Cost-Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab in Patients with High-Risk, Early-Stage, Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Switzerland.

IF 2 Q2 ECONOMICS
PharmacoEconomics Open Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-24 DOI:10.1007/s41669-023-00445-8
Andrea Favre-Bulle, Min Huang, Amin Haiderali, Arjun Bhadhuri
{"title":"Cost-Effectiveness of Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab in Patients with High-Risk, Early-Stage, Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Switzerland.","authors":"Andrea Favre-Bulle, Min Huang, Amin Haiderali, Arjun Bhadhuri","doi":"10.1007/s41669-023-00445-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus placebo followed by adjuvant placebo for patients with high-risk, early-stage, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) from a Swiss third-party payer perspective over a lifetime horizon (51 years).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A transition model with four health states (event-free, locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, and death) was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for the treatment of high-risk, early-stage TNBC. Data were utilized from the KEYNOTE-522 randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03036488). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated, which was reported as cost per life year or quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. A one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis, a probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) and scenario analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the model results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Base-case results estimated an ICER of 14,114 Swiss francs (CHF)/QALY for pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. Results were most sensitive to changes in the extrapolation of event-free survival (EFS). All sensitivity and scenario analyses generated ICERs below the willingness-to-pay threshold of CHF100,000/QALY, and the PSA showed a 98.8% probability that the ICER would be below this threshold.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Due to the limited follow-up period in the KEYNOTE-522 trial, EFS data were extrapolated over the lifetime horizon to inform transition probabilities. Extensive validation and scenario analyses ensured the results were robust.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The model demonstrated that neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab was cost-effective versus chemotherapy alone in patients with high-risk, early-stage TNBC in Switzerland.</p>","PeriodicalId":19770,"journal":{"name":"PharmacoEconomics Open","volume":" ","pages":"91-101"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10781656/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmacoEconomics Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-023-00445-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus placebo followed by adjuvant placebo for patients with high-risk, early-stage, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) from a Swiss third-party payer perspective over a lifetime horizon (51 years).

Materials and methods: A transition model with four health states (event-free, locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, and death) was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for the treatment of high-risk, early-stage TNBC. Data were utilized from the KEYNOTE-522 randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03036488). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated, which was reported as cost per life year or quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. A one-way deterministic sensitivity analysis, a probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) and scenario analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the model results.

Results: Base-case results estimated an ICER of 14,114 Swiss francs (CHF)/QALY for pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. Results were most sensitive to changes in the extrapolation of event-free survival (EFS). All sensitivity and scenario analyses generated ICERs below the willingness-to-pay threshold of CHF100,000/QALY, and the PSA showed a 98.8% probability that the ICER would be below this threshold.

Limitations: Due to the limited follow-up period in the KEYNOTE-522 trial, EFS data were extrapolated over the lifetime horizon to inform transition probabilities. Extensive validation and scenario analyses ensured the results were robust.

Conclusion: The model demonstrated that neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab was cost-effective versus chemotherapy alone in patients with high-risk, early-stage TNBC in Switzerland.

瑞士高风险、早期三阴性乳腺癌患者新辅助派姆单抗加化疗后再辅助派姆单抗的成本效益
目的:本研究从瑞士第三方付款人的角度评估了高风险、早期三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者新辅助派姆单抗加化疗后再辅助派姆单抗与新辅助化疗加安慰剂后再辅助安慰剂的成本效益。材料和方法:建立了一个包含四种健康状态(无事件、局部复发、远处转移和死亡)的过渡模型,以评估派姆单抗加化疗与单独化疗治疗高危早期TNBC的成本-效果。数据来自KEYNOTE-522随机对照试验(ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03036488)。计算增量成本-效果比(ICER),报告为每生命年的成本或获得的质量调整生命年(QALY)。通过单向确定性敏感性分析、概率敏感性分析(PSA)和情景分析来评估模型结果的稳健性。结果:基础病例结果估计派姆单抗联合化疗与单独化疗的ICER为14,114瑞士法郎/QALY。结果对无事件生存期(EFS)外推的变化最为敏感。所有敏感性和情景分析均得出ICERs低于10万瑞士法郎/QALY的支付意愿阈值,PSA显示ICERs低于该阈值的概率为98.8%。局限性:由于KEYNOTE-522试验的随访时间有限,EFS数据是在生命周期内外推的,以告知转移概率。广泛的验证和情景分析确保了结果的可靠性。结论:该模型表明,在瑞士的高风险早期TNBC患者中,新辅助派姆单抗加化疗后再辅助派姆单抗比单独化疗更具成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: PharmacoEconomics - Open focuses on applied research on the economic implications and health outcomes associated with drugs, devices and other healthcare interventions. The journal includes, but is not limited to, the following research areas:Economic analysis of healthcare interventionsHealth outcomes researchCost-of-illness studiesQuality-of-life studiesAdditional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in PharmacoEconomics -Open may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts. Letters to the Editor are welcomed and will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信