAM and the methods, views on the origin of SARS-COV-2, participation in EBM training, and views on TCAM training. A total of 49 medical schools provided response. Along with descriptive statistics, Chi-square test was utilized.

Findings: Among 2577 participants, 24.0% of them believed SARS-COV-2 was artificially designed. The students who have participated in EBM training via both lecture and small group discussions have a less positive view on TCAM than both the students who have not participated in any EBM training (p < 0.05) and the students who participated in only-lectures (p < 0.05). There was a significant association between EBM training and whether believing COVID-19 (SARS-COV-2) has been designed purposefully by some people or it has emerged naturally χ2 (1) = 17.21 p < 0.001. The odds of thinking COVID-19 emerged naturally was 1.85 times higher (95% CI: 1.38-2.47) if the students have participated in EBM training via both lectures and small group discussions than if they have not participated in any EBM training. EBM training affects medical students in terms of beliefs on COVID-19 conspiracies.

循证医学培训如何影响医学生对传统、补充和替代医学的看法以及关于COVID-19的阴谋论:一项全国性研究
目的:探讨循证医学(EBM)培训与医学生对传统、补充和替代医学(TCAM)的看法以及对COVID-19阴谋论的看法之间的关系。背景:医学生构成了初级卫生保健服务的未来劳动力。EBM培训与他们对COVID-19阴谋论的看法之间的关系对于探索提供更好的初级卫生保健至关重要。在这方面,EBM培训与医学生对TCAM的看法之间的关系也很重要。方法:这是一个横断面研究。对土耳其医学生进行了关于EBM培训、TCAM和COVID-19阴谋的调查。电子调查表包括人口学特征、对TCAM和方法的看法和自我认知知识、对SARS-COV-2起源的看法、参加EBM培训的情况、对TCAM培训的看法五个部分。共有49所医学院做出了回应。采用描述性统计,卡方检验。结果:在2577名参与者中,24.0%的人认为SARS-COV-2是人为设计的。与没有参加任何EBM培训的学生(p < 0.05)和只参加讲座的学生(p < 0.05)相比,同时参加过讲座和小组讨论的EBM培训的学生对TCAM的积极看法更低。EBM培训与相信COVID-19 (SARS-COV-2)是某些人有意设计的还是自然出现的之间存在显著关联,χ2 (1) = 17.21 p < 0.001。如果学生通过讲座和小组讨论参加了循证医学培训,那么认为COVID-19自然出现的几率比没有参加任何循证医学培训的学生高1.85倍(95% CI: 1.38-2.47)。循证医学培训影响医学生对COVID-19阴谋论的信念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信