Choices for maternity care are they still ‘an illusion’? : A qualitative exploration of women’s experiences in early pregnancy

Julie Jomeen RN: RM: MA (Lecturer in Midwifery)
{"title":"Choices for maternity care are they still ‘an illusion’? : A qualitative exploration of women’s experiences in early pregnancy","authors":"Julie Jomeen RN: RM: MA (Lecturer in Midwifery)","doi":"10.1016/j.cein.2006.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>This paper presents a study exploring women’s experiences of making choices for maternity care in early pregnancy. The content will provide clinically useful information to </span>midwives and health care professionals involved in caring for pregnant women.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Choice has been high on the maternity care agenda since 1993. Policies promoting choice were in part a response to critiques of the biomedical model, but also in recognition that an increased sense of control and quality of experience can have both physical and psychological benefits. Choice however may not be as straightforward as policy makers suggest and to date women’s own experiences of choice remain relatively silent in the debate.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>10 women took part in in-depth narrative interviews in early pregnancy, between 12 and 16 weeks gestation, in order to explore their choices for care, the rationale for those choices and their experiences and feelings at that point in their pregnancies.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Three key themes emerged with regard to choice and revealed how women following a positive pregnancy test adopt a pregnant woman identity. This new identity invests them with both ownership of the pregnancy and a responsibility to the fetus to make the right decisions with regard to choices for care. Responsible choices are defined by both explicit and implicit influences and discourses, which fundamentally facilitate or inhibit choice.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Over a decade after choice was hailed as essential to ensuring a positive maternity experience for women, there remains a lack of evidence to suggest that choice is a reality for many women accessing maternity care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":87580,"journal":{"name":"Clinical effectiveness in nursing","volume":"9 ","pages":"Pages e191-e200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cein.2006.10.002","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical effectiveness in nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361900406000574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Objective

This paper presents a study exploring women’s experiences of making choices for maternity care in early pregnancy. The content will provide clinically useful information to midwives and health care professionals involved in caring for pregnant women.

Background

Choice has been high on the maternity care agenda since 1993. Policies promoting choice were in part a response to critiques of the biomedical model, but also in recognition that an increased sense of control and quality of experience can have both physical and psychological benefits. Choice however may not be as straightforward as policy makers suggest and to date women’s own experiences of choice remain relatively silent in the debate.

Methodology

10 women took part in in-depth narrative interviews in early pregnancy, between 12 and 16 weeks gestation, in order to explore their choices for care, the rationale for those choices and their experiences and feelings at that point in their pregnancies.

Findings

Three key themes emerged with regard to choice and revealed how women following a positive pregnancy test adopt a pregnant woman identity. This new identity invests them with both ownership of the pregnancy and a responsibility to the fetus to make the right decisions with regard to choices for care. Responsible choices are defined by both explicit and implicit influences and discourses, which fundamentally facilitate or inhibit choice.

Conclusion

Over a decade after choice was hailed as essential to ensuring a positive maternity experience for women, there remains a lack of evidence to suggest that choice is a reality for many women accessing maternity care.

产科护理的选择仍然是“一种幻觉”吗?:对妇女妊娠早期经历的定性探讨
目的探讨妇女在妊娠早期选择产科护理的经验。该内容将为参与照顾孕妇的助产士和保健专业人员提供临床有用的信息。自1993年以来,选择一直是产妇保健议程上的重要议题。促进选择的政策在一定程度上是对对生物医学模式的批评的回应,但也承认增加的控制感和体验质量可以对身体和心理都有好处。然而,选择可能并不像政策制定者所暗示的那样直截了当,迄今为止,女性自己的选择经历在辩论中相对保持沉默。研究方法:女性在怀孕早期(怀孕12至16周)接受了深度叙述性访谈,以探讨她们对护理的选择、这些选择的理由以及她们在怀孕期间的经历和感受。研究发现,在选择方面出现了三个关键主题,揭示了怀孕测试呈阳性的女性是如何接受孕妇身份的。这种新的身份赋予她们对怀孕的所有权和对胎儿做出正确决定的责任。负责任的选择是由显性和隐性影响和话语定义的,它们从根本上促进或抑制选择。十多年来,选择被誉为确保女性积极孕产体验的关键,但仍然缺乏证据表明,许多女性获得孕产护理的选择是一个现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信