Mohammed Abou Kaoud, Ran Nissan, Amitai Segev, Avi Sabbag, David Orion, Elad Maor
{"title":"Levetiracetam Interaction with Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Pharmacovigilance Study.","authors":"Mohammed Abou Kaoud, Ran Nissan, Amitai Segev, Avi Sabbag, David Orion, Elad Maor","doi":"10.1007/s40263-023-01052-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Levetiracetam is widely used in post-stroke epilepsy. However, it is suspected to possess P-glycoprotein (P-gp) induction properties, and therefore, a potentially significant interaction with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). We aimed to search for ischemic stroke signals with levetiracetam and the DOACs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective pharmacovigilance study, we used the FAERS database to identify ischemic stroke events associated with DOACs and concomitant use of levetiracetam. We evaluated disproportionate reporting by the adjusted reporting odds ratio (adjROR) and the lower bound of the shrinkage 95% confidence interval. When shrinkage is positive, an increased risk of a specific adverse event occurrence is emphasized over the sum of the individual risks when these same drugs are used separately.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 1841 (1.5%), 3731 (5.3%), 338 (4.9%), and 1723 (1.3%) ischemic stroke reports with apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban, respectively. The adjROR of the interaction effect was 3.57 (95% CI 2.81-4.58) between DOACs and levetiracetam. The shrinkage analysis detected an interaction between each of the DOACs and levetiracetam. The logistic model and shrinkage analysis failed to detect an interaction when queried for hemorrhagic stroke. A significant signal in the classical enzyme inducer, carbamazepine, strengthened our results (adjROR; 8.47, 95% CI 5.37-13.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study shows a strong signal for the levetiracetam interaction with the DOACs. Our findings suggest implementation of a drug monitoring strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10508,"journal":{"name":"CNS drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1111-1121"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CNS drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-023-01052-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Levetiracetam is widely used in post-stroke epilepsy. However, it is suspected to possess P-glycoprotein (P-gp) induction properties, and therefore, a potentially significant interaction with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). We aimed to search for ischemic stroke signals with levetiracetam and the DOACs.
Methods: In this retrospective pharmacovigilance study, we used the FAERS database to identify ischemic stroke events associated with DOACs and concomitant use of levetiracetam. We evaluated disproportionate reporting by the adjusted reporting odds ratio (adjROR) and the lower bound of the shrinkage 95% confidence interval. When shrinkage is positive, an increased risk of a specific adverse event occurrence is emphasized over the sum of the individual risks when these same drugs are used separately.
Results: We identified 1841 (1.5%), 3731 (5.3%), 338 (4.9%), and 1723 (1.3%) ischemic stroke reports with apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban, respectively. The adjROR of the interaction effect was 3.57 (95% CI 2.81-4.58) between DOACs and levetiracetam. The shrinkage analysis detected an interaction between each of the DOACs and levetiracetam. The logistic model and shrinkage analysis failed to detect an interaction when queried for hemorrhagic stroke. A significant signal in the classical enzyme inducer, carbamazepine, strengthened our results (adjROR; 8.47, 95% CI 5.37-13.36).
Conclusions: Our study shows a strong signal for the levetiracetam interaction with the DOACs. Our findings suggest implementation of a drug monitoring strategy.
背景:左乙拉西坦被广泛应用于脑卒中后癫痫。然而,它被怀疑具有p -糖蛋白(P-gp)诱导特性,因此,与直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)有潜在的显著相互作用。我们的目的是寻找缺血性脑卒中信号与左乙拉西坦和DOACs。方法:在这项回顾性药物警戒研究中,我们使用FAERS数据库来识别与DOACs和左乙拉西坦联合使用相关的缺血性脑卒中事件。我们通过调整报告优势比(adjROR)和收缩95%置信区间的下界来评估不成比例的报告。当收缩为正时,当这些相同的药物单独使用时,特定不良事件发生的风险增加比个体风险的总和更重要。结果:我们分别确定了1841例(1.5%)、3731例(5.3%)、338例(4.9%)和1723例(1.3%)使用阿哌沙班、达比加群、依多沙班和利伐沙班的缺血性卒中报告。DOACs与左乙乙胺相互作用效应的修正ror为3.57 (95% CI 2.81 ~ 4.58)。收缩分析检测到每个doac和左乙拉西坦之间的相互作用。当查询出血性中风时,逻辑模型和收缩分析未能检测到相互作用。经典酶诱导剂卡马西平的显著信号强化了我们的结果(adjROR;8.47, 95% ci 5.37-13.36)。结论:我们的研究显示了左乙拉西坦与doac相互作用的强烈信号。我们的发现建议实施药物监测策略。
期刊介绍:
CNS Drugs promotes rational pharmacotherapy within the disciplines of clinical psychiatry and neurology. The Journal includes:
- Overviews of contentious or emerging issues.
- Comprehensive narrative reviews that provide an authoritative source of information on pharmacological approaches to managing neurological and psychiatric illnesses.
- Systematic reviews that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement.
- Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established drugs in neurology and psychiatry.
- Original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies with a strong link to clinical practice, such as clinical pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies, clinical trials, meta-analyses, outcomes research, and pharmacoeconomic and pharmacoepidemiological studies.
Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in CNS Drugs may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.