Perceptions of effective advice in pregnancy – The case of activity

Harriet Gross , Penny E. Bee
{"title":"Perceptions of effective advice in pregnancy – The case of activity","authors":"Harriet Gross ,&nbsp;Penny E. Bee","doi":"10.1016/j.cein.2005.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The paper uses qualitative and quantitative data arising from a longitudinal study of pregnant women to examine women’s responses to advice provided about changing their behaviour during pregnancy.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A longitudinal study over nine months involving a semi-structured questionnaire and interview schedule together with a range of psychological measures and activity measurement using actimetry. The purpose of the main study was to explore maternal daily activity in low-risk pregnancy.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>57 women volunteers aged (mean age 26.3 years) with low-risk pregnancy, recruited via an East Midlands City Centre teaching hospital antenatal clinic.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Data on advice suggest that 1) response to advice is extremely varied and that reduction in activity is not always welcome; 2) factors affecting women’s responses to advice include the importance they attach to an active lifestyle in pregnancy.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The paper highlights the inherent difficulties of providing effective advice during the short period of pregnancy; the need for clear and consistent messages to be provided by all health professionals involved in antenatal care as well as the difficulty of changing cultural expectations of pregnancy-appropriate behaviours.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87580,"journal":{"name":"Clinical effectiveness in nursing","volume":"8 3","pages":"Pages 161-169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cein.2005.03.002","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical effectiveness in nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136190040500021X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Objectives

The paper uses qualitative and quantitative data arising from a longitudinal study of pregnant women to examine women’s responses to advice provided about changing their behaviour during pregnancy.

Design

A longitudinal study over nine months involving a semi-structured questionnaire and interview schedule together with a range of psychological measures and activity measurement using actimetry. The purpose of the main study was to explore maternal daily activity in low-risk pregnancy.

Participants

57 women volunteers aged (mean age 26.3 years) with low-risk pregnancy, recruited via an East Midlands City Centre teaching hospital antenatal clinic.

Results

Data on advice suggest that 1) response to advice is extremely varied and that reduction in activity is not always welcome; 2) factors affecting women’s responses to advice include the importance they attach to an active lifestyle in pregnancy.

Conclusions

The paper highlights the inherent difficulties of providing effective advice during the short period of pregnancy; the need for clear and consistent messages to be provided by all health professionals involved in antenatal care as well as the difficulty of changing cultural expectations of pregnancy-appropriate behaviours.

对孕期有效建议的认识-以活动为例
目的:本文利用对孕妇进行的一项纵向研究得出的定性和定量数据,调查妇女对有关在怀孕期间改变行为的建议的反应。设计一项为期9个月的纵向研究,包括半结构化问卷调查和访谈计划,以及一系列心理测量和使用活动测量法的活动测量。主要研究的目的是探讨低风险妊娠期间产妇的日常活动情况。参与者:57名年龄(平均26.3岁)低风险怀孕的女性志愿者,通过东米德兰兹市中心教学医院产前诊所招募。结果:关于建议的数据表明:1)对建议的反应千差万别,减少活动并不总是受欢迎的;影响妇女对建议的反应的因素包括她们对怀孕期间积极生活方式的重视。结论本文强调了在短期妊娠期提供有效建议的内在困难;参与产前保健的所有保健专业人员需要提供明确和一致的信息,以及改变对适当怀孕行为的文化期望的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信