Discharges against medical advice: time to take another look. A retrospective review of discharges against medical advice focused on prevention.

Q2 Medicine
Hospital practice (1995) Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-10 DOI:10.1080/21548331.2023.2287431
Fnu Jaydev, Warren Gavin, Jason Russ, Emily Holmes, Vinod Kumar, Joshua Sadowski, Areeba Kara
{"title":"Discharges against medical advice: time to take another look. A retrospective review of discharges against medical advice focused on prevention.","authors":"Fnu Jaydev, Warren Gavin, Jason Russ, Emily Holmes, Vinod Kumar, Joshua Sadowski, Areeba Kara","doi":"10.1080/21548331.2023.2287431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Discharges against medical advice (DAMA) increase the risk of death.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrieved DAMA from five hospitals within a large health system and reviewed 10% of DAMA from the academic site between 2016 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DAMA increased at the onset of the pandemic. Patients who discharged AMA multiple times accounted for a third of all DAMA. Detailed review was completed for 278 patients who discharged AMA from the academic site. In this sample, women comprised 52% of those who discharged AMA multiple times. Relative to the proportion of all discharges from the academic site during the study period, Black patients were overrepresented among DAMA (21% vs. 34%, <i>p</i> < .05). Patients with multiple AMA discharges were younger, more likely to be unmarried, or have substance use disorders (SUD) than those who discharged AMA once. The most common reason for requesting premature discharge noted in <i>n</i> = 77, 28% of instances was related to patient obligations outside the hospital. Hospital policies and procedures contributed in <i>n</i> = 29, 10% of instances. Reasons for requesting premature discharge and documentation of key safety processes were similar by gender and race however the sample may be underpowered to detect differences. Capacity was evaluated in 109 (39%). Among those who consumed alcohol (<i>n</i> = 81 (29%)) or had SUDs (<i>n</i> = 112 (40%)), information on the amount or timing of last use was missing in <i>n</i> = 39 (48%) and <i>n</i> = 74 (66%), respectively. Critical tools to manage illness were provided in 45 (16%) of DAMA reviewed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Drivers of AMA discharge may differ by AMA discharge frequency. Recognition of the common reasons for requesting premature discharge may help destigmatize AMA discharges and also identifies early assessments by social work colleagues as an important prevention strategy. Opportunities also exist in anticipating and preventing withdrawal symptoms and in revising hospital practices that contribute to DAMA.</p>","PeriodicalId":35045,"journal":{"name":"Hospital practice (1995)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital practice (1995)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2023.2287431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Discharges against medical advice (DAMA) increase the risk of death.

Methods: We retrieved DAMA from five hospitals within a large health system and reviewed 10% of DAMA from the academic site between 2016 and 2021.

Results: DAMA increased at the onset of the pandemic. Patients who discharged AMA multiple times accounted for a third of all DAMA. Detailed review was completed for 278 patients who discharged AMA from the academic site. In this sample, women comprised 52% of those who discharged AMA multiple times. Relative to the proportion of all discharges from the academic site during the study period, Black patients were overrepresented among DAMA (21% vs. 34%, p < .05). Patients with multiple AMA discharges were younger, more likely to be unmarried, or have substance use disorders (SUD) than those who discharged AMA once. The most common reason for requesting premature discharge noted in n = 77, 28% of instances was related to patient obligations outside the hospital. Hospital policies and procedures contributed in n = 29, 10% of instances. Reasons for requesting premature discharge and documentation of key safety processes were similar by gender and race however the sample may be underpowered to detect differences. Capacity was evaluated in 109 (39%). Among those who consumed alcohol (n = 81 (29%)) or had SUDs (n = 112 (40%)), information on the amount or timing of last use was missing in n = 39 (48%) and n = 74 (66%), respectively. Critical tools to manage illness were provided in 45 (16%) of DAMA reviewed.

Conclusions: Drivers of AMA discharge may differ by AMA discharge frequency. Recognition of the common reasons for requesting premature discharge may help destigmatize AMA discharges and also identifies early assessments by social work colleagues as an important prevention strategy. Opportunities also exist in anticipating and preventing withdrawal symptoms and in revising hospital practices that contribute to DAMA.

不遵医嘱出院:是时候重新审视了。对不遵医嘱出院的回顾性审查,重点是预防。
背景:不遵医嘱出院(DAMA)增加死亡风险。方法:我们从一个大型卫生系统内的五家医院检索了DAMA,并回顾了2016-2021年间学术网站中10%的DAMA。结果:DAMA在大流行开始时增加。多次出院的患者占所有DAMA的三分之一。我们完成了278名从学术中心出院的AMA患者的详细回顾。在这个样本中,女性占多次服用AMA的患者的52%。相对于研究期间所有学术场所的出院比例,黑人患者在DAMA中的比例过高(21% vs.34%, p n = 77), 28%的病例与患者在医院外的义务有关。医院政策和程序占29.10%。要求提前出院和记录关键安全流程的原因在性别和种族上是相似的,但样本可能不足以发现差异。109家(39%)进行了容量评估。在饮酒者(n = 81(29%))或sud患者(n = 112(40%))中,分别有n = 39(48%)和n = 74(66%)缺少关于最后一次使用的数量或时间的信息。在审查的45个(16%)DAMA中提供了管理疾病的关键工具。结论:AMA放电的驱动因素可能因AMA放电频率而异。认识到要求提前出院的常见原因可能有助于消除AMA出院的污名,并确定社会工作同事的早期评估是一项重要的预防策略。在预测和预防戒断症状以及修订有助于DAMA的医院做法方面也存在机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hospital practice (1995)
Hospital practice (1995) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信